Enhanced properties of poly(ethylene oxide)/cellulose nanofiber biocomposites
- 771 Downloads
Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)/cellulose nanofiber (CNF) biocomposites were developed using a simple aqueous solution technique. A PEO/CNF composite was also produced in the molten state to compare different preparations. The effects of nanofibers on different properties of PEO including rheological, thermal, mechanical and optical were investigated. For the sample prepared in the molten state, no change in properties was observed as compared to the neat matrix. On the other hand, for the solution-based samples, scanning electron microscopy revealed good dispersion/distribution of nanofibers in the PEO, which resulted in a significant increase of the rheological properties and also a notable shear-thinning behavior. A liquid- to solid-like behavior transition along with the observation of apparent yield stress suggested the formation of a strong CNF 3D network. The Young’s modulus and tensile strength of PEO with 3 wt% CNFs were enhanced by 49 and 35%, respectively, compared to the neat PEO. The storage modulus of PEO was significantly improved for all tested temperatures in the dynamic mechanical thermal analysis; at room temperature that corresponds to the rubbery region, a 47% enhancement was observed by incorporating 3 wt% nanofibers. Also, PEO/CNF composites demonstrated good optical transmittance, which is generally not the case with many reinforcements. These results show that PEO/CNF biocomposites with good mechanical and optical properties can be fabricated via a simple aqueous solution technique.
KeywordsBiocomposites Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) Cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) Rheology Crystallinity Mechanical properties Transparency
The authors are greatly thankful for the financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and Network for Innovative Plastic Materials and Manufacturing Processes (NIPMMP). They also appreciated the reviewers’ helpful comments.
- Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich NE, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C, Thielemans W, Roman M, Renneckar S, Gindl W, Veigel S, Keckes J, Yano H, Abe K, Nogi M, Nakagaito AN, Mangalam A, Simonsen J, Benight AS, Bismarck A, Berglund LA, Peijs T (2010) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45:1–33. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3874-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hamad WY, Miao C (2014) Nanocomposite biomaterials of nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) and polylactic acid (PLA). US 8,829,110 B2Google Scholar
- Wang B, Sain M (2007) The effect of chemically coated nanofiber reinforcement on biopolymer based nanocomposites. Bioresources 2:371–388Google Scholar
- Wang S, Cheng Q, Rials TG, Lee SH (2006) Cellulose microfibril/nanofibril and its nanocompsites. The 8th Pacific rim bio-based composites symposium, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 20–23. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, pp 301–308Google Scholar
- Xu X, Wang H, Jiang L, Wang X, Payne SA, Zhu JY, Li R (2014) Comparison between cellulose nanocrystal and cellulose nanofibril reinforced poly(ethylene oxide) nanofibers and their novel shish-kebab-like crystalline structures. Macromolecules 47:3409–3416. doi: 10.1021/ma402627j CrossRefGoogle Scholar