Skip to main content
Log in

Steady state obliquity of a rigid body in the spin–orbit resonant problem: application to Mercury

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the stable Cassini state 1 in the p : q spin–orbit resonant problem. Our study includes the effect of the gravitational potential up to degree and order 4 and p : q spin–orbit resonances with \(p,q\le 8\) and \(p\ge q\). We derive new formulae that link the gravitational field coefficients with its secular orbital elements and its rotational parameters. The formulae can be used to predict the orientation of the spin axis and necessary angular momentum at exact resonance. We also develop a simple pendulum model to approximate the dynamics close to resonance and make use of it to predict the libration periods and widths of the oscillatory regime of motions in phase space. Our analytical results are based on averaging theory that we also confirm by means of numerical simulations of the exact dynamical equations. Our results are applied to a possible rotational history of Mercury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank the Namur Center for Complex Systems (NAXYS) for fruitful discussions during my research stay in Namur, i.e., A. Lemaître and B. Noyelles who introduced me into the scientific subject. I also thank the reviewers for their suggestions that greatly improved the readability of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Lhotka.

Appendices

A Expressions

The expressions for A[k], \(s_{k,j}\) defined in (17), (18) are summarized in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. Only terms that have been used in this study are shown. Expressions not appearing in the respective tables are assumed to be zero. The complete list of terms can be found in the electronic supplement material to be accessed on https://l-sgn.org/cmda-2017/.

Table 3 Expressions in (17), (18) for the 3 : 2 and 1 : 1 spin–orbit resonances
Table 4 Expressions in (17), (18) for the 3 : 1, 5 : 2, 2 : 1 spin–orbit resonances

B Rotation matrices

The rotation matrices, used in the present paper, are defined following the convention:

$$\begin{aligned} R_1=\left( \begin{array}{lll} 1 &{}\quad 0 &{}\quad 0 \\ 0 &{}\quad c &{}\quad -s \\ 0 &{}\quad s &{}\quad c \\ \end{array} \right) \ , \ R_2=\left( \begin{array}{lll} c &{}\quad 0 &{}\quad s \\ 0 &{}\quad 1 &{}\quad 0 \\ -s &{}\quad 0 &{}\quad c \\ \end{array} \right) \ , \ R_3=\left( \begin{array}{lll} c &{}\quad -s &{}\quad 0 \\ s &{}\quad c &{}\quad 0 \\ 0 &{}\quad 0 &{}\quad 1 \\ \end{array} \right) \ , \end{aligned}$$

where \(R_j=R_j(\psi )\) with \(j=1,2,3\) and where we used the abbreviations \(c=\cos (\psi )\) and \(s=\sin (\psi )\).

C Table of notations

See Table 5.

Table 5 Table of notations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lhotka, C. Steady state obliquity of a rigid body in the spin–orbit resonant problem: application to Mercury. Celest Mech Dyn Astr 129, 397–414 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-017-9787-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-017-9787-3

Keywords

Navigation