Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 7, pp 4001–4010 | Cite as

The effect of calendering on the mechanical properties of paper-based, self-reinforcing composites

  • Nils C. Hildebrandt
  • Petteri Piltonen
  • Jukka-Pekka Valkama
  • Mirja Illikainen
Original Paper
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, self-reinforcing composites (SRCs) were produced via the partial dissolution route with a NaOH/urea solvent from paper made of softwood sulphite dissolving and abaca pulp. Solvent welding leads to increased tensile strength due to gluing the fibres together with the dissolved portion of cellulose but does not densify the material completely. The resulting porosity makes it difficult to compare the obtained materials with other composites and gives the potential for optimizing the SRCs. Calendering, however, is a well-known and easy method to reduce the thickness of paper and therefore reduce the porosity, but the influence of calendering on the mechanical properties has not been widely studied for paper or for SRCs at this stage. The change of morphology and mechanical properties was investigated by calendering the untreated paper and the SRCs with nip pressures from 10 up to 200 kN/m and then comparing scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction, tensile strength and short-crush resistance. The SEM imaging indicated that calendering indeed densifies the paper and the SRCs by increasing the nip pressures, but tensile strength measurements showed that the strength of paper and SRCs increases for low nip pressures but significantly decreases for high nip pressures despite better densification. Furthermore, it was found that the elastic modulus can be increased by calendering, and short-crush resistance is not influenced by calendering at all.

Keywords

All-cellulose composites (ACC) Solvent-welded composites (SWC) Mechanical properties Calendering 

References

  1. Cao N-J, Xu Q, Chen C-S et al (1994) Cellulose hydrolysis using zinc chloride as a solvent and catalyst. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 45–46:521–530.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941827 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dawsey TR, McCormick CL (1990) The lithium chloride/dimethylacetamide solvent for cellulose: a literature review. J Macromol Sci Part C 30:405–440.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07366579008050914 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Duchemin BJC, Mathew AP, Oksman K (2009) All-cellulose composites by partial dissolution in the ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 40:2031–2037.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duchemin BJC, Le Corre D, Leray N et al (2016) All-cellulose composites based on microfibrillated cellulose and filter paper via a NaOH-urea solvent system. Cellulose 23:593–609.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0835-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gindl W, Keckes J (2005) All-cellulose nanocomposite. Polymer (Guildf) 46:10221–10225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2005.08.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hestmo RH (2001) Laboratory studies of paper calendering using a pendulum device. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  7. Hildebrandt NC, Piltonen P, Valkama J-P, Illikainen M (2017) Self-reinforcing composites from commercial chemical pulps via partial dissolution with NaOH/urea. Ind Crops Prod 109:79–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hubbe MA (2013) Prospects for maintaining strength of paper and paperboard products while using less forest resources: a review. BioResources 9:1634–1763.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.9.1.1634-1763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ma J, Wang Z, Zhou X, Xiao H (2015) Self-reinforced grease-resistant sheets produced by paper treatment with zinc chloride solution. BioResources 10:8225–8237.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.10.4.8225-8237 Google Scholar
  10. Mohan KK (2001) Method for calendering surface sized paper/paperboard to improve smoothnessGoogle Scholar
  11. Nam S, French AD, Condon BD, Concha M (2016) Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of X-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose Iβ and cellulose II. Carbohydr Polym 135:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nishino T, Arimoto N (2007) All-cellulose composite prepared by selective dissolving of fiber surface. Biomacromol 8:2712–2716.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0703416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nishino T, Matsuda I, Hirao K (2004) All-cellulose composite. Macromolecules 37:7683–7687.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma049300h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ouajai S, Shanks RA (2009) Preparation, structure and mechanical properties of all-hemp cellulose biocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 69:2119–2126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Piltonen P, Hildebrandt NC, Westerlind B et al (2016) Green and efficient method for preparing all-cellulose composites with NaOH/urea solvent. Compos Sci Technol 135:153–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.09.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. PlasticsEurope (2016) Plastics – the facts 2016. Report. https://www.plasticseurope.org/application/files/4315/1310/4805/plastic-the-fact-2016.pdf. Accessed 7 May 2018
  17. Shen L, Worrell E, Patel M (2010) Present and future development in plastics from biomass. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining 4:25–40.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shibata M, Teramoto N, Nakamura T, Saitoh Y (2013) All-cellulose and all-wood composites by partial dissolution of cotton fabric and wood in ionic liquid. Carbohydr Polym 98:1532–1539.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.07.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Solomon H, Ferenz R, Kennedy G, Staples R (1991) Developmental toxicity of dimethylacetamide by inhalation in the rat. Fundam Appl Toxicol 16:414–422.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-0590(91)90082-F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Soykeabkaew N, Nishino T, Peijs T (2009) All-cellulose composites of regenerated cellulose fibres by surface selective dissolution. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 40:321–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vernhes P, Bloch JF, Blayo A, Pineaux B (2009) Effect of calendering on paper surface micro-structure: a multi-scale analysis. J Mater Process Technol 209:5204–5210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ververis C, Georghiou K, Christodoulakis N et al (2004) Fiber dimensions, lignin and cellulose content of various plant materials and their suitability for paper production. Ind Crops Prod 19:245–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang N-G, Kim J, Chen Y et al (2004) Preparation of laboratory sheets for physical testing, Part 2: Rapid-Köthen method. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang N-G, Kim J, Chen Y et al (2006) Electro-active-paper actuator made with LiCl/cellulose films: effect of LiCl content. Macromol Res 14:624–629.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03218734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nils C. Hildebrandt
    • 1
    • 2
  • Petteri Piltonen
    • 2
  • Jukka-Pekka Valkama
    • 1
  • Mirja Illikainen
    • 2
  1. 1.Paper TechnologyBaden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State University KarlsruheKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Fibre and Particle EngineeringUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations