Skip to main content

Optimization of sulfuric acid hydrolysis conditions for preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose from enzymatically pretreated fibers

Cellulose volume 23, pages 1777–1789 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) by 62 and 65 % wt. sulfuric acid hydrolysis of cellulase-pretreated fibers was optimized to obtain the highest yield by applying two statistical plans. At optimal conditions (10 U/g odp cellulase, 25 min hydrolysis, 47 °C, 62 wt.% H2SO4), high yields (≥80 %) were obtained, including an increase of ~9 points due to the enzyme. Optimal conditions produced nanosized particles of around ~200 nm with reduced surface charge and sulfur content. The optimization allowed reduction of hydrolysis time by 44 % and increase of yield by more than 10 points compared with results in previous work. The effects of cellulase pretreatment were noticeable even under aggressive hydrolysis conditions, emphasizing its possibilities. Zeta potential and polydispersity index indicated that all studied conditions led to good-quality final products, with values around −50 mV and 0.2, respectively. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis confirmed the presence of NCC. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic analysis provided evidence that cellulase treatment increased the crystallinity of both cellulose fibers and NCC, as well as fiber accessibility, supporting the other analyses of NCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Abbreviations

C:

Cellulase-treated fibers

C_NCC:

NCC obtained from cellulase-pretreated fibers

CMC:

Carboxymethylcellulose

FTIR:

Fourier-transform infrared

KC:

Control fibers

KC_NCC:

NCC obtained from control fibers

NCC:

Nanocrystalline cellulose

Opd:

Oven-dried pulp

LOI:

Lateral order index

TCI:

Total crystallinity index

U:

Enzymatic activity unit

References

  • Abitbol T, Kloser E, Gray DG (2013) Estimation of the surface sulfur content of cellulose nanocrystals prepared by sulfuric acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 20:785–794

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahola S, Turon X, Osterberg M et al (2008) Enzymatic hydrolysis of native cellulose nanofibrils and other cellulose model films: effect of surface structure. Langmuir 24:11592–11599. doi:10.1021/la801550j

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves L, Medronho B, Antunes FE et al (2014) Unusual extraction and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose from cellulose derivatives. J Mol Liq. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2014.12.010

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson SR, Esposito D, Gillette W et al (2014) Enzymatic preparation of nanocrystalline and microcrystalline cellulose. Tappi J 13:35–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beltramino F, Roncero MB, Vidal T et al (2015a) Increasing yield of nanocrystalline cellulose preparation process by a cellulase pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 192:574–581. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.007

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beltramino F, Valls C, Vidal T, Roncero MB (2015b) Exploring the effects of treatments with carbohydrases to obtain a high-cellulose content pulp from a non-wood alkaline pulp. Carbohydr Polym 133:302–312. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.016

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinchi L, Cotana F, Fortunati E, Kenny JM (2013) Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: technology and applications. Carbohydr Polym 94:154–169. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.033

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Wang Q, Hirth K et al (2015) Tailoring the yield and characteristics of wood cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) using concentrated acid hydrolysis. Cellulose. doi:10.1007/s10570-015-0615-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong XM, Revol J-F, Gray DG (1998) Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose. Cellulose 5:19–32

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahma F, Iwamoto S, Hori N et al (2010) Isolation, preparation, and characterization of nanofibers from oil palm empty-fruit-bunch (OPEFB). Cellulose 17:977–985. doi:10.1007/s10570-010-9436-4

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan JS, Li YH (2012) Maximizing the yield of nanocrystalline cellulose from cotton pulp fiber. Carbohydr Polym 88:1184–1188. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.081

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filson PB, Dawson-Andoh BE, Schwegler-Berry D (2009) Enzymatic-mediated production of cellulose nanocrystals from recycled pulp. Green Chem 11:1808. doi:10.1039/b915746h

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraschini C, Chauve G, Le Berre J-F et al (2014) Critical discussion of light scattering and microscopy techniques for CNC particle sizing. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29:31–40

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • French AD, Santiago Cintrón M (2013) Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the Segal Crystallinity Index. Cellulose 20:583–588. doi:10.1007/s10570-012-9833-y

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110:3479–3500. doi:10.1021/cr900339w

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbe MA, Rojas OJ, Lucia LA, Sain M (2008) Cellulosic nanocomposites: a review. BioResources 3:929–980

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S et al (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:5438–5466. doi:10.1002/anie.201001273

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin N, Dufresne A (2014) Nanocellulose in biomedicine: current status and future prospect. Eur Polym J 59:302–325. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.025

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu P, Hsieh Y-L (2010) Preparation and properties of cellulose nanocrystals: rods, spheres, and network. Carbohydr Polym 82:329–336. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Sanz M, Vicente AA, Gontard N et al (2015) On the extraction of cellulose nanowhiskers from food by-products and their comparative reinforcing effect on a polyhydroxybutyrate-co-valerate polymer. Cellulose 22:535–551. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0509-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J et al (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994. doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson ML, O’Connor RT (1964) Relation of certain infrared bands to cellulose crystallinity and crystal lattice type. Part II. A new infrared ratio for estimation of crystallinity in celluloses I and II. J Appl Polym Sci 8:1325–1341. doi:10.1002/app.1964.070080323

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neto WPF, Silvério HA, Dantas NO, Pasquini D (2013) Extraction and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from agro-industrial residue - Soy hulls. Ind Crops Prod 42:480–488. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.06.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor RT, DuPré EF, Mitcham D (1958) Applications of infrared absorption spectroscopy to investigations of cotton and modified cottons part I: physical and crystalline modifications and oxidation. Text Res J 28:382–392. doi:10.1177/004051755802800503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintana E, Valls C, Vidal T, Roncero MB (2015a) Comparative evaluation of the action of two different endoglucanases. Part II: on a biobleached acid sulphite pulp. Cellulose 22:2081–2093. doi:10.1007/s10570-015-0631-1

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintana E, Valls C, Vidal T, Roncero MB (2015b) Comparative evaluation of the action of two different endoglucanases. Part I: on a fully bleached, commercial acid sulfite dissolving pulp. Cellulose. doi:10.1007/s10570-015-0623-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman M, Winter WT (2004) Effect of sulfate groups from sulfuric acid hydrolysis on the thermal degradation behavior of bacterial cellulose. Biomacromolecules 5:1671–1677. doi:10.1021/bm034519+

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Široký J, Blackburn RS, Bechtold T et al (2010) Attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy analysis of crystallinity changes in lyocell following continuous treatment with sodium hydroxide. Cellulose 17:103–115. doi:10.1007/s10570-009-9378-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiridon I, Teaca C-A, Bodîrlau R (2010) Structural changes evidenced by FTIR spectroscopy in cellulosic materials after pre-treatment with ionic liquid and enzymatic hydrolysis. BioResources 6:400–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka R, Saito T, Ishii D, Isogai A (2014) Determination of nanocellulose fibril length by shear viscosity measurement. Cellulose 21:1581–1589. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0196-4

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira RSS, da Silva AS, Jang J-H et al (2015) Combining biomass wet disk milling and endoglucanase/β-glucosidase hydrolysis for the production of cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr Polym 128:75–81. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.087

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thielemans W, Warbey CR, Walsh DA (2009) Permselective nanostructured membranes based on cellulose nanowhiskers. Green Chem 11:531–537. doi:10.1039/b818056c

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valls C, Roncero MB (2009) Using both xylanase and laccase enzymes for pulp bleaching. Bioresour Technol 100:2032–2039. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.10.009

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valls C, Colom JF, Baffert C et al (2010) Comparing the efficiency of the laccase–NHA and laccase–HBT systems in eucalyptus pulp bleaching. Biochem Eng J 49:401–407. doi:10.1016/j.bej.2010.02.002

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang QQ, Zhu JY, Reiner RS et al (2012) Approaching zero cellulose loss in cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) production: recovery and characterization of cellulosic solid residues (CSR) and CNC. Cellulose 19:2033–2047. doi:10.1007/s10570-012-9765-6

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanamala N, Farcas M (2014) In vivo evaluation of the pulmonary toxicity of cellulose nanocrystals: a renewable and sustainable nanomaterial of the future. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2:1691–1698

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Spain) for support of this work under the BIOSURFACEL (CTQ2012-34109, funding also from the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, FEDER) and BIOPAPμFLUID (CTQ2013-48995-C2-1-R) projects and an FPI grant (BES-2011-046674). Special thanks are also due to the consolidated research group AGAUR 2014 SGR 534 with Universitat de Barcelona (UB). We are also grateful to Celsur and Fungal Bioproducts for supplying cotton linters and enzyme, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CELBIOTECH_Paper Engineering Research Group, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC. BarcelonaTech), Colom 11, E-08222, Terrassa, Spain

    Facundo Beltramino, M. Blanca Roncero, Antonio L. Torres, Teresa Vidal & Cristina Valls

Authors
  1. Facundo Beltramino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Blanca Roncero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antonio L. Torres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Teresa Vidal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cristina Valls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Blanca Roncero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beltramino, F., Roncero, M.B., Torres, A.L. et al. Optimization of sulfuric acid hydrolysis conditions for preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose from enzymatically pretreated fibers. Cellulose 23, 1777–1789 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0897-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0897-y

Keywords

  • Nanocrystalline cellulose
  • Cellulose nanocrystals
  • Optimization
  • Cellulase
  • Enzymatic treatment
  • Yield increase