Abstract
The extension of Öpik’s theory of close encounters developed in the last decades allows a fully analytical, quantitative treatment of the motion of a small body encountering a massive perturber on a circular orbit. In this paper we derive explicit expressions for the initial values of the angular elements of the small body orbit, of given semimajor axis, eccentricity and inclination, in order to obtain a post-encounter orbit with prescribed values of semimajor axis, eccentricity and inclination. We describe the geometrical aspects of the algorithm, and give two examples of application; the first of them concerns the geometry of the 2029 Earth encounter of Apophis, while the second illustrates a sequence of close encounters with Callisto of the JUICE probe, aimed at changing the inclination of the spacecraft orbit. In the planning of complex space missions involving multiple encounters with planets or satellites, the algorithm described in the paper could provide a reliable initial guess to start the computationally intensive optimization process.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
JUICE (JUpiter ICy moons Explorer) is an ESA mission, planned for launch in 2022 and arrival at Jupiter in 2030, that will spend at least three years making observations of the giant planet and of three of its largest moons, Ganymede, Callisto and Europa.
References
Carusi, A., Valsecchi, G.B., Greenberg, R.: Planetary close encounters: geometry of approach and postencounter orbital parameters. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 49, 111 (1990)
Farnocchia, D., Chesley, S.R., Chodas, P.W., Micheli, M., Tholen, D.J., Milani, A., et al.: Yarkovsky-driven impact risk analysis for asteroid (99942) Apophis. Icarus 224, 192 (2013)
Greenberg, R., Carusi, A., Valsecchi, G.B.: Outcome of planetary close encounters: a systematic comparison of methodologies. Icarus 75, 1 (1988)
JUICE Science Working Team, 2014, JUICE—JUpiter ICy moons Explorer—exploring the emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants, ESA/SRE (2014) 1
Kawakatsu, Y.: In: Proceedings of 21st International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics (2009)
Kizner, W.: A method of describing miss distances for lunar and interplanetary trajectories. Planet. Space Sci. 7, 125 (1961)
Öpik, E.J.: Interplanetary Encounters. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1976)
Strange N., Russell R., Buffington B.: AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, AAS Paper 07-277 (2007)
Valsecchi, G.B.: Geometric conditions for quasi-collisions in Öpik’s theory. Lect. Notes Phys. 682, 145 (2006)
Valsecchi, G.B., Milani, A., Gronchi, G.F., Chesley, S.R.: The distribution of energy perturbations at planetary close encounters. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 78, 83 (2000)
Valsecchi, G.B., Milani, A., Gronchi, G.F., Chesley, S.R.: Resonant returns to close approaches: analytical theory. A&A 408, 1179 (2003)
Valsecchi, G.B., Alessi, E.M., Rossi, A.: The geometry of impacts on a synchronous planetary satellite. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 119, 257 (2014)
Wenzel, K.-P., Marsden, R.G., Page, D.E., Smith, E.J.: The Ulysses mission. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 92, 207 (1992)
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the editor and two anonymous referees for their comments that helped to improve the paper. Part of this research was performed in the framework of the FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN: Stardust—The Asteroid and Space Debris Network.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Notation
As noted in Valsecchi et al. (2003), the b-plane coordinate \(\xi \) represents essentially the local minimum of the distance between the orbits of the secondary and of the small body, which results in \(\xi =0\) if the two orbits cross. The theory holds also when they almost cross. On the other hand, \(\zeta \) is related to the timing of the encounter, i.e. to how early, or how late, is the small body with respect to the secondary.
\(a, e, i, \varOmega , \omega , f\) | Pre-encounter orbital elements of the small body about the primary |
\(a', e', i', \varOmega ', \omega ', f'\) | Post-encounter orbital elements of the small body about the primary |
X-Y-Z | Reference frame centred on the secondary at the encounter |
\(\mathbf{U}\) | Pre-encounter relative velocity vector in the X-Y-Z reference frame |
\(U_x, U_y, U_z\) | Components of \(\mathbf{U}\) |
\(\theta , \phi \) | Angles defining the direction of \(\mathbf{U}\) in the X-Y-Z reference frame |
\(\mathbf { U}\varvec{'}\) | Post-encounter relative velocity vector in the X-Y-Z reference frame |
\(U'_x, U'_y, U'_z\) | Components of \(\mathbf { U}\varvec{'}\) |
\(\theta ', \phi '\) | Angles defining the direction of \(\mathbf { U}\varvec{'}\) in X-Y-Z |
\(\xi , \zeta \) | b-plane coordinates |
\(\xi ', \zeta '\) | Coordinates on the post-encounter b-plane (normal to \(\mathbf { U}\varvec{'}\)) |
r | Distance from the primary |
\(\lambda , \beta \) | Longitude and latitude of the small body |
\(a_p\) | Radius of the circular orbit of the secondary about the primary |
\(\lambda _p\) | Longitude of the secondary |
d | Distance between the small body and the secondary |
\(t_b\) | Time of b-plane crossing |
c | Modulus of the semimajor axis of the hyperbola about the secondary |
m | Mass of the secondary in units of that of the primary |
b | Impact parameter |
q, Q | Pericentre, apocentre |
Appendix 2: Range of validity of the algorithms
The quantitative description of close encounter dynamics made by the theory presented in the paper can be reasonably accurate if a certain number of conditions are verified; we list them hereafter.
1.1 The encounter must be hyperbolic
The orbit of the small body about the secondary at encounter must be hyperbolic, otherwise \(\mathbf{U}\) is undefined, implying that \(U^2>0\); this, in turn, implies that
1.2 The secondary and the small body must not be co-moving
Even for a hyperbolic encounter it can happen, if the pre-encounter orbit of the small body is characterized by a very small i, and either \(q\approx {a}_p\) or \(Q\approx {a}_p\), that \(\sin \theta \) is very small; if this happens, \(\phi \) becomes ill-determined, since \(\sin \theta \) appears in the denominators of (1) and (2), and the quantitative results are likewise degraded.
1.3 The encounter must be close
As discussed in Section 3 and Appendix A.1 of Valsecchi et al. (2003), the formulae to pass from orbital elements to encounter-related variables are linearized in b, so cannot reliably used for very shallow encounters.
1.4 The mass of the secondary must be small
The encounter velocity U is in units of the velocity of the secondary about the primary, provided that the velocity of the secondary is computed as if its mass were 0; this introduces a small error, of order m. As a consequence, the encounter-related variables are linearized not only in b, as seen above, but also in m; therefore the theory cannot reliably used for encounters with very massive secondary bodies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valsecchi, G.B., Alessi, E.M. & Rossi, A. An analytical solution for the swing-by problem. Celest Mech Dyn Astr 123, 151–166 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-015-9631-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-015-9631-6