Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 26, Issue 10, pp 6317–6331 | Cite as

Sericin assisted eco-friendly reactive dyeing for cotton fabric

  • Pervin AnisEmail author
  • Tuba Toprak
  • Egemen Kutlu
Original Research
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

A large amount of salt has been used in reactive dyeing of cotton. In this study, the reduction in the amount of salt used in reactive dyeing of cotton fabric after the sericin application by different methods was investigated in detailed. The effects of different cross-links (citric acid and butane tetracarboxylic acid) for the bonding of the sericin to the cotton fabric were also investigated. The results were evaluated in terms of color coordinates and color strength, washing and rubbing fastness, and crease recovery angle. Presence of the sericin onto cotton fabric after the application was evidenced with FT-IR spectra. The application of sericin and subsequent dyeing resulted in similar color depths to the conventional dyeing even with half the salt used in conventional reactive dyeing. The presence of cross-links in the pre-treatment baths did not reveal significant differences in color strengths compared to used only sericin. The fastness values of reactive dyed fabrics after sericin application had similar fastness values with traditional dyed ones. Crease recovery angles showed an increase after sericin pre-treatment. Sericin application before reactive dyeing could be one of the best alternative ways to reduce salt usage in reactive dyeing.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Eco-friendly Cotton Modification Sericin Reactive dyeing Salt-free 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors express their sincere thanks for funding this study with the project “OUAP (MH)-2019/5 Pamuklu Materyallerin Reaktif ve Direkt Boyar Maddeler ile Boyanmasında Atık Yükünü Düşürecek Alternatif Yöntemlerin İncelenmesi” by the Scientific Research Projects Department of Bursa Uludağ University.

References

  1. Abidi N, Cabrales L, Hequet E (2010) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic approach to the study of the secondary cell wall development in cotton fiber. Cellulose 17:309–320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9366-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abidi N, Cabrales L, Haigler CH (2014) Changes in the cell wall and cellulose content of developing cotton fibers investigated by FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Polym 100:9–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahn J-S, Choi H-K, Lee K-H et al (2001) Novel mucoadhesive polymer prepared by template polymerization of acrylic acid in the presence of silk sericin. J Appl Polym Sci 80:274–280.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allègre C, Moulin P, Maisseu M, Charbit F (2006) Treatment and reuse of reactive dyeing effluents. J Memb Sci 269:15–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Altman GH, Diaz F, Jakuba C et al (2003) Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials 24:401–416.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00353-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arivithamani N, Giri Dev VR (2016) Salt-free reactive dyeing of cotton hosiery fabrics by exhaust application of cationic agent. Carbohydr Polym 152:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bairagi N, Gulrajani ML, Deopura BL, Shrivastava A (2005) Dyeing of N-modified viscose rayon fibres with reactive dyes. Coloration Technol 121:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhandari B, Singh SSJ, Rose NM (2018) Effect of sericin treatment conditions on dye ability of cotton fabric. J Appl Nat Sci 10:102–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhuiyan MAR, Islam A, Islam S et al (2017) Improving dyeability and antibacterial activity of Lawsonia inermis L on jute fabrics by Chitosan Pretreatment. Text Cloth Sustain 3:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40689-016-0023-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burkinshaw SM (2016) Cellulosic fibres. In: Filarowski A (ed) Physico-chemical aspects of textile coloration. Wiley, West Yorkshire, pp 249–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cao T-T, Zhang Y-Q (2016) Processing and characterization of silk sericin from Bombyx mori and its application in biomaterials and biomedicines. Mater Sci Eng C 61:940–952.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2015.12.082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chakraborty JN (ed) (2014) Dyeing with reactive dye. In: Fundamentals and practices in colouration of textiles, vol 2. Woodhead Publishing, New Delhi, pp 61–77Google Scholar
  13. Chang YB, Tu PC, Wu MW et al (2008) A study on chitosan modification of polyester fabrics by atmospheric pressure plasma and its antibacterial effects. Fibers Polym 9:307–311.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-008-0049-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chaudhary H, Gupta D, Gupta C (2017) Multifunctional dyeing and finishing of polyester with sericin and basic dyes. J Text Inst 108:314–324.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2016.1165401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen L, Wang B, Ruan X et al (2015) Hydrolysis-free and fully recyclable reactive dyeing of cotton in green, non-nucleophilic solvents for a sustainable textile industry. J Clean Prod 107:550–556.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Choi H-M, Srinivasan M, Morris NM (1994) Single-step dyeing and finishing treatment of cotton with 1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylic acid. J Appl Polym Sci 54:2107–2118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. CIRFS European Man-Made Fibres Association (2015) https://www.cirfs.org/statistics/key-statistics/world-production-fibre
  18. Daithankar AV, Padamwar MN, Pisal SS et al (2005) Moisturizing efficiency of silk protein hydrolysate: silk fibroin. Indian J Biotechnol 4:115–121Google Scholar
  19. Das D, Bakshi S, Bhattacharya P (2014) Dyeing of sericin-modified cotton with reactive dyes. J Text Inst 105:314–320.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X16652998 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dewair M, Baur X, Ziegler K (1985) Use of immunoblot technique for detection of human IgE and IgG antibodies to individual silk proteins. J Allergy Clin Immunol 76:537–542.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(85)90772-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doakhan S, Montazer M, Rashidi A et al (2013) Influence of sericin/TiO2 nanocomposite on cotton fabric: part 1. Enhanced antibacterial effect. Carbohydr Polym 94:737–748.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. El-Tahlawy KF, El-Bendary MA, Elhendawy AG, Hudson SM (2005) The antimicrobial activity of cotton fabrics treated with different crosslinking Agents and Chitosan. Carbohydr Polym 60:421–430.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gulrajani ML, Brahma KP, Senthil Kumar P, Purwar R (2008) Application of silk sericin to polyester fabric. J Appl Polym Sci 109:314–321.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gupta D, Chaudhary H, Gupta C (2015a) Sericin-based polyester textile for medical applications. J Text Inst 106:366–376.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2014.922244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gupta D, Chaudhary H, Gupta C (2015b) Sericin-based polyester textile for medical applications. J Text Inst 106:366–376.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2014.922244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jocic D, Vílchez S, Topalovic T et al (2005) Chitosan/acid dye interactions in wool dyeing system. Carbohydr Polym 60:51–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.11.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Joseph B, Raj SJ (2012) Therapeutic applications and properties of silk proteins from bombyx mori. Front Life Sci 6:55–60.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2012.760491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khatri A, Peerzada MH, Mohsin M, White M (2015) A review on developments in dyeing cotton fabrics with reactive dyes for reducing effluent pollution. J Clean Prod 87:50–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kongdee A, Chinthawan N (2007) Modification of cotton fibers with sericin using non-formaldehyde released crosslinking agents. Res J Text Appar 11:18–26Google Scholar
  30. Kongdee A, Bechtold T, Teufel L (2005) Modification of cellulose fiber with silk sericin. J Appl Polym Sci 96:1421–1428.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.21576 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kundu SC, Dash BC, Dash R, Kaplan DL (2008) Natural protective glue protein, sericin bioengineered by silkworms: potential for biomedical and biotechnological applications. Prog Polym Sci 33:998–1012.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee YH, Pavlostathis SG (2004) Decolorization and toxicity of reactive anthraquinone textile dyes under methanogenic conditions. Water Res 38:1838–1852.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee S-R, Miyazaki K, Hisada K, Hori T (2004) Application of silk sericin to finishing of synthetic fabrics. Sen’ı Gakkaıshı 60:9–15.  https://doi.org/10.2115/fiber.60.9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mathur N, Bhatnagar P, Sharma P (2012) Review of the mutagenicity of textile dye products. Univ J Environ Res Technol 2:1–18Google Scholar
  35. Minoura N, Aiba S, Yohko G et al (1995) Attachment and growth of cultured fibroblast cells on silk protein matrices. J Biomed Mater Res 29:1215–1221.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980305)39:3%3c486:AID-JBM20%3e3.0.CO;2-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Najafi H, Assefipour R, Hajilari M, Movahed HR (2009) One bath method dyeing of polyester/cotton blend fabric with sulphatoethylsulphonyl disperse/reactive dyes treatment by chitin B iopolymer. Afr J Biotechnol 8:1127–1135Google Scholar
  37. Nallathambi G, Ramachandran T, Rajendran V, Palanivelu R (2011) Effect of silica nanoparticles and BTCA on physical properties of cotton fabrics. Mater Res 14:552–559.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392011005000086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neale SM, Peters RH (1946) Electrokinetic measurements with textile fibres and aqueous solutions. Trans Faraday Soc 42:478–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ojstršek A, Doliška A, Fakın D (2008) Analysis of reactive dyestuffs and their hydrolysis by capillary electrophoresis. Anal Sci 24:1581–1587.  https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.24.1581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Omeroglu S, Karaca E, Becerir B (2010) Comparison of bending, drapability and crease recovery behaviors of woven fabrics produced from polyester fibers having different cross-sectional shapes. Text Res J 80:1180–1190.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517509355351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Padamwar M, Pawar A (2004) Silk sericin and its applications: a review. J Sci Ind Res 63:323–329.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1980.tb03093.x Google Scholar
  42. Padamwar MN, Pawar AP, Daithankar AV, Mahadik KR (2005) Silk sericin as a moisturizer: an in vivo study. J Cosmet Dermatol 4:250–257.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-2165.2005.00200.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Panilaitis B, Altman GH, Chen J et al (2003) Macrophage responses to silk. Biomaterials 24:3079–3085.  https://doi.org/10.4304/jsw.8.3.746-753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pisuntornsug C, Yanumet N, Rear EAO (2002) Surface modification to improve dyeing of cotton fabric with a cationic dye. Colaration Technol 118:64–68.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.2002.tb00139.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosa JM, Tambourgi EB, Santana JCC et al (2014) Development of colors with sustainability: a comparative study between dyeing of cotton with reactive and vat dyestuffs. Text Res J 84:1009–1017.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517513517962 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sasaki M, Yamada H, Kato N (2000a) A resistant protein, sericin improves atropine-induced constipation in rats. Food Sci Technol Res 6:280–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sasaki M, Yamada H, Kato N (2000b) Consumption of silk protein, sericin elevates intestinal absorption of zinc, iron, magnesium and calcium in rats. Nutr Res 20:1505–1511.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5317(00)80031-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Šauperl O, Stana-Kleinschek K (2010) Differences between cotton and viscose fibers crosslinked with BTCA. Text Res J 80:383–392.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517509343818 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schramm C, Vukušic SB, Katovic D (2002) Non-formaldehyde durable press finishing of dyed fabrics: evaluation of cotton-bound polycarboxylic acids. Color Technol 118:244–249.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.2002.tb00107.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shahid I, Shahid M, Mohammad F (2013) Green chemistry approaches to develop antimicrobial textiles based on sustainable biopolymers—a review. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:5245–5260.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie303627x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Soong HK, Kenyon KR (1984) Adverse reactions to virgin silk sutures in cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 91:479–483.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(84)34273-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sophonvachiraporn P, Rujiravanit R, Sreethawong T et al (2011) Surface characterization and antimicrobial activity of Chitosan-deposited DBD plasma-modified woven PET surface. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 31:233–249.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-010-9276-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Takahashi M, Tsujimoto K, Yamada H et al (2003) The silk protein, sericin, protects against cell death caused by acute serum deprivation in insect cell culture. Biotechnol Lett 25:1805–1809.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026284620236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tamada Y, Sano M, Niwa K et al (2004) Sulfation of silk sericin and anticoagulant activity of sulfated sericin. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 15:971–980.  https://doi.org/10.1163/1568562041526469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tarbuk A, Grancaric AM, Leskovac M (2014) Novel cotton cellulose by cationization during mercerization-part 2: the interface phenomena. Cellulose 21:2089–2099.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0194-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Teng X, Zhang S, Ma W (2011) Application of A hydrolyzable cationic agent, poly(acryloxyethyl trimethylammonium chloride), in salt-free reactive dyeing for good dyeing properties. J Appl Polym Sci 122:2741–2748.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Toprak T, Anis P, Kutlu E, Kara A (2018) Effect of chemical modification with 4-vinylpyridine on dyeing of cotton fabric with reactive dyestuff. Cellulose 25:6793–6809.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2026-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Verma M, Singh SSJ, Rose NM (2018) Effect of biopolymer treatment on the dyeing of cotton fabric with natural dye (onion skin). Int J Chem Stud 6:1715–1720Google Scholar
  59. Wang H, Lewis DM (2002) Chemical modification of cotton to improve fibre dyeability. Color Technol 118:159–168.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.2002.tb00094.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang L, Ma W, Zhang S et al (2009) Preparation of cationic cotton with two-bath pad-bake process and its application in salt-free dyeing. Carbohydr Polym 78:602–608.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.05.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Xing TL, Liu J, Chen GQ et al (2011) Study on finishing of cotton fabric by sericin and its properties. Adv Mater Res 175–176:624–628.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.175-176.624 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yang Y, Tang L, Tong L, Liu H (2009) Silkworms culture as a source of protein for humans in space. Adv Space Res 43:1236–1242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2008.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhaorıgetu S, Ssasakı M, Watanabe H, Kato N (2001) Supplemental silk protein, sericin, suppresses colon tumorigenesis in 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-treated mice by reducing oxidative stress and cell proliferation. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 65:2181–2186.  https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.65.2181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhou L, Shao J, Chai L, Fu G (2012) Adsorption behavior of annatto dye on cotton fabrics modified by sericin. Adv Mater Res 441:111–115.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.441.111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Textile Engineering Department, Faculty of EngineeringBursa Uludag UniversityBursaTurkey

Personalised recommendations