, Volume 25, Issue 7, pp 4093–4106 | Cite as

Preparation of oil sorbents by solvent-free grafting of cellulose cotton fibers

  • Khalid Jarrah
  • Soleiman Hisaindee
  • Mohammad H. Al-Sayah
Original Paper


Natural cellulose-based fibers, such as cotton, have been investigated as oil sorbent to remediate and recover oil spills. The unmodified fibers are hydrophilic and have a high capacity to absorb water. To circumvent this drawback, the hydrophobicity of fibers is usually enhanced by chemical modification using solution-based processes that produce significant amounts of chemical waste. In the present study, gas–solid solvent-free silylation reaction was used to graft alkyl groups on cotton fibers. The modified cotton fibers were characterized by IR-spectroscopy, TGA analysis and SEM–EDS. The degree of substitution varied between 0.1 and 0.3 per glucose residue. The ability of the fibers to remove oil from the surface of simulated sea-water was investigated and all the modified fibers have adsorption capacity at least five times that of unmodified cotton. To optimize the adsorption capacity, factors that affect oil adsorption were investigated, namely the effect of fiber–oil contact time, temperature, and length of the grafted alkyl chains. Cotton fibers grafted with dialkyl substituted silyl ethers, through solvent-free silylation reaction, were found to have the best adsorption capacity of ~ 18 g oil/g of modified cotton with a fiber–oil contact time of 10 min at 25 °C.

Graphical abstract


Gas–solid silyl reaction Modified cellulose Hydrophobicity Oil pollution remediation Cotton 



The authors thank the Department of Chemistry at the United Arab Emirates University and the Department of Biology, Chemistry and Environmental Sciences at the American University of Sharjah for their technical support, and Mr. Essa Lwisa for providing help to measure the contact angles of the samples. M. A. thanks Gulf Ecosystems Research Center at the American University of Sharjah for the financial support (Grant No. GER-14-04).

Supplementary material

10570_2018_1846_MOESM1_ESM.docx (935 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 935 kb)


  1. Abdelmouleh M, Boufi S, Belgacem M, Duarte A, Salah AB, Gandini A (2004) Modification of cellulosic fibres with functionalised silanes: development of surface properties. Int J Adhes Adhes 24:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adebajo MO, Frost RL, Kloprogge JT, Carmody O, Kokot S (2003) Porous materials for oil spill cleanup: a review of synthesis and absorbing properties. J Porous Mater 10:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen A (1988) In-situ burning: a new technique for oil spill response. Spiltec, WoodinvilleGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Majed AA, Adebayo AR, Hossain ME (2012) A sustainable approach to controlling oil spills. J Environ Manag 113:213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atlas RM (1995) Petroleum biodegradation and oil spill bioremediation. Mar Pollut Bull 31:178–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balduzzi S, Brook MA (2000) Alkoxyallylsilanes: functional protecting groups. Tetrahedron 56:1617–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Board OS (2005) Oil spill dispersants: efficacy and effects. National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  8. Broje V, Keller AA (2007) Effect of operational parameters on the recovery rate of an oleophilic drum skimmer. J Hazard Mater 148:136–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brook M, Dawoud M (2005) Coastal water resources management in the United Arab Emirates. In: Integrated coastal zone management in the United Arab Emirates pp 1–12Google Scholar
  10. Buist I, Potter S, Nedwed T, Mullin J (2011) Herding surfactants to contract and thicken oil spills in pack ice for in situ burning. Cold Reg Sci Technol 67:3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chinga-Carrasco G, Kuznetsova N, Garaeva M, Leirset I, Galiullina G, Kostochko A, Syverud K (2012) Bleached and unbleached MFC nanobarriers: properties and hydrophobisation with hexamethyldisilazane. J Nanoparticle Res 14:1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi HM (1996) Needlepunched cotton nonwovens and other natural fibers as oil cleanup sorbents. J Environ Sci Health Part A 31:1441–1457Google Scholar
  13. Choi HM, Cloud RM (1992) Natural sorbents in oil spill cleanup. Environ Sci Technol 26:772–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cunha AG, Freire C, Silvestre A, Neto CP, Gandini A, Belgacem MN, Chaussy D, Beneventi D (2010) Preparation of highly hydrophobic and lipophobic cellulose fibers by a straightforward gas–solid reaction. J Colloid Interface Sci 344:588–595CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. De Palma R, Peeters S, Van Bael MJ, Van den Rul H, Bonroy K, Laureyn W, Mullens J, Borghs G, Maes G (2007) Silane ligand exchange to make hydrophobic superparamagnetic nanoparticles water-dispersible. Chem Mater 19:1821–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deschamps G, Caruel H, Borredon ME, Bonnin C, Vignoles C (2003) Oil removal from water by selective sorption on hydrophobic cotton fibers. 1. Study of sorption properties and comparison with other cotton fiber-based sorbents. Environ Sci Technol 37:1013–1015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. El-Maiss J, Darmanin T, Guittard F (2014) Branched versus linear perfluorocarbon chains in the formation of superhydrophobic electrodeposited films with low bioaccumulative potential. J Mater Sci 49:7760–7769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fadeev AY, McCarthy TJ (2000) Self-assembly is not the only reaction possible between alkyltrichlorosilanes and surfaces: monomolecular and oligomeric covalently attached layers of dichloro-and trichloroalkylsilanes on silicon. Langmuir 16:7268–7274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feng L, Li S, Li Y, Li H, Zhang L, Zhai J, Song Y, Liu B, Jiang L, Zhu D (2002) Super-hydrophobic surfaces: from natural to artificial. Adv Mater 14:1857–1860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fox SC, Li B, Xu D, Edgar KJ (2011) Regioselective esterification and etherification of cellulose: a review. Biomacromol 12:1956–1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grønli MG, Várhegyi G, Di Blasi C (2002) Thermogravimetric analysis and devolatilization kinetics of wood. Ind Eng Chem Res 41:4201–4208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta RK, Dunderdale GJ, England MW, Hozumi A (2017) Oil/water separation techniques: a review of recent progresses and future directions. J Mater Chem A 5:16025–16058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hassanzadeh S, Hajrasouliha O, Latifi AR, Nohegar A (2013) The Impact of Physical Processes on Oil Pollution Diffusion in the Persian Gulf. Environmental Forensics 14:312–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Isehunwa S, Udeagbara SG, Akpabio J (2011) Effect of temperature and contamination on the surface tension of niger delta crude oils. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 5:610–616Google Scholar
  25. Israelachvili J (2011) Intermolecular and surface forces, 3rd edn. Academic Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Jarre W, Marx M, Wurmb R (1979) POLYURETHANE FOAMS WITH HIGH CAPABILITY OF OIL ABSORPTION. Angew Makromol Chem 78:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kang JK, Musgrave CB (2001) The mechanism of HF/H2O chemical etching of SiO2. J Chem Phys 116:275–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karakoc G, Erkoc FU, Katiricoglu H (2003) Water quality and impacts of pollution sources for Eymir and Mogan Lakes (Turkey). Environ Int 29:21–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kumagai S, Noguchi Y, Kurimoto Y, Takeda K (2007) Oil adsorbent produced by the carbonization of rice husks. Waste Manag 27:554–561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lashkarbolooki M, Ayatollahi S (2018) Evaluation of effect of temperature and pressure on the dynamic interfacial tension of crude oil/aqueous solutions containing chloride anion through experimental and modelling approaches. Can J Chem Eng 96:1396–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lewis A, Trudel BK, Belore RC, Mullin JV (2010) Large-scale dispersant leaching and effectiveness experiments with oils on calm water. Mar Pollut Bull 60:244–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin C, Huang C-L, Shern C-C (2008) Recycling waste tire powder for the recovery of oil spills. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:1162–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lonfei J, Jingling W, Shuman X (1986) Mechanisms of pyrolysis of fluoropolymers. J Anal Appl Pyrol 10:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marion GM, Millero FJ, Camoes MF, Spitzer P, Feistel R, Chen CTA (2011) pH of seawater. Mar Chem 126:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nadim F, Bagtzoglou AC, Iranmahboob J (2008) Coastal management in the Persian Gulf region within the framework of the ROPME programme of action. Ocean Coast Manag 51:556–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nanda D, Swetha T, Varshney P, Gupta PK, Mohapatra SS, Kumar A (2017) Temperature dependent switchable superamphiphobic coating on steel alloy surface. J Alloy Compd 727:1293–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nomack M (2010) Oil spill control technologies. Retrieved from
  38. Oh MJ, Lee SY, Paik KH (2011) Preparation of hydrophobic self-assembled monolayers on paper surface with silanes. J Ind Eng Chem 17:149–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Osseo-Asare K (1996) Etching kinetics of silicon dioxide in aqueous fluoride solutions: a surface complexation model. J Electrochem Soc 143:1339–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oyola-Reynoso S, Wang Z, Chen J, Çınar S, Chang B, Thuo M (2015) Revisiting the challenges in fabricating uniform coatings with polyfunctional molecules on high surface energy materials. Coatings 5:1002–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oyola-Reynoso S, Chen J, Chang BS, Bloch JF, Thuo MM (2016a) Surface polymerization of perfluorosilane treatments on paper mitigates HF production upon incineration. Rsc Adv 6:82233–82237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oyola-Reynoso S, Tevis I, Chen J, Bloch JF, Thuo M (2016b) Fabrication of namib beetle inspired biomimetic amphi-phobic surfaces using adsorbed water as a monomer. Proc Eng 141:59–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parrott MC, Luft JC, Byrne JD, Fain JH, Napier ME, Desimone JM (2010) Tunable bifunctional silyl ether cross-linkers for the design of acid-sensitive biomaterials. J Am Chem Soc 132:17928–17932CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Parrott MC, Finniss M, Luft JC, Pandya A, Gullapalli A, Napier ME, Desimone JM (2012) Incorporation and controlled release of silyl ether prodrugs from PRINT nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 134:7978–7982CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Payne KC, Jackson CD, Aizpurua CE, Rojas OJ, Hubbe MA (2012) Oil spills abatement: factors affecting oil uptake by cellulosic fibers. Environ Sci Technol 46:7725–7730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Petzold K, Koschella A, Klemm D, Heublein B (2003) Silylation of cellulose and starch–selectivity, structure analysis, and subsequent reactions. Cellulose 10:251–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Plueddemann EP (2013) Silane coupling agents. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Raucher D, Levy M (1979) Thermal stability of homo- and copolymers of vinyl fluoride. J Polym Sci Polym Chem Edn 17:2675–2680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith AL (1974) Analysis of silicones. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  50. Sun X-F, Sun R, Sun J-X (2002) Acetylation of rice straw with or without catalysts and its characterization as a natural sorbent in oil spill cleanup. J Agric Food Chem 50:6428–6433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Suni S, Kosunen AL, Hautala M, Pasila A, Romantschuk M (2004) Use of a by-product of peat excavation, cotton grass fibre, as a sorbent for oil-spills. Mar Pollut Bull 49:916–921CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Tewari N, Verma V, Rai J (2006) Comparative evaluation of natural adsorbent for pollutants removal from distillery spent wash. J Sci Ind Res 65:935Google Scholar
  53. Vanem E, Endresen O, Skjong R (2008) Cost-effectiveness criteria for marine oil spill preventive measures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93:1354–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zadorozhnaya O, Kirsanov D, Buzhinsky I, Tsarev F, Abramova N, Bratov A, Munoz FJ, Ribo J, Bori J, Riva MC, Legin A (2015) Water pollution monitoring by an artificial sensory system performing in terms of Vibrio fischeri bacteria. Sens Actuators B-Chem 207:1069–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUnited Arab Emirates UniversityAl AinUAE
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Chemistry and Environmental SciencesAmerican University of SharjahSharjahUAE

Personalised recommendations