Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 1631–1639 | Cite as

Influence of drying method and precipitated salts on pyrolysis for nanocelluloses

  • Kojiro UetaniEmail author
  • Yuta Watanabe
  • Kentaro Abe
  • Hiroyuki Yano
Original Paper

Abstract

The influence of bulk density and drying method on pyrolysis behavior was studied by focusing on the salt content within the nanocellulose (NC) materials. The thermogravimetric curves for NC materials were found to be almost identical between the different bulk densities via the various drying methods. It was therefore concluded that the bulk density and drying method of NC materials had little influence on pyrolysis behavior. By quantitating the remaining salt content within the sulfate-introduced cellulose nanocrystal materials, we discriminated between the sulfate groups bonded onto cellulose and precipitated sulfate from the solvent. The precipitated sulfate was found to accelerate the pyrolysis of NCs in common with the bonded sulfate groups, but in a different rate. These two types of sulfate within the NC materials should have the different catalytic ability on the dehydration of cellulose.

Keywords

Nanocellulose Thermogravimetric analysis Bulk density Drying method Thermal stability Elemental analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Grant 224452) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

Supplementary material

10570_2014_242_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (478 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 477 kb)

References

  1. Abe K, Yano H (2009) Comparison of the characteristics of cellulose microfibril aggregates of wood, rice straw and potato tuber. Cellulose 16:1017–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abe K, Iwamoto S, Yano H (2007) Obtaining cellulose nanofibers with a uniform width of 15 nm from wood. Biomacromolecules 8:3276–3278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abidi N, Hequet E, Cabrales L, Gannaway J, Wilkins T, Wells LW (2008) Evaluating cell wall structure and composition of developing cotton fibers using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis. J App Polym Sci 107:476–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abidi N, Cabrales L, Hequet E (2010) Thermogravimetric analysis of developing cotton fibers. Thermochim Acta 498:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Browning BL (1967) Methods of wood chemistry, vol 2. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp 589–590Google Scholar
  6. Carrillo F, Colom X, Suñol JJ, Saurina J (2004) Structural FTIR analysis and thermal characterization of lyocell and viscose-type fibres. Eur Polym J 40:2229–2234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Czernik S, Bridgwater AV (2004) Overview of applications of biomass fast pyrolysis oil. Energy Fuels 18:590–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deepa B, Abraham E, Cherian M, Bismarck A, Blaker JJ, Pothan L, Leao AL, de Souza SF, Kottaisamy M (2011) Structure, morphology and thermal characteristics of banana nano fibers obtained by steam explosion. Bioresour Technol 102:1988–1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dufresne A (2012) Nanocellulose: from nature to high performance tailored materials. Walter de Gruyter GmbH, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Espinosa SC, Kuhnt T, Johan Foster E, Weder C (2013) Isolation of thermally stable cellulose nanocrystals by phosphoric acid hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules 14:1223–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Okita Y, Isogai A (2010) Thermal stabilization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose. Polym Degrad Stab 95:1502–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jakab E, Mészáros E, Borsa J (2010) Effect of slight chemical modification on the pyrolysis behavior of cellulose fibers. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 87:117–123Google Scholar
  13. Jazaeri E, Tsuzuki T (2013) Effect of pyrolysis conditions on the properties of carbonaceous nanofibers obtained from freeze-dried cellulose nanofibers. Cellulose 20:707–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang F, Hsieh YL (2013) Chemically and mechanically isolated nanocellulose and their self-assembled structures. Carbohydr Polym 95:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jiang F, Han S, Hsieh YL (2013) Controlled defibrillation of rice straw cellulose and self-assembly of cellulose nanofibrils into highly crystalline fibrous materials. RSC Adv 3:12366–12375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kargarzadeh H, Ahmad I, Abdullah I, Dufresne A, Zainudin SY, Sheltami RM (2012) Effects of hydrolysis conditions on the morphology, crystallinity, and thermal stability of cellulose nanocrystals extracted from kenaf bast fibers. Cellulose 19:855–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim DY, Nishiyama Y, Wada M, Kuga S (2001) High-yield carbonization of cellulose by sulfuric acid impregnation. Cellulose 8:29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim UJ, Eom SH, Wada M (2010) Thermal decomposition of native cellulose: influence on crystallite size. Polym Degrad Stab 95:778–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lédé J (2012) Cellulose pyrolysis kinetics: an historical review on the existence and role of intermediate active cellulose. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 94:17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin YC, Cho J, Tompsett GA, Westmoreland PR, Huber GW (2009) Kinetics and mechanism of cellulose pyrolysis. J Phys Chem C 113:20097–20107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loader NJ, Robertson I, Barker AC, Switsur VR, Waterhouse JS (1997) An improved technique for the batch processing of small wholewood samples to α-cellulose. Chem Geol 136:313–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lu P, Hsieh YL (2010) Preparation and properties of cellulose nanocrystals: rods, spheres, and network. Carbohydr Polym 82:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mohan D, Pittman CU Jr, Steele PH (2006) Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energy Fuels 20:848–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Patwardhan PR, Satrio JA, Brown RC, Shanks BH (2010) Influence of inorganic salts on the primary pyrolysis products of cellulose. Bioresour Technol 101:4646–4655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Patwardhan PR, Dalluge DL, Shanks BH, Brown RC (2011) Distinguishing primary and secondary reactions of cellulose pyrolysis. Bioresour Technol 102:5265–5269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peng Y, Gardner DJ, Han Y, Kiziltas A, Cai Z, Tshabalala MA (2013) Influence of drying method on the material properties of nanocellulose I: thermostability and crystallinity. Cellulose 20:2379–2392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roman M, Winter WT (2004) Effect of sulfate groups from sulfuric acid hydrolysis on the thermal degradation behavior of bacterial cellulose. Biomacromolecules 5:1671–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Uetani K, Yano H (2011) Nanofibrillation of wood pulp using a high-speed blender. Biomacromolecules 12:348–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Uetani K, Yano H (2012a) Zeta potential time dependence reveals the swelling dynamics of wood cellulose nanofibrils. Langmuir 28:818–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Uetani K, Yano H (2012b) Semiquantitative structural analysis of highly anisotropic cellulose nanocolloids. ACS Macro Lett 1:651–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Uetani K, Yano H (2013) Self-organizing capacity of nanocelluloses via droplet evaporation. Soft Matter 9:3396–3401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang N, Ding E, Cheng R (2007) Thermal degradation behaviors of spherical cellulose nanocrystals with sulfate groups. Polymer 48:3486–3493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wise LE, Murphy M, D’Addieco AA (1946) Chlorite holocellulose, its fractionation and bearing on summative wood analysis and on studies on the hemicelluloses. Pap Trade J 122:35–43Google Scholar
  34. Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C (2007) Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86:1781–1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kojiro Uetani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yuta Watanabe
    • 1
  • Kentaro Abe
    • 1
  • Hiroyuki Yano
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute for Sustainable HumanosphereKyoto UniversityGokasho, UjiJapan

Personalised recommendations