, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 2829–2837 | Cite as

Control of the morphology of cellulose acetate nanofibers via electrospinning

  • Hoik Lee
  • Masayoshi Nishino
  • Daewon Sohn
  • Jung Soon Lee
  • Ick Soo Kim
Original Paper


The morphologies of cellulose acetate (CA) nanofibers were studied in relation to various factors, i.e., the composition of the solvent; the concentration of the polymer; and the solubility of the solvent and the polymer. Also, we incorporated polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) in the CA nanofibers to modulate the morphology to some extent. We used mixtures of the solvents dimethylformamide (DMF) and acetone at volume ratios of 6:4, 4:6 and 2:8, and we also used mixtures of the solvents dichloromethane (DCM) and acetone at the volume ratio of 3:1. The mixture of DMF/acetone can be used to fabricate very smooth, bead-free CA nanofibers in the proper concentration of polymer. It was remarkable that the higher volume ratios of the good solvent (DMF) required higher polymer concentrations for the successful fabrication of nanofibers. This result implies that the quality of the solvent affects the formation of the nanofibers. In addition, porous CA nanofibers can be fabricated with the DCM/acetone solvent mixture through electrospinning. In this case, the surface roughness of the fabricated nanofibers could be adjusted by varying the concentration of the polymer. Hot water treatment of the CA nanofibers with PVP incorporated can be used to control the morphology of the nanofibers. These results confirmed that these methods are straightforward and facile and that it can be used to control the morphology of CA nanofibers, thereby broadening the application of CA nanofibers.

Graphical Abstract


Morphology Cellulose acetate Nanofibers Solvent selection Hot water treatment 



We gratefully acknowledge the support from Division of Frontier Fibers, Institute for Fiber Engineering (IFES), Interdisciplinary Cluster for Cutting Edge Research (ICCER) at Shinshu University.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Atila D, Keskin D, Tezcaner A (2015) Cellulose acetate based 3-dimensional electrospun scaffolds for skin tissue engineering applications. Carbohydr Polym 133:251–261. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton AFM (1975) Solubility parameters. Chem Rev 75:731–753. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chakraborty S, Liao IC, Adler A, Leong KW (2009) Electrohydrodynamics: a facile technique to fabricate drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:1043–1054. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deitzel JM, Kleinmeyer J, Harris D, Beck Tan NC (2001) The effect of processing variables on the morphology of electrospun nanofibers and textiles. Polymer 42:261–272. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Entcheva E, Bien H, Yin L, Chung C-Y, Farrell M, Kostov Y (2004) Functional cardiac cell constructs on cellulose-based scaffolding. Biomaterials 25:5753–5762. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gopiraman M, Deng D, Saravanamoorthy S, Chung I-M, Kim IS (2018) Gold, silver and nickel nanoparticle anchored cellulose nanofiber composites as highly active catalysts for the rapid and selective reduction of nitrophenols in water. RSC Adv 8:3014–3023. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Han T, Yarin AL, Reneker DH (2008) Viscoelastic electrospun jets: initial stresses and elongational rheometry. Polymer 49:1651–1658. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang Z-M, Zhang YZ, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S (2003) A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 63:2223–2253. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Konios D, Stylianakis MM, Stratakis E, Kymakis E (2014) Dispersion behaviour of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. J Colloid Interface Sci 430:108–112. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koo CM, Ham HT, Choi MH, Kim SO, Chung IJ (2003) Characteristics of polyvinylpyrrolidone-layered silicate nanocomposites prepared by attrition ball milling. Polymer 44:681–689. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee H, Koo JM, Sohn D, Kim I-S, Im SS (2016a) High thermal stability and high tensile strength terpolyester nanofibers containing biobased monomer: fabrication and characterization. RSC Adv 6:40383–40388. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee H, Watanabe K, Kim M, Gopiraman M, Song K-H, Lee JS, Kim IS (2016b) Handspinning enabled highly concentrated carbon nanotubes with controlled orientation in nanofibers. Sci Rep 6:37590. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee H, Kim M, Sohn D, Kim SH, Oh S-G, Im SS, Kim IS (2017a) Electrospun tungsten trioxide nanofibers decorated with palladium oxide nanoparticles exhibiting enhanced photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv 7:6108–6113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee H, Xu G, Kharaghani D, Nishino M, Song KH, Lee JS, Kim IS (2017b) Electrospun tri-layered zein/PVP-GO/zein nanofiber mats for providing biphasic drug release profiles. Int J Pharm 531:101–107. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee H et al (2017c) Enhancement of mechanical properties of polymeric nanofibers by controlling crystallization behavior using a simple freezing/thawing process. RSC Adv 7:43994–44000. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu H, Hsieh Y-L (2002) Ultrafine fibrous cellulose membranes from electrospinning of cellulose acetate. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 40:2119–2129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu H, Tang C (2006) Electrospinning of cellulose acetate in solvent mixture N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc)/acetone. Polym J 39:65. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu J, Liu T, Kumar S (2005) Effect of solvent solubility parameter on SWNT dispersion in PMMA. Polymer 46:3419–3424. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ma Z, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S (2005) Electrospun cellulose nanofiber as affinity membrane. J Membr Sci 265:115–123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martin A, Newburger J, Adjei A (1980) Extended hildebrand solubility approach: solubility of theophylline in polar binary solvents. J Pharm Sci 69:487–491. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peresin MS, Habibi Y, Zoppe JO, Pawlak JJ, Rojas OJ (2010) Nanofiber composites of polyvinyl alcohol and cellulose nanocrystals: manufacture and characterization. Biomacromolecules 11:674–681. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Phan D-N, Lee H, Choi D, Kang C-Y, Im S, Kim I (2018) Fabrication of two polyester nanofiber types containing the biobased monomer isosorbide: poly (ethylene glycol 1,4-cyclohexane dimethylene isosorbide terephthalate) and poly (1,4-cyclohexane dimethylene isosorbide terephthalate). Nanomaterials 8:56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shenoy SL, Bates WD, Frisch HL, Wnek GE (2005) Role of chain entanglements on fiber formation during electrospinning of polymer solutions: good solvent, non-specific polymer–polymer interaction limit. Polymer 46:3372–3384. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Son WK, Youk JH, Park WH (2006) Antimicrobial cellulose acetate nanofibers containing silver nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 65:430–434. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Song H et al (2006) Hydrothermal growth of mesoporous SBA-15 silica in the presence of PVP-stabilized Pt nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and catalytic properties. J Am Chem Soc 128:3027–3037. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Teo WE, Ramakrishna S (2006) A review on electrospinning design and nanofibre assemblies. Nanotechnology 17:R89. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tungprapa S et al (2007) Electrospun cellulose acetate fibers: effect of solvent system on morphology and fiber diameter. Cellulose 14:563–575. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang W, Sousa AMM, Fan X, Jin T, Li X, Tomasula PM, Liu L (2017) Electrospun ultra-fine cellulose acetate fibrous mats containing tannic acid-Fe3+ complexes. Carbohydr Polym 157:1173–1179. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yoon JW, Park Y, Kim J, Park CH (2017) Multi-jet electrospinning of polystyrene/polyamide 6 blend: thermal and mechanical properties. Fash Text 4:9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zeman L, Fraser T (1993) Formation of air-cast cellulose acetate membranes. Part I. Study of macrovoid formation. J Membr Sci 84:93–106. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang L, Menkhaus TJ, Fong H (2008) Fabrication and bioseparation studies of adsorptive membranes/felts made from electrospun cellulose acetate nanofibers. J Membr Sci 319:176–184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nano Fusion Technology Research Group, Division of Frontier Fibers, Institute for Fiber Engineering (IFES), Interdisciplinary Cluster for Cutting Edge Research (ICCER)Shinshu UniversityNaganoJapan
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryHanyang UniversitySeoulKorea
  3. 3.Department of Clothing and TextilesChungnam National UniversityDaejeonKorea

Personalised recommendations