Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 2629–2645 | Cite as

Ultrasound-assisted conversion of cellulose into hydrogel and functional carbon material

  • Teck Wei Ching
  • Victoria Haritos
  • Akshat Tanksale
Original Paper

Abstract

Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) was fibrillated using an ultrasound probe to produce a hydrogel, which after freeze-drying and carbonisation under N2 atmosphere at elevated temperatures produced highly porous carbon. Ultrasound treatment in the absence of acid resulted in high aspect ratio, nanocrystalline cellulose due to fibrillation of the outer layers of the MCC fibre bundles, whereas in the presence of acid, cleavage of glycosidic bonds resulted in smaller aspect ratio fibres. Carbonisation of the acid-generated nanocrystalline cellulose samples at 800 °C provided the highest BET surface area of 917.0 m2/g, with over 18% pore volume in mesopores. The resulting high surface area carbon was able to absorb 100% of methylene blue in a solution having an initial concentration of 10 mg/L in 20 min which is comparable with many commercially available activated carbon products.

Graphical Abstract

Ultrasonication of microcrystalline cellulose resulted in nanocrystalline cellulose hydrogel which after freeze drying and carbonisation provided high surface area mesoporous carbon.

Keywords

Microcrystalline cellulose Ultrasound Nanocellulose hydrogel Carbonisation Dye adsorption 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Monash University Faculty of Engineering International Postgraduate Research Scholarship (FEIPRS) and CSIRO Flagship Collaboration Fund. The Authors acknowledge use of the facilities and assistance of Dr Timothy Williams and Dr Emily Chen at the Monash Centre for Electron Microscopy.

Authors’ contribution

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Altenor S, Carene B, Emmanuel E, Lambert J, Ehrhardt J-J, Gaspard S (2009) Adsorption studies of methylene blue and phenol onto vetiver roots activated carbon prepared by chemical activation. J Hazard Mater 165:1029–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basta A, Fierro V, El-Saied H, Celzard A (2009) 2-Steps KOH activation of rice straw: an efficient method for preparing high-performance activated carbons. Biores Technol 100:3941–3947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brinchi L, Cotana F, Fortunati E, Kenny J (2013) Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: technology and applications. Carbohyd Polym 94:154–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Budarin V, Clark JH, Hardy JJ, Luque R, Milkowski K, Tavener SJ, Wilson AJ (2006) Starbons: new starch-derived mesoporous carbonaceous materials with tunable properties. Angew Chem 118:3866–3870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Budarin VL, Clark JH, Luque R, Macquarrie DJ (2007) Versatile mesoporous carbonaceous materials for acid catalysis. Chem Commun 6:634–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cazetta AL et al (2011) NaOH-activated carbon of high surface area produced from coconut shell: kinetics and equilibrium studies from the methylene blue adsorption. Chem Eng J 174:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Celzard A, Marêché J, Payot F (2000) Simple method for characterizing synthetic graphite powders. J Phys D Appl Phys 33:1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakraborty A, Sain M, Kortschot M (2005) Cellulose microfibrils: a novel method of preparation using high shear refining and cryocrushing. Holzforschung 59:102–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen W, Yu H, Liu Y, Chen P, Zhang M, Hai Y (2011) Individualization of cellulose nanofibers from wood using high-intensity ultrasonication combined with chemical pretreatments. Carbohyd Polym 83:1804–1811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen A et al (2016) Synthesis of hollow mesoporous carbon spheres via “dissolution-capture” method for effective phenol adsorption. Carbon 103:157–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng Q, Wang S, Rials TG (2009) Poly (vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites reinforced with cellulose fibrils isolated by high intensity ultrasonication. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 40:218–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng Q, Wang S, Han Q (2010) Novel process for isolating fibrils from cellulose fibers by high-intensity ultrasonication. II. Fibril characterization. J Appl Polym Sci 115:2756–2762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cho M-J, Park B-D (2011) Tensile and thermal properties of nanocellulose-reinforced poly (vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites. J Ind Eng Chem 17:36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ciardelli G, Corsi L, Marcucci M (2001) Membrane separation for wastewater reuse in the textile industry. Resour Conserv Recycl 31:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooper P (1993) Removing colour from dyehouse waste waters—a critical review of technology available. Color Technol 109:97–100Google Scholar
  16. Dubinin M (1989) Fundamentals of the theory of adsorption in micropores of carbon adsorbents: characteristics of their adsorption properties and microporous structures. Carbon 27:457–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fan J, Li Y (2012) Maximizing the yield of nanocrystalline cellulose from cotton pulp fiber. Carbohydr Polym 88:1184–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fung P, Sin K, Tsui S (2000) Decolorisation and degradation kinetics of reactive dye wastewater by a UV/ultrasonic/peroxide system. Color Technol 116:170–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gatenholm P, Klemm D (2010) Bacterial nanocellulose as a renewable material for biomedical applications. MRS Bull 35:208–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. González I, Boufi S, Pèlach MA, Alcalà M, Vilaseca F, Mutjé P (2012) Nanofibrillated cellulose as paper additive in eucalyptus pulps. BioResources 7:5167–5180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110:3479–3500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hameed B, Din AM, Ahmad A (2007) Adsorption of methylene blue onto bamboo-based activated carbon: kinetics and equilibrium studies. J Hazard Mater 141:819–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund L, Lindström T (2007) An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur Polymer J 43:3434–3441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henriksson M, Berglund LA, Isaksson P, Lindstrom T, Nishino T (2008) Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromol 9:1579–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hsu YC, Chen JT, Yang HC, Chen JH (2001) Decolorization of dyes using ozone in gas-induced a reactor. AIChE J 47:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hu L et al (2013) Transparent and conductive paper from nanocellulose fibers. Energy Environ Sci 6:513–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ishii D, Saito T, Isogai A (2011) Viscoelastic evaluation of average length of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromol 12:548–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H, Nogi M (2005) Optically transparent composites reinforced with plant fiber-based nanofibers. Appl Phys A 81:1109–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jia Z, Li Z, Li S, Li Y, Zhu R (2016) Adsorption performance and mechanism of methylene blue on chemically activated carbon spheres derived from hydrothermally-prepared poly (vinyl alcohol) microspheres. J Mol Liq 220:56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kadam AA, Lee DS (2015) Glutaraldehyde cross-linked magnetic chitosan nanocomposites: reduction precipitation synthesis, characterization, and application for removal of hazardous textile dyes. Biores Technol 193:563–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kannan N, Sundaram MM (2001) Kinetics and mechanism of removal of methylene blue by adsorption on various carbons—a comparative study. Dyes Pigm 51:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Karagöz S, Tay T, Ucar S, Erdem M (2008) Activated carbons from waste biomass by sulfuric acid activation and their use on methylene blue adsorption. Biores Technol 99:6214–6222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kerekes R, Schell C (1992) Characterization of fibre flocculation regimes by a crowding factor. J Pulp Paper Sci 18:J32–J38Google Scholar
  34. Kim S-j, Jang J (2013) Effect of degree of polymerization on the mechanical properties of regenerated cellulose fibers using synthesized 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride. Fibers Polym 14:909–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kondo T, Kose R, Naito H, Kasai W (2014) Aqueous counter collision using paired water jets as a novel means of preparing bio-nanofibers. Carbohydr Polym 112:284–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Korhonen JT, Kettunen M, Ras RH, Ikkala O (2011) Hydrophobic nanocellulose aerogels as floating, sustainable, reusable, and recyclable oil absorbents. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:1813–1816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kose R, Kondo T (2011) Favorable 3D-network formation of chitin nanofibers dispersed in water prepared using aqueous counter collision. Sen’i Gakkaishi 67:91–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lan W, Liu C-F, Yue F-X, Sun R-C, Kennedy JF (2011) Ultrasound-assisted dissolution of cellulose in ionic liquid. Carbohydr Polym 86:672–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee S-Y, Chun S-J, Kang I-A, Park J-Y (2009) Preparation of cellulose nanofibrils by high-pressure homogenizer and cellulose-based composite films. J Ind Eng Chem 15:50–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li J et al (2012a) Homogeneous isolation of nanocellulose from sugarcane bagasse by high pressure homogenization. Carbohyd Polym 90:1609–1613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li W, Yue J, Liu S (2012b) Preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose via ultrasound and its reinforcement capability for poly (vinyl alcohol) composites. Ultrason Sonochem 19:479–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lücking F, Köser H, Jank M, Ritter A (1998) Iron powder, graphite and activated carbon as catalysts for the oxidation of 4-chlorophenol with hydrogen peroxide in aqueous solution. Water Res 32:2607–2614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mahadeva SK, Yi C, Kim J (2011) Electrical and electromechanical properties of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis (trifluoromethylsulfonyl) imide-blended cellulose. Ionics 17:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Malik PK (2004) Dye removal from wastewater using activated carbon developed from sawdust: adsorption equilibrium and kinetics. J Hazard Mater 113:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martinez D et al (2001) Characterizing the mobility of papermaking fibres during sedimentation. In: The science of papermaking: transactions of the 12th fundamental research symposium, Oxford. The Pulp and Paper Fundamental Research Society, Bury, UK, pp 225–254Google Scholar
  46. McCormick CL, Callais PA, Hutchinson BH Jr (1985) Solution studies of cellulose in lithium chloride and N,N-dimethylacetamide. Macromolecules 18:2394–2401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mckay G, Otterburn M, Sweeney A (1980) The removal of colour from effluent using various adsorbents—III. Silica: rate processes. Water Res 14:15–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McKee JR, Hietala S, Seitsonen J, Laine J, Kontturi E, Ikkala O (2014) Thermoresponsive nanocellulose hydrogels with tunable mechanical properties. ACS Macro Lett 3:266–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mishra SP, Manent A-S, Chabot B, Daneault C (2011) Production of nanocellulose from native cellulose—various options utilizing ultrasound. BioResources 7:0422–0436Google Scholar
  50. Nakagaito A, Yano H (2004) The effect of morphological changes from pulp fiber towards nano-scale fibrillated cellulose on the mechanical properties of high-strength plant fiber based composites. Appl Phys A 78:547–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Namasivayam C, Kavitha D (2002) Removal of Congo Red from water by adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from coir pith, an agricultural solid waste. Dyes Pigm 54:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nguyen-Le M-T, Lee B-K (2015) High temperature synthesis of interfacial functionalized carboxylate mesoporous TiO2 for effective adsorption of cationic dyes. Chem Eng J 281:20–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. O’Neill C, Hawkes FR, Hawkes DL, Lourenço ND, Pinheiro HM, Delée W (1999) Colour in textile effluents—sources, measurement, discharge consents and simulation: a review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 74:1009–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pappas C, Tarantilis P, Daliani I, Mavromoustakos T, Polissiou M (2002) Comparison of classical and ultrasound-assisted isolation procedures of cellulose from kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus rodustrus Sm.). Ultrason Sonochem 9:19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pereira MFR, Soares SF, Órfão JJ, Figueiredo JL (2003) Adsorption of dyes on activated carbons: influence of surface chemical groups. Carbon 41:811–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Perkins WS, Walsh W, Reed I, Namboodri C (1996) A demonstration of reuse of spent dyebath water following color removal with ozone. Text Chem Colorist 28:31–37Google Scholar
  57. Punzi M, Anbalagan A, Börner RA, Svensson B-M, Jonstrup M, Mattiasson B (2015) Degradation of a textile azo dye using biological treatment followed by photo-Fenton oxidation: evaluation of toxicity and microbial community structure. Chem Eng J 270:290–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Revol J, Dietrich A, Goring D (1987) Effect of mercerization on the crystallite size and crystallinity index in cellulose from different sources. Can J Chem 65:1724–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Robinson T, Chandran B, Nigam P (2002) Removal of dyes from a synthetic textile dye effluent by biosorption on apple pomace and wheat straw. Water Res 36:2824–2830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sabio E, González E, González J, González-Garcıa C, Ramiro A, Ganan J (2004) Thermal regeneration of activated carbon saturated with p-nitrophenol. Carbon 42:2285–2293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux J-L, Vignon M, Isogai A (2006) Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromol 7:1687–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shrotri A, Lambert LK, Tanksale A, Beltramini J (2013) Mechanical depolymerisation of acidulated cellulose: understanding the solubility of high molecular weight oligomers. Green Chem 15:2761–2768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sing KS (1985) Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure Appl Chem 57:603–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Siró I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17:459–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ, Habibi Y, Pawlak JJ (2011) A comparative study of energy consumption and physical properties of microfibrillated cellulose produced by different processing methods. Cellulose 18:1097–1111.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9533-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Suslick KS, Price GJ (1999) Applications of ultrasound to materials chemistry. Annu Rev Mater Sci 29:295–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tang L, Huang B, Ou W, Chen X, Chen Y (2011) Manufacture of cellulose nanocrystals by cation exchange resin-catalyzed hydrolysis of cellulose. Biores Technol 102:10973–10977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tian C, Yi J, Wu Y, Wu Q, Qing Y, Wang L (2016) Preparation of highly charged cellulose nanofibrils using high-pressure homogenization coupled with strong acid hydrolysis pretreatments. Carbohydr Polym 136:485–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tischer PCF, Sierakowski MR, Westfahl H Jr, Tischer CA (2010) Nanostructural reorganization of bacterial cellulose by ultrasonic treatment. Biomacromol 11:1217–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Uygur A, Kök E (1999) Decolorisation treatments of azo dye waste waters including dichlorotriazinyl reactive groups by using advanced oxidation method. Color Technol 115:350–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Valix M, Cheung W, McKay G (2004) Preparation of activated carbon using low temperature carbonisation and physical activation of high ash raw bagasse for acid dye adsorption. Chemosphere 56:493–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Varanasi S, He R, Batchelor W (2013) Estimation of cellulose nanofibre aspect ratio from measurements of fibre suspension gel point. Cellulose 20:1885–1896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. White RJ, Budarin V, Luque R, Clark JH, Macquarrie DJ (2009) Tuneable porous carbonaceous materials from renewable resources. Chem Soc Rev 38:3401–3418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wu F-C, Tseng R-L (2008) High adsorption capacity NaOH-activated carbon for dye removal from aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater 152:1256–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Xie X, Goodell B, Zhang D, Nagle DC, Qian Y, Peterson ML, Jellison J (2009) Characterization of carbons derived from cellulose and lignin and their oxidative behavior. Biores Technol 100:1797–1802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Xiong R, Zhang X, Tian D, Zhou Z, Lu C (2012) Comparing microcrystalline with spherical nanocrystalline cellulose from waste cotton fabrics. Cellulose 19:1189–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rodriguez Correa C, Stollovsky M, Hehr T, Rauscher Y, Rolli B, Kruse A (2017) Influence of the carbonization process on activated carbon properties from lignin and lignin-rich biomasses. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:8222–8233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zander NE, Dong H, Steele J, Grant JT (2014) Metal cation cross-linked nanocellulose hydrogels as tissue engineering substrates. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:18502–18510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhang L, Batchelor W, Varanasi S, Tsuzuki T, Wang X (2012) Effect of cellulose nanofiber dimensions on sheet forming through filtration. Cellulose 19:561–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zhang Q, Benoit M, Vigier KDO, Barrault J, Jégou G, Philippe M, Jérôme F (2013) Pretreatment of microcrystalline cellulose by ultrasounds: effect of particle size in the heterogeneously-catalyzed hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose. Green Chem 15:963–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations