Abstract
We investigate how the temporal evolution of the rotation axis of a hypothetical exo-Earth is affected by the presence of a satellite, an exo-Moon. Namely, we study analytically and numerically how the range of the nutation angle of an exo-Earth changes if an exo-Moon is added to a system comprised of an exo-Sun, the exo-Earth and exoplanets. We say that the impact of an exo-Moon is stabilising if upon including the exo-Moon the range of the nutation angle decreases, and destabilising otherwise. The problem is considered in a general set-up. The exo-Earth is supposed to be rigid, axially symmetric and almost spherical, the difference between the largest and the smallest principal moments of inertia being a small parameter of the problem. Assuming the orbits of the celestial bodies to be quasi-periodic, we apply time averaging over fast variables associated with order one frequencies to study rotation of the exo-Earth at times large relative the respective periods. Non-resonant frequencies are assumed. For a system comprised of the exo-Sun and exoplanets in the absence of small orbital frequencies, the system is integrable, which allows to calculate the range of the nutation angle as a function of initial conditions. Using these expressions, we identify a class of systems for which we prove analytically that the impact of the exo-Moon is stabilising and a class where it is destabilising. Namely, if the orbits of the planets are circular and their orbital planes coincide then the impact is destabilising. The impact is stabilising if the angle between orbital planes of the exo-Moon and the exo-Earth vanishes. We also investigate numerically how the impact of the exo-Moon in a particular system comprised of a star and two planets varies on modifying parameters of the orbits of the exo-Moon and the second planet, and the initial nutation angle.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study will be available by request.
Notes
Each frequency involved in the motion of celestial bodies can be assigned to one of two sets as follows. Some of the frequencies (such as the frequency of rotation of the Earth around its axis or the frequencies of the planetary orbital motions) are relatively large, and some (such as the frequency of precession of the Moon’s orbit or the frequencies related to perturbations of the Earths’ motion due to the motion of other planets) are relatively small (secular frequencies). In our asymptotic analysis, upon appropriately rescaling time, we treat frequencies belonging to the first set as order one frequencies.
We assume that in the moonless system the range does not vanish for all initial conditions, because in this case the idea of stabilisation does not make sense. If this happens, \(\Delta ^{P+M}(I_0,h_0)=\Delta ^P(I_0,h_0)D^P/D^{P+M}=0\).
References
Andoyer, H.: Cours de Mécanique Céleste. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1923)
Armstrong, J.C., Barnes, R., Domagal-Goldman, S., Breiner, J., Quinn, T.R., Meadows, V.C.: Effects of extreme obliquity variations on the habitability of exoplanets. Astrobiology 14, 277–291 (2014)
Arnold, V.I., Kozlov, V.V., Neishtadt, A.I.: Mathematical Aspects of Classical and Celestial Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (2006)
Aslanov, V.: Rigid Body Dynamics for Space Applications. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2017)
Balk, M.B.: Elements of Space Flight Dynamics. Nauka, Moscow (1965)
Beletskii, V.V.: Motion of a Satellite Relative to the Center of Mass in a Gravitational Field. MSU Press, Moscow (1975) (in Russian)
Beletskii, V.V.: Resonance rotation of celestial bodies and Cassini’s laws. Celest. Mech. 6, 356–378 (1972)
Beletskii, V.V.: Motion of an Artificial Satellite About Its Center of Mass. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem (1966)
Bouquillon, S., Kinoshita, H., Souchay, J.: Extension of Cassini’s laws. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 86, 29–57 (2003)
Correia, A.C.M.: Stellar and planetary Cassini states. A &A 582, A69 (2015)
Correia, A.C.M., Laskar, J.: Long-term evolution of the spin of Venus: II. Numerical simulations. Icarus 163, 24–45 (2003)
Correia, A.C.M., Laskar, J., Néron de Surgy, O.: Long-term evolution of the spin of Venus: I. Theory. IcarusIcarus Icarus, 1–23 (2003)
Cowan, N.B., Voigt, A., Abbot, D.S.: Thermal phases of Earth-like planets: estimating thermal inertia from eccentricity, obliquity, and diurnal forcing. Astrophys. J. 757, 80 (2012)
Exoplanet catalog: https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/exoplanet-catalog/6987/7-canis-majoris-b/, https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/exoplanet-catalog/7505/7-canis-majoris-c/
Ferreira, D., Marshall, J., O’Gorman, P.A., Seager, S.: Climate at high-obliquity. Icarus 243, 236–248 (2014)
Hamilton, D.P., Ward, W.R.: Tilting Saturn. II. Numerical model. Astron. J. 128, 2510–2517 (2004)
Heller, R., Leconte, J., Barnes, R.: Tidal obliquity evolution of potentially habitable planets. A &A 528, A27 (2011)
Henrard, J., Lemaitre, A.: A second fundamental model for resonance. Celest. Mech. 30, 197–218 (1983)
Kasting, J.F., Catling, D.: Evolution of a habitable planet. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 41, 429–463 (2003)
Kilic, C., Raible, C.C., Stocker, T.F.: Multiple climate states of habitable exoplanets: the role of obliquity and irradiance. Astrophys. J. 844, 147 (2017)
Kinoshita, H.: Theory of the rotation of the rigid Earth. Celest. Mech. 15, 277–326 (1977)
Kipping, D.M., Hartman, J., Buchhave, L.A., et al.: The Hunt for Exomoons with Kepler (HEK). II. Analysis of seven viable satellite-hosting planets. Astrophys. J. 770, 101 (2013)
Kipping, D.M., Forgan, D., Hartman, J., et al.: The Hunt for Exomoons with Kepler (HEK). III. The first search for an exomoon around a habitable-zone planet. Astrophys. J. 777, 134 (2013)
Krasilnikov, P.S., Podvigina, O.M.: On evolution of the planet’s obliquity in a non-resonant planetary system. Bull. Udmurt Univ. Math. Mech. Comput. Sci. 28, 549–564 (2018) (in Russian)
Krasil’nikov, P.S., Zaharova, E.E.: Nonresonant rotations of a satellite about its center of mass in the restricted N-body problem. Cosm. Res. 31, 11–21 (1993)
Krasilnikov, P.S.: Applied Methods of Investigation of Non-linear Oscillations. IKI (2015) (in Russian)
Krasilnikov, P.S.: Spatial rotations of a satellite in a circular three-body problem for the case of general resonance. Cosm. Res. 28, 808–819 (1990)
Krasilnikov, P.S., Amelin, R.N.: On the precession of Saturn. Cosm. Res. 56, 306–316 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952518040019
Laskar, J., Joutel, F., Robutel, P.: Stabilization of the Earth’s obliquity by the Moon. Nature 361, 615–617 (1993)
Laskar, J., Robutel, P.: The chaotic obliquity of the planets. Nature 361, 608–612 (1993)
Laskar, J., Joutel, F., Boudin, F.: Orbital, precessional and insolation quantities for the Earth from -20Myr to +10Myr. A &A 270, 522–533 (1993)
Laskar, J., Correia, A.M.C., Gastineau, M., Joutel, F., Levrard, B., Robutel, P.: Long term evolution and chaotic diffusion of the insolation quantities of Mars. Icarus 170, 343–364 (2004)
Lhotka, C.: Steady state obliquity of a rigid body in the spin-orbit resonant problem: application to Mercury. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 128, 397–414 (2017)
Li, G., Batygin, K.: On the spin-axis dynamics of a Moonless Earth. Astrophys. J. 790(7pp), 69 (2014)
Lissauer, J.J., Barnes, J.W., Chambers, J.E.: Obliquity variations of a moonless Earth. Icarus 217, 77–87 (2011)
Markeev, A.P., Krasilnikov, P.S.: On the motion of a satellite relative to the center of mass in the elliptic restricted three body problem. Cosm. Res. 19, 178–190 (1981)
Milankovitch, M.: Canon of Insolation and the Ice-Age Problem. Serbian Academy, Belgrade (1941) (in German)
Millholland, S., Batygin, K.: Excitation of planetary obliquities through planet–disk interactions. Astron. J. 816(10pp), 119 (2019)
Millholland, S., Laughlin, G.: Obliquity-driven sculpting of exoplanetary systems. Nat. Astron. 3, 424–433 (2019)
Molchanov, A.M.: The resonant structure of the solar system: the law of planetary distances. Icarus 8, 203–215 (1968)
Murray, C.D., Dermott, S.F.: Solar System Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Néron de Surgy, O., Laskar, J.: On the long term evolution of the spin of the Earth. A &A 318, 975 (1997)
Peale, S.J.: Generalized Cassini laws. Astron. J. 74, 483–489 (1969)
Podvigina, O.M., Krasilnikov, P.S.: Evolution of obliquity of an exoplanet: a non-resonant case. Icarus 335, 113371 (2020)
Quarles, B., Barnes, J.W., Lissauer, J.J., Chambers, J.: Obliquity evolution of the potentially habitable exoplanet Kepler-62F. Astrobiology 20, 73–90 (2020)
Quillen, A.C., Chen, Y.-Y., Noyelles, B., Loane, S.: Tilting Styx and Nix but not Uranus with a spin-precession-mean-motion resonance. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 130, 1–27 (2018)
Saillenfest, M., Laskar, J., Boué, G.: Secular spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets. A &A 623(21 pp.), A4 (2019)
Sanders, J.A., Verhust, F.: Averaging Methods in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems. Springer, New York (1985)
Shan, Y., Li, G.: Obliquity variations of habitable zone planets Kepler-62f and Kepler-186f. Astron. J. 155(15pp), 237 (2018)
Smart, W.M.: Celestial Mechanics. Longmans, Green and Company, London (1953)
Spiegel, D.S., Menou, K., Scharf, C.A.: Habitable climates: the influence of obliquity. Astrophys. J. 691, 596–610 (2009)
Tisserand, F.: Traité de mécanique céleste, t. II. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1889) (in French)
Volosov, V.M.: Russian Math. Surveys 17(1–126) (1962a)
Volosov, V.M.: Averaging in systems of ordinary differential equations. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 17, 3–126 (1962b)
Ward, W.R.: Tidal friction and generalized Cassini’s laws in the solar system. Astron. J. 80, 64–70 (1975)
Ward, W.R., Hamilton, D.P.: Tilting Saturn. I. Analytical model. Astron. J. 128, 2501 (2004)
Zheligovsky, V.A.: Large-Scale Perturbations of Magnetohydrodynamic Regimes: Linear and Weakly Nonlinear Stability Theory. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 829. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Acknowledgements
Our research was carried out in the Moscow Aviation Institute and Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics, RAS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Calculation of \(\Delta \) in a planetary system, comprised of the exo-Sun, exo-Earth and exoplanets
Here we give a detailed derivation of approximations (28) for the range of the nutation angle from the Eqs. (18), (26), (27) for the temporal evolution of the angles I and h.
Steady states of system (18) satisfy \(\,\mathrm{d}\,I/\,\mathrm{d}\,t=\,\mathrm{d}\,h/\,\mathrm{d}\,t=0\). Therefore, due to (26) they can be found from the equations
Since the mass of the exo-Sun is much larger than the masses of planets, due to (15), (16) and (27) we have that \(D\gg \max (|\alpha |,|\beta |)\). Therefore, the first equation in (37) implies \(\sin 2I\approx 0\). Hence, the steady states are
where \((I\approx \pi /2,h'\approx 0)\) and \((I\approx \pi /2,h'\approx \pi )\) are saddles and the other ones are centres. The saddles are connected by heteroclinic trajectories that divide the celestial sphere into four regions, each comprised of a centre and closed trajectories around it, see Fig. 2a.
Since \(\,\mathrm{d}\,I/\,\mathrm{d}\,h'=\,\mathrm{d}\,I/\,\mathrm{d}\,t(\,\mathrm{d}\,h'/\,\mathrm{d}\,t)^{-1}\), the extrema of \(I(h')\) take place at
Below we evaluate \(\Delta (I_0,h_0)\) defined by (1), where \(h_0=\pi /2\) (shown by grey line in Fig. 2a) and consider \(0\le I_0\le \pi /2\). Since D is large compared with \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \), the nutation angle \(I(h')\) is close to \(I_0\) and we can write \(I(h')=I_0+I_1(h')\). Therefore,
Since \({\tilde{{{\mathcal {G}}}}}(I,h')\) is a constant on trajectories, substituting the above expressions into (26) we obtain a quadratic equation on \(I_1(h')\)
The range \(\Delta \) is a continuous function of \(I_0\) and \(h_0\) inside a region and is discontinuous at a boundary. For a heteroclinic trajectory through \((\pi /2,0)\), we have
hence trajectories with the initial conditions \((I_0,\pi /2)\) such that
belong to the equatorial regions, while the other ones to the polar regions. Since \(D\gg \max (\alpha ,\beta )\), the inequality (40) may be simplified to
i.e. the trajectories through \((I_0,\pi /2)\) belong to an equatorial region if \(\pi /2-\delta _{het}<I_0<\pi /2+\delta _{het}\), where \(\delta _{het}=(2\alpha /D)^{1/2}\), and to a polar one otherwise.
To solve Eq. (39) we consider three possibilities for \(I_0\) if the initial condition \((I_0,h_0)\) belongs to the polar region:
-
(i)
\(D^{1/2}|\sin I_0|<\beta ^{1/2}\), \(|\sin I_0|<|\cos I_0|\);
-
(ii)
\(D^{1/2}\sin ^2I_0>\max (\alpha ,\beta ^{1/2}|\sin I_0|)\);
-
(iii)
\(D^{1/2}\sin ^2I_0<\alpha ^{1/2}\), \(|\sin I_0|>|\cos I_0|\), \(|I_0-{\pi \over 2}|>(2\alpha )^{1/2}D^{-1/2}\).
and the equatorial region:
-
(iv)
\(|I_0-{\pi \over 2}|<(2\alpha )^{1/2}D^{-1/2}\).
Since \(D\gg \beta \), in case (i) we have that \(I_0\) is close to 0 or \(\pi \). Therefore, from (38) the extrema of \(I(h')\) take place at \(\sin (h'+\gamma )\approx 0\). Substituting \(h'+\gamma =0\) and \(\pi \) into (39), solving the quadratic equation and subtracting the root at \(h'+\gamma =0\) from the one at \(h'+\gamma =\pi \) we find that
In case (ii) in Eq. (39), the quadratic term can be neglected and the remaining linear equation can be easily solved for any value of \(h'\). We cannot derive from (38) the particular value of \(h'\) where the maxima and minima take place; hence, we give upper and lower bound for \(\Delta \) (they differ less than a factor 2):
Alternatively, we introduce the function
where
Then
As we noted \(D\gg \alpha \), therefore in case (iii) we have that \(I_0\approx \pi /2\). Hence (see (38)), the minima of \(I(h')\) take place at \(h'=0\) and \(\pi \) and the maxima at \(h'=\pi /2\) and \(3\pi /2\). Solving (39) we obtain that
In case (iv) a trajectory twice intersects the meridian \(h'=\pi /2\), at the intersection points I takes the maximum and minimum values, \(I_{\max }\) and \(I_{\min }\), for this particular trajectory (see (38)). Moreover, (39) implies that \(I_{\max }-\pi /2\approx \pi /2-I_{\min }\). Hence,
Overall, for \(0\le I_0\le \pi /2\) we have
Remark 2
We have calculated \(\Delta (I_0,h_0)\) for \(h_0=\pi /2\) only. Unless \(I_0\) is close to \(\pi /2\), the dependence of \(\Delta \) on \(h_0\) is marginal, as illustrated by Fig. 2a. By contrast, near \(I_0=\pi /2\) the range essentially depends on \(h_0\). For example, for an initial condition corresponding to a saddle steady state the range vanishes, while for a slightly perturbed initial condition one can get \(\Delta \)’s close to \(2\delta _{het}\) (inside the equatorial region) or \(\delta _{het}\) (inside the polar region), see in Fig. 2a. Investigation of the dependence of \(\Delta (I_0,h_0)\) on \(h_0\) for \(I_0\) near \(\pi /2\), which can be carried out similarly, is left for future studies.
The canonical change of variables employed in Sect. 4.3
Let the functions \(D_j(t)\) in the averaged Eqs. (18), (19) be represented as the sums
where \(D_j^{(1)}\) (21) result from the torque from the Sun, \(D^{(2)}_j\) (24) from the Moon and \(D_j^{(3)},\ldots ,D_j^{(n)}\) from the planets. As discussed in Sect. 2, the terms \(D_j^*\) are time-independent.
The mean Hamiltonian takes the form
Substitution of (24) and (29) into (50) followed by a series of algebraic transformations yield
Using the generating function \(F_2(h,H')=H'(h-\Omega _0-\sigma _\mathrm{n}t)\), we obtain that in the canonical coordinates \((H',h')=(H,h-\Omega _0-\sigma _\mathrm{n}t)\) the Hamiltonian (51) takes the form
Therefore, (10), (11) imply that
where
and \(\rho =3\varepsilon (C_1-A_1)/2G\). In the new variables \((H,h')\), we have that \({{\mathcal {G}}}'=const\) along the trajectories. Note that the Eq. (53) is invariant under the symmetry \(h'\rightarrow -h'\)
The equation is also invariant after the transformation\((\sigma _\mathrm{n},I,h')\rightarrow (-\sigma _\mathrm{n},\pi -I,h'+\pi )\), therefore without the loss of generality we consider non-negative \(\sigma _\mathrm{n}\)’s only.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Podvigina, O.M., Krasilnikov, P.S. Impact of a moon on the evolution of a planet’s rotation axis: a non-resonant case. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 134, 21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-022-10077-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-022-10077-5