, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 3815–3824 | Cite as

Solid state fermentation process coupled biological pretreatment with cellulase production by Piptoporus betulinus for enhanced cellulose hydrolysis

  • Guanhua Li
  • Huifang Zhang
  • Yan Lu
  • Huiting XueEmail author
Original Research


An integrated process of cellulase production and pretreatment employing Piptoporus betulinus was proposed to accomplish economic feasibility of lignocellulosic ethanol. After 24 days of cultivation, the maximum loss of weight and hemicellulose of rice straw was 21.25% and 24.79%, respectively. The cellulose was degraded slightly and exposed. Furthermore, the modified lignin led to the weak interaction between lignin and hemicellulose. The optimized enzyme production for CMCase activity (58.37 U g−1 substrate) and FPase activity (7.43 U g−1 substrate) were obtained on the 12th day and the 18th day, respectively. Whereas, the highest reducing sugar yield of rice straw (392.96 mg g−1) was obtained on the 24th day, which was 2.82 times higher than that of the control with the reduced cellulase dosage of 37.15%. In this study pretreatment, cellulase production and enzymatic hydrolysis were coupled into one process, which opens an avenue for environmentally friendly and cost effective technology in lignocellulosic ethanol production.

Graphical abstract


Brown rot fungi Piptoporus betulinus Biological pretreatment Cellulase production Enzymatic hydrolysis 



This research received financial support from Key national research and development program (No. 2016YFD0300309), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21868018) and (No. 21766025).


  1. Aguiar A, Gavioli D, Ferraz A (2013) Extracellular activities and wood component losses during Pinus taeda biodegradation by the brown-rot fungus Gloeophyllum trabeum. Int Biodeter Biodegr 82:187–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deswal D, Khasa YP, Kuhad RC (2011) Optimization of cellulase production by a brown rot fungus Fomitopsis sp. RCK2010 under solid state fermentation. Bioresource Technol 102:6065–6072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Durmaz S, Özgenç Ö, Boyacı İH, Yıldız ÜC, Erişir E (2016) Examination of the chemical changes in spruce wood degraded by brown-rot fungi using FT-IR and FT-Raman spectroscopy. Vib Spectrosc 85:202–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. French AD, Cintrón MS (2013) Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and Segal crystallinity index. Cellulose 20:583–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ghose TK (1987) Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guo H, Chang Y, Lee DJ (2018) Enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biorefinery: research focuses. Bioresource Technol 252:198–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hegarty B, Steinfurth A, Liese W, Schmidt O (1987) Comparative investigations on wood decay and cellulolytic and xylanolytic activity of some basidiomycete fungi. Holzforschung 41:265–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hsu TC, Guo GL, Chen WH, Hwang WS (2010) Effect of dilute acid pretreatment of rice straw on structural properties and enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresource Technol 101:4907–4913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim SB, Lee SJ, Lee JH, Jung YR, Thapa LP, Kim JS, Um Y, Park C, Kim SW (2013) Pretreatment of rice straw with combined process using dilute sulfuric acid and aqueous ammonia. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim JS, Gao J, Daniel G (2015) Ultrastructure and immunocytochemistry of degradation in spruce and ash sapwood by the brown rot fungus Postia placenta: characterization of incipient stages of decay and variation. Int Biodeter Biodegr 103:161–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim H, Ahn Y, Kwak SY (2016) Comparing the influence of acetate and chloride anions on the structure of ionic liquid pretreated lignocellulosic biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 93:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. König J, Grasser R, Pikor H, Vogel K (2002) Determination of xylanase, β-glucanase, and cellulase activity. Anal Bioanal Chem 374:80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee JW, Kim HY, Koo BW, Choi DH, Kwon M, Choi JG (2008) Enzymatic saccharification of biologically pretreated Pinus densiflora using enzymes from brown rot fungi. J Biosci Bioeng 106:162–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li GH, Chen HZ (2014) Synergistic mechanism of steam explosion combined with fungal treatment by Phellinus baumii for the pretreatment of corn stalk. Biomass Bioenergy 67:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li GY, Huang LH, Hse CY, Qin TF (2011) Chemical compositions, infrared spectroscopy, and X-ray diffractometry study on brown-rotted woods. Carbohyd Polym 85:560–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li WY, Teck NA, Gek CN, Chua ASM (2014) Fungal solid-state fermentation and various methods of enhancement in cellulase production. Biomass Bioenergy 67:319–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li GH, He W, Yuan L (2017) Aqueous ammonia pretreatment of sugar beet pulp for enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 40:1603–1609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li GH, Sun Y, Guo W, Yuan L (2018) Comparison of various pretreatment strategies and their effect on chemistry and structure of sugar beet pulp. J Clean Prod 181:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meng XZ, Ragauskas AJ (2014) Recent advances in understanding the role of cellulose accessibility in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates. Curr Opin Biotech 27:150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Monrroy M, Ortega I, Ramírez M, Baeza J, Freer J (2011) Structural change in wood by brown rot fungi and effect on enzymatic hydrolysis. Enzyme Microb Technol 49:472–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pandey KK, Pitman AJ (2003) FTIR studies of the changes in wood chemistry following decay by brown-rot and white-rot fungi. Int Biodeter Biodegr 52:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Presley GN, Zhang J, Schilling JS (2018) A genomics-informed study of oxalate and cellulase regulation by brown rot wood-degrading fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 112:64–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rastogi M, Shrivastava S (2017) Recent advances in second generation bioethanol production: an insight to pretreatment, saccharification and fermentation processes. Renew Sust Energy Rev 80:330–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saha BC, Qureshi N, Kennedy GJ, Cotta MA (2016) Biological pretreatment of corn stover with white-rot fungus for improved enzymatic hydrolysis. Int Biodeter Biodegr 109:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saha BC, Kennedy GJ, Qureshi N, Cotta MA (2017) Biological pretreatment of corn stover with Phlebia brevispora NRRL-13108 for enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis and efficient ethanol production. Biotechnol Prog 33:365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-Ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stone J, Scallan A, Donefer E, Ahlgren E (1969) Digestibility as a simple function of a molecule of similar size to a cellulose enzyme. Adv Chem Ser 95:219–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Valášková V, Baldrian P (2006) Degradation of cellulose and hemicelluloses by the brown rot fungus Piptoporus betulinus–production of extracellular enzymes and characterization of the major cellulases. Microbiology 152:3613–3622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Van Soest PJ (1967) Development of a comprehensive system of feed analyses and its application to forages. J Anim Sci 26:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang W, Yuan T, Wang K, Cui B, Dai Y (2012) Statistical optimization of cellulase production by the brown rot fungi, Fomitopsis palustris, and its application in the enzymatic hydrolysis of LHW-pretreated woody biomass. Process Biochem 47:2552–2556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang R, You T, Yang G, Xu F (2017) Efficient short time white rot − brown rot fungal pretreatments for the enhancement of enzymatic saccharification of corn cobs. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:10849–10857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wong KKY, Deverell KF, Mackie KL, Clark TA, Donaldson LA (1988) The relationship between fiber-Porosity and cellulose digestibility in steam-exploded Pinus Radiata. Biotechnol Bioeng 31:447–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xu C, Ma F, Zhang X, Chen S (2010) Biological pretreatment of corn stover by Irpex lacteus for enzymatic hydrolysis. J Agric Food Chem 58:10893–10898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yu G, Yano S, Inoue H, Inoue S, Wang JL, Endo T (2014) Structural insights into rice straw pretreated by hot-compressed water in relation to enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 174:2278–2294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zabed H, Sahu JN, Suely A, Boyce AN, Faruq G (2017) Bioethanol production from renewable sources: current perspectives and technological progress. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 71:475–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang X, Yu H, Huang H, Liu Y (2007) Evaluation of biological pretreatment with white rot fungi for the enzymatic hydrolysis of bamboo culms. Int Biodeter Biodegr 60:159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, School of Life SciencesInner Mongolia UniversityHohhotChina
  2. 2.College of Basic MedicineInner Mongolia Medical UniversityHohhotChina

Personalised recommendations