, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 837–847 | Cite as

The influence of periodate oxidation on the moisture sorptivity and dimensional stability of paper

  • Per A. LarssonEmail author
  • Magnus Gimåker
  • Lars Wågberg


The hygroexpansion of paper was significantly reduced, up to 28% lower amplitude of change when the paper was subjected to a change in relative humidity from 20 to 85% RH, by oxidation of the fibre wall. Never-dried bleached kraft fibres were oxidised with sodium periodate, which specifically oxidises the C2–C3 bond of 1,4-glucans so that the cellulose is partly converted into dialdehyde cellulose. Since both the dry and wet strength of laboratory sheets were significantly improved, the dry tensile strength increased from 24 kNm/kg up to 66 kNm/kg and the relative wet tensile strength increased from 1.5% up to 40%, it is suggested that the aldehydes form hemiacetal linkages within the fibre wall during the consolidation and drying of the sheets. The mechanical, hygroexpansive and moisture sorptive properties of the sheets made from the oxidised fibres were studied. The results showed that the main reason for the reduced hygroexpansion was a decrease in moisture sorptivity, i.e. when the sheets made of fibres with different degrees of cross-linking were subjected to the same change in relative humidity, the more cross-linked fibres showed a smaller change in moisture content. It was also shown that the hygroexpansion coefficient, i.e. the moisture-normalised dimensional change, was not significantly changed by the periodate oxidation, i.e. indicating that there are no improvement in dimensional stability if the paper is subjected to a specific amount of water.


Cross-linking Dimensional stability Hygroexpansion Moisture adsorption Periodate oxidation 



P. Larsson thanks BIM Kemi Sweden AB and the Knowledge Foundation through its graduate school YPK for financial support and M. Gimåker thanks Sustainpack within the 6th European Framework program for financial support. STFI-Packforsk is acknowledged for granting access to their facilities and for their assistance with the equipment.


  1. Andreasson B, Forsström J, Wågberg L (2003) The porous structure of pulp fibres with different yields and its influence on paper strength. Cellulose 10:111–123. doi: 10.1023/A:1024055406619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Back EL (1967) Thermal auto-crosslinking in cellulose material. Pulp Pap Mag Can 68(4):165–171Google Scholar
  3. Byrd VL (1972a) Effect of relative humidity changes during creep on handsheet paper properties. Tappi 55(2):247–252Google Scholar
  4. Byrd VL (1972b) Effect of relative humidity changes on compressive creep response of paper. Tappi 55(11):1612–1613Google Scholar
  5. Cohen WE, Stamm AJ, Fahey DJ (1959) Dimensional stabilization of paper by catalyzed heat-treatment. Tappi 42:904–908Google Scholar
  6. Eriksson M, Torgnysdotter A, Wågberg L (2006) Surface modification of wood fibers using the polyelectrolyte multilayer technique: effects on fiber joint and paper strength properties. Ind Eng Chem Res 45(15):5279–5286. doi: 10.1021/ie060226w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Espy HH (1995) The mechanism of wet-strength development in paper: a review. Tappi J 78:90–99Google Scholar
  8. Ghosh P, Dalal JC (1988) Studies on crosslinking of dialdehyde cellulose and dialdehyde starch using poly(vinyl alcohol). J Polym Mater 5:241–247Google Scholar
  9. Haselton WR (1954) Gas adsorption by wood, pulp, and paper. I. The low-temperature adsorption of nitrogen, butane, and carbon dioxide by sprucewood and its components. Tappi 37:404–412Google Scholar
  10. Hollenbeck RG, Peck GE, Kildsig DO (1978) Application of immersional calorimetry to investigation of solid-liquid interactions: microcrystalline cellulose-water system. J Pharm Sci 67:1599–1606. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600671125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hou QX, Liu W, Liu ZH, Bai LL (2007) Characteristics of wood cellulose fibers treated with periodate and bisulfite. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:7830–7837. doi: 10.1021/ie0704750 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kajanto I, Niskanen K (1998) Dimensional stability. In: Niskanen K (ed) Paper physics. Fapet Oy, pp 222–259Google Scholar
  13. Kim UJ, Kuga S, Wada M, Okano T, Kondo T (2000) Periodate oxidation of crystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 1:488–492. doi: 10.1021/bm0000337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larsson PA, Wågberg L (2008) Influence of fibre–fibre joint properties on dimensional stability of paper. Cellulose 15(4):515–525. doi: 10.1007/s10570-008-9203-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. LeBel RG, Schwartz RW, Sepall O (1968) A novel approach to dimensional stabilization of paper. Tappi 51(2):79A–84AGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindström T, Wågberg L, Larsson T (2005) On the nature of joint strength in paper—A review of dry and wet strength resins used in paper manufacturing. In: Advances in paper science and technology. 13th fundamental research symposium, pp 457–562Google Scholar
  17. Röhrling J, Potthast A, Rosenau T, Lange T, Borgards A, Sixta H et al (2002) A novel method for the determination of carbonyl groups in cellulosics by fluorescence labeling. 2. Validation and applications. Biomacromolecules 3(5):969–975. doi: 10.1021/bm020030p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Salmén L, Fellers C, Htun M (1986) The in-plane and out-of-plane hygroexpansional properties of paper. In: Papermaking Raw Materials. Mech Eng Publishers, London, pp 511–527Google Scholar
  19. Schultz-Eklund O, Fellers C, Johansson PÅ (1992) Method for the local determination of the thickness and density of paper. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 7:133–139, 154Google Scholar
  20. Stamm AJ (1959) Dimensional stabilization of paper by catalyzed heat treatment and cross-linking with formaldehyde. Tappi 42:44–50Google Scholar
  21. Stone JE, Scallan AM (1967) Effect of component removal upon the porous structure of the cellwalls of wood. II. Swelling in water and the fiber saturation point. Tappi 50(10):496–501Google Scholar
  22. Symons MCR (1955) Evidence for formation of free-radical intermediates in some reactions involving periodate. J Chem Soc 2794–2796. doi: 10.1039/jr9550002794
  23. Taylor DL (1968) Mechanism of wet tensile failure. Tappi 51(9):410–413Google Scholar
  24. Uesaka T, Qi D (1994) Hygroexpansivity of paper—effects of fiber-to-fiber bonding. J Pulp Pap Sci 20:175–179Google Scholar
  25. Uesaka T, Kodaka I, Okushima S, Fukuchi R (1989) History-dependent dimensional stability of paper. Rheol Acta 28:238–245. doi: 10.1007/BF01332856 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wågberg L, Hägglund R (2001) Kinetics of polyelectrolyte adsorption on cellulosic fibers. Langmuir 17:1096–1103. doi: 10.1021/la000629f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weatherwax RC, Caulfield DF (1978) The pore structure of papers wet stiffened by formaldehyde crosslinkingI. Results from the water isotherm. J Colloid Interface Sci 67:498–505. doi: 10.1016/0021-9797(78)90240-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zeronian SH, Hudson FL, Peters RH (1964) The mechanical properties of paper made from periodate oxycellulose pulp and from the same pulp after reduction with borohydride. Tappi 47:557–564Google Scholar
  29. Zhao H, Heindel ND (1991) Determination of degree of substitution of formyl groups in polyaldehyde dextran by the hydroxylamine hydrochloride method. Pharm Res 8:400–402. doi: 10.1023/A:1015866104055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Per A. Larsson
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Magnus Gimåker
    • 1
  • Lars Wågberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Fibre and Polymer TechnologyKTH, The Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  2. 2.BIM Kemi Sweden ABStenkullenSweden

Personalised recommendations