Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 24, Issue 10, pp 4291–4302 | Cite as

Facile preparation of a cellulose microfibers–exfoliated graphite composite: a robust sensor for determining dopamine in biological samples

  • Selvakumar Palanisamy
  • Pan Yi-Fan
  • Shen-Ming ChenEmail author
  • Vijayalakshmi VelusamyEmail author
  • James M. Hall
Original Paper

Abstract

A simple and robust dopamine (DA) sensor was developed using a cellulose microfibers (CMF)–exfoliated graphite composite-modified screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) for the first time. The graphite-CMF composite was prepared by sonication of pristine graphite in CMF solution and was characterized by high-resolution scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform, infrared, and Raman spectroscopy. The cyclic voltammetry results reveal that the graphite-CMF composite modified SPCE has superior electrocatalytic activity against oxidation of dopamine than SPCE modified with pristine graphite and CMF. The presence of large edge plane defects on exfoliated graphite and abundant oxygen functional groups of CMF enhance electrocatalytic activity and decrease potential to oxidize DA. Differential pulse voltammetry was used to quantify DA using the graphite-CMF composite-modified SPCE and demonstrated a linear response for DA detection in the range of 0.06–134.5 µM. The sensor shows a detection limit at 10 nM with an appropriate sensitivity and displays appropriate recovery of DA in human serum samples with good repeatability. Sensor selectivity is demonstrated in the presence of 50-fold concentrations of potentially active interfering compounds including ascorbic acid, uric acid, and dihydroxybenzene isomers.

Keywords

Exfoliated graphite Cellulose microfibers Functional composite Dopamine Electrochemical sensor 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Republic of China). Authors are thankful to the department of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology for providing the high-resolution SEM and elemental mapping facility.

References

  1. Abdulkhani A, Marvast EH, Ashori A et al (2013) Preparation of cellulose/polyvinyl alcohol biocomposite films using 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride. Int J Biol Macromol 62:379–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caetano FR, Felippe LB, Zarbin AJG et al (2017) Gold nanoparticles supported on multi-walled carbon nanotubes produced by biphasic modified method and dopamine sensing application. Sens Actuators B 243:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carrasco PM, Montes S, García I et al (2014) High-concentration aqueous dispersions of graphene produced by exfoliation of graphite using cellulose nanocrystals. Carbon 70:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Choi W, Lahiri I, Seelaboyin R et al (2010) Synthesis of graphene and its applications: a review. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci 35:52–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daemia S, Ashkarrana AA, Baharia A et al (2017) Gold nanocages decorated biocompatible amine functionalized graphene as an efficient dopamine sensor platform. J Colloid Interface Sci 494:290–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fang J, Xie Z, Wallace G et al (2017) Co-deposition of carbon dots and reduced graphene oxide nanosheets on carbon-fiber microelectrode surface for selective detection of dopamine. Appl Surf Sci 412:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Galvan A, Wichmann T (2008) Pathophysiology of parkinsonism. Clin Neurophysiol 119:1459–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gui Z, Zhu H, Gillette E et al (2013) Natural cellulose fiber as substrate for supercapacitor. ACS Nano 7:6037–6046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haldorai Y, Ezhil Vilian AT, Rethinasabapathy M et al (2017) Electrochemical determination of dopamine using a glassy carbon electrode modified with TiN-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite. Sens Actuators B 247:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jackowska K, Krysinski P (2013) New trends in the electrochemical sensing of dopamine. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:3753–3771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacobs CB, Peairs MJ, Venton BJ (2010) Review: carbon nanotube based electrochemical sensors for biomolecules. Anal Chim Acta 662:105–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ku S, Palanisamy S, Chen SM (2013) Highly selective dopamine electrochemical sensor based on electrochemically pretreated graphite and nafion composite modified screen printed carbon electrode. J Colloid Interface Sci 411:182–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu Y, Huang J, Hou H et al (2008) Simultaneous determination of dopamine, ascorbic acid and uric acid with electrospun carbon nanofibers modified electrode. Electrochem Commun 10:1431–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Malho JM, Laaksonen P, Walther A et al (2012) Facile method for stiff, tough, and strong nanocomposites by direct exfoliation of multilayered graphene into native nanocellulose matrix. Biomacromol 13:1093–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mo JW, Ogorevc B (2001) Simultaneous measurement of dopamine and ascorbate at their physiological levels using voltammetric microprobe based on overoxidized poly(1,2-phenylenediamine)-coated carbon fiber. Anal Chem 73:1196–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Özerol EA, Senkal BF, Okutan M (2015) Preparation and characterization of graphite composites of polyaniline. Microelectron Eng 146:76–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Palanisamy S, Ku S, Chen SM (2013) Dopamine sensor based on a glassy carbon electrode modified with a reduced graphene oxide and palladium nanoparticles composite. Microchim Acta 180:1037–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Palanisamy S, Sakthinathan S, Chen SM et al (2016a) Preparation of β-cyclodextrin entrapped graphite composite for sensitive detection of dopamine. Carbohydr Polym 135:267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Palanisamy S, Thangavelu K, Chen SM et al (2016b) Preparation of chitosan grafted graphite composite for sensitive detection of dopamine in biological samples. Carbohydr Polym 151:401–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Palanisamy S, Thangavelu K, Chen SM et al (2016c) Preparation and characterization of gold nanoparticles decorated on graphene oxide@ polydopamine composite: application for sensitive and low potential detection of catechol. Sens Actuators B 233:298–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Palanisamy S, Ramaraj SK, Chen SM et al (2017) A novel laccase biosensor based on laccase immobilized graphene-cellulose microfiber composite modified screen-printed carbon electrode for sensitive determination of catechol. Sci Rep 7:41214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paleček E (2002) Past, present and future of nucleic acids electrochemistry. Talanta 56:809–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pandikumar A, How GTS, See TP et al (2014) Graphene and its nanocomposite material based electrochemical sensor platform for dopamine. RSC Adv 4:63296–63323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rahman MM, Lop NS, Ju MJ et al (2017) Highly sensitive and simultaneous detection of dopamine and uric acid at graphene nanoplatelet-modified fluorine-doped tin oxide electrode in the presence of ascorbic acid. J Electroanal Chem 792:54–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ruiz-Palomero C, Soriano ML, Valcarcel M (2017) Nanocellulose as analyte and analytical tool: opportunities and challenges. Trends Anal Chem 87:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sajid M, Nazal MK, Mansha M et al (2016) Chemically modified electrodes for electrochemical detection of dopamine in the presence of uric acid and ascorbic acid: a review. Trends Anal Chem 76:15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shanbhag D, Bindu K, Aarathy AR et al (2017) Hydrothermally synthesized reduced graphene oxide and Sn doped manganese dioxide nanocomposites for supercapacitors and dopamine sensors. Mater Today Energy 4:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shrivastava S, Jadon N, Jain R (2016) Next-generation polymer nanocomposite-based electrochemical sensors and biosensors: a review. Trends Anal Chem 82:55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thirumalraj B, Palanisamy S, Chen SM et al (2015) Direct electrochemistry of glucose oxidase and sensing of glucose at a glassy carbon electrode modified with a reduced graphene oxide/fullerene-C60 composite. RSC Adv 5:77651–77657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thirumalraj B, Palanisamy S, Chen SM (2016) Alumina polished glassy carbon electrode as a simple electrode for lower potential electrochemical detection of dopamine in its sub-micromolar level. Electroanalysis 28:425–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vellaichamy B, Periakaruppan P (2016) A facile in situ synthesis of highly active and reusable ternary Ag-PPy-GO nanocomposite for catalytic oxidation of hydroquinone in aqueous solution. J Catal 344:795–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vellaichamy B, Periakaruppan P, Ponnaiah SK (2017a) A new in situ synthesized ternary CuNPs-PANI-GO nano composite for selective detection of carcinogenic hydrazine. Sens Actuators B 245:156–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vellaichamy B, Periakaruppan P, Paulmony T (2017b) Evaluation of a new biosensor based on in situ synthesized PPy-Ag-PVP nanohybrid for selective detection of dopamine. J Phys Chem B 121:1118–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang J, Yang B, Zhong J et al (2017) Dopamine and uric acid electrochemical sensor based on a glassy carbon electrode modified with cubic Pd and reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite. J Colloid Interface Sci 497:172–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xu B, Su Y, Li L et al (2017) Thiol-functionalized single-layered MoS2 nanosheet as a photoluminescence sensing platform via charge transfer for dopamine detection. Sens Actuators B 246:380–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang C, Denno ME, Pyakurel P et al (2015) Recent trends in carbon nanomaterial-based electrochemical sensors for biomolecules: a review. Anal Chim Acta 887:17–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang Z, Zheng X, Zheng J (2017) A facile one-step synthesis of Fe2O3/nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for enhanced electrochemical determination of dopamine. J Alloys Compd 709:581–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang YM, Xu PL, Zeng Q et al (2017) Magnetism-assisted modification of screen printed electrode with magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes for electrochemical determination of dopamine. Mate Sci Eng C 74:62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electroanalysis and Bioelectrochemistry Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering and BiotechnologyNational Taipei University of TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Division of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, School of EngineeringManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations