Abstract
We investigate the stable Cassini state 1 in the p : q spin–orbit resonant problem. Our study includes the effect of the gravitational potential up to degree and order 4 and p : q spin–orbit resonances with \(p,q\le 8\) and \(p\ge q\). We derive new formulae that link the gravitational field coefficients with its secular orbital elements and its rotational parameters. The formulae can be used to predict the orientation of the spin axis and necessary angular momentum at exact resonance. We also develop a simple pendulum model to approximate the dynamics close to resonance and make use of it to predict the libration periods and widths of the oscillatory regime of motions in phase space. Our analytical results are based on averaging theory that we also confirm by means of numerical simulations of the exact dynamical equations. Our results are applied to a possible rotational history of Mercury.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baland, R.M., Yseboodt, M., Rivoldini, A., Van Hoolst, T.: Obliquity of Mercury: influence of the precession of the pericenter and of tides. Icarus 291, 136–159 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.03.020. arXiv:1612.06564
Cassini, G.D.: Traité de L’origine e de Progrés de L’Astronomie. Observatoire de Paris, Paris (1693)
Celletti, A.: Analysis of resonances in the spin-orbit problem in celestial mechanics: higher order resonances and some numerical experiments (part II). Z. Angew. Math. Phys. ZAMP 41(4), 453–479 (1990). doi:10.1007/BF00945951
Celletti, A., Chierchia, L.: Measures of basins of attraction in spin-orbit dynamics. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 101, 159–170 (2008). doi:10.1007/s10569-008-9142-9
Celletti, A., Lhotka, C.: Transient times, resonances and drifts of attractors in dissipative rotational dynamics. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 19, 3399–3411 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.01.013. arXiv:1401.4378
Correia, A.C.M.: Stellar and planetary Cassini states. Astron. Astrophys. 582, A69 (2015). doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525939
Correia, A.C.M., Laskar, J.: Mercury’s capture into the 3/2 spin-orbit resonance as a result of its chaotic dynamics. Nature 429, 848–850 (2004). doi:10.1038/nature02609
Correia, A.C.M., Laskar, J.: Mercury’s capture into the 3/2 spin-orbit resonance including the effect of core-mantle friction. Icarus 201, 1–11 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.12.034. arXiv:0901.1843
D’Hoedt, S., Lemaître, A.: Planetary long periodic terms in Mercury’s rotation: a two dimensional adiabatic approach. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 101, 127–139 (2008). doi:10.1007/s10569-007-9115-4
Dvorak, R., Lhotka, C.: Celestial Dynamics: Chaoticity and Dynamics of Celestial Systems. Wiley. https://books.google.at/books?id=CWOoAAAAQBAJ (2013)
Gkolias, I., Celletti, A., Efthymiopoulos, C., Pucacco, G.: The theory of secondary resonances in the spin-orbit problem. MNRAS 459, 1327–1339 (2016). doi:10.1093/mnras/stw752. arXiv:1603.07760
Henrard, J., Lemaitre, A.: The untangling transformation. Astron. J. 130(5), 2415 (2005)
Knibbe, J.S., van Westrenen, W.: On Mercury’s past rotation, in light of its large craters. Icarus 281, 1–18 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2016.08.036
Laskar, J., Robutel, P.: The chaotic obliquity of the planets. Nature 361, 608–612 (1993)
Lhotka, C.: A symplectic mapping for the synchronous spin-orbit problem. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 115, 405–426 (2013). doi:10.1007/s10569-012-9464-5
Margot, J.L., Peale, S.J., Jurgens, R.F., Slade, M.A., Holin, I.V.: Large longitude libration of Mercury reveals a molten core. Science 316, 710 (2007). doi:10.1126/science.1140514
Matsuyama, I., Nimmo, F.: Gravity and tectonic patterns of Mercury: effect of tidal deformation, spin-orbit resonance, nonzero eccentricity, despinning, and reorientation. J. Geophys. Res. (Planets) 114(E01), 010 (2009)
Mazarico, E., Genova, A., Goossens, S., Lemoine, F.G., Neumann, G.A., Zuber, M.T., et al.: The gravity field, orientation, and ephemeris of Mercury from MESSENGER observations after three years in orbit. J. Geophys. Res. (Planets) 119, 2417–2436 (2014). doi:10.1002/2014JE004675
Noyelles, B., Lhotka, C.: The influence of orbital dynamics, shape and tides on the obliquity of Mercury. Adv. Space Res. 52, 2085–2101 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.asr.2013.09.024. arXiv:1211.7027
Noyelles, B., Frouard, J., Makarov, V.V., Efroimsky, M.: Spin-orbit evolution of Mercury revisited. Icarus 241, 26–44 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.05.045. arXiv:1307.0136
Peale, S.J.: Does Mercury have a molten core. Nature 262, 765 (1976). doi:10.1038/262765a0
Peale, S.J., Boss, A.P.: A spin-orbit constraint on the viscosity of a mercurian liquid core. J. Geophys. Res. 82(5), 743–749 (1977)
Peale, S.J., Margot, J.L., Hauck, S.A., Solomon, S.C.: Effect of core-mantle and tidal torques on Mercury’s spin axis orientation. Icarus 231, 206–220 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.12.007. arXiv:1401.4131
Peale, S.J., Margot, J.L., Hauck, S.A., Solomon, S.C.: Consequences of a solid inner core on Mercury’s spin configuration. Icarus 264, 443–455 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2015.09.024
Pettengill, G.H., Dyce, R.B.: A radar determination of the rotation of the planet Mercury. Nature 206, 1240 (1965)
Sansottera, M., Lhotka, C., Lemaître, A.: Effective stability around the Cassini state in the spin-orbit problem. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 119, 75–89 (2014). doi:10.1007/s10569-014-9547-6. arXiv:1510.06521
Sansottera, M., Lhotka, C., Lemaître, A.: Effective resonant stability of Mercury. MNRAS 452, 4145–4152 (2015). doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1429. arXiv:1510.06543
Scheeres, D.J.: Orbital Motion in Strongly Perturbed Environments. Springer, New York (2012)
Smith, D.E., Zuber, M.T., Phillips, R.J., Solomon, S.C., Hauck, S.A., Lemoine, F.G., et al.: Gravity field and internal structure of Mercury from MESSENGER. Science 336, 214 (2012). doi:10.1126/science.1218809
Stark, A., Oberst, J., Hussmann, H.: Mercury’s resonant rotation from secular orbital elements. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 123, 263–277 (2015). doi:10.1007/s10569-015-9633-4. arXiv:1506.00008
Van Hoolst, T., Jacobs, C.: Mercury’s tides and interior structure. J. Geophys. Res. (Planets) 108, 5121 (2003). doi:10.1029/2003JE002126
Van Hoolst, T., Sohl, F., Holin, I., Verhoeven, O., Dehant, V., Spohn, T.: Mercury’s interior structure, rotation, and tides. Space Sci. Rev. 132, 203–227 (2007). doi:10.1007/s11214-007-9202-6
Wieczorek, M.A., Correia, A.C.M., Le Feuvre, M., Laskar, J., Rambaux, N.: Mercury’s spin-orbit resonance explained by initial retrograde and subsequent synchronous rotation. Nat. Geosci. 5, 18–21 (2012). doi:10.1038/ngeo1350. arXiv:1112.2384
Yseboodt, M., Rivoldini, A., Van Hoolst, T., Dumberry, M.: Influence of an inner core on the long-period forced librations of Mercury. Icarus 226, 41–51 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.05.011. arXiv:1305.4764
Acknowledgements
I thank the Namur Center for Complex Systems (NAXYS) for fruitful discussions during my research stay in Namur, i.e., A. Lemaître and B. Noyelles who introduced me into the scientific subject. I also thank the reviewers for their suggestions that greatly improved the readability of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
A Expressions
The expressions for A[k], \(s_{k,j}\) defined in (17), (18) are summarized in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. Only terms that have been used in this study are shown. Expressions not appearing in the respective tables are assumed to be zero. The complete list of terms can be found in the electronic supplement material to be accessed on https://l-sgn.org/cmda-2017/.
B Rotation matrices
The rotation matrices, used in the present paper, are defined following the convention:
where \(R_j=R_j(\psi )\) with \(j=1,2,3\) and where we used the abbreviations \(c=\cos (\psi )\) and \(s=\sin (\psi )\).
C Table of notations
See Table 5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lhotka, C. Steady state obliquity of a rigid body in the spin–orbit resonant problem: application to Mercury. Celest Mech Dyn Astr 129, 397–414 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-017-9787-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-017-9787-3