Abstract
The Unified State Model is a method for expressing orbits using a set of seven elements. The elements consist of a quaternion and three parameters based on the velocity hodograph. A complete derivation of the original model is given in addition to two proposed modifications. Both modifications reduce the number of state elements from seven to six by replacing the quaternion with either modified Rodrigues parameters or the Exponential Map. Numerical simulations comparing the original Unified State Model, the Unified State Model with modified Rodrigues parameters, and the Unified State Model with Exponential Map, with the traditional Cartesian coordinates have been carried out. The Unified State Model and its derivatives outperform the Cartesian coordinates for all orbit cases in terms of accuracy and computational speed, except for highly eccentric perturbed orbits. The performance of the Unified State Model is exceptionally better for the case of orbits with continuous low-thrust propulsion with CPU simulation time being an order of magnitude lower than for the simulation using Cartesian coordinates. This makes the Unified State Model an excellent state propagator for mission optimizations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Altman, S.P.: Orbital Hodograph Analysis. AAS science and technology series 3, North Hollywood Western Periodicals (1965)
Altman, S.P.: Acceleration hodograph analysis techniques for powered orbital trajectories. Nasa-cr-61616, NASA (1967a)
Altman, S.P.: Hodographic treatment of the restricted three body problem. Tech. Rep. NASA-CR-61615, NASA (1967b)
Altman S.P.: A unified state model of orbital trajectory and attitude dynamics. Celest. Mech. 6, 425–446 (1972)
Altman S.P.: Velocity-space maps and transforms of tracking observations for orbital trajectory state analysis. Celest. Mech. 11, 405–428 (1975)
Apostolatos T.A.: Hodograph: a useful geometrical tool for solving some difficult problems in dynamics. Am. J. Phys. 71(3), 261–266 (2003)
Batting, R.H.: An Introduction to the Mathematics and Methods of Astrodynamics, Revised Edition. AIAA Education Series, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. (1999)
Bond V.R.: The uniform, regular differential equations of the KS transformed perturbed two-body problem. Celest. Mech. 10, 303–318 (1974)
Bond V.R., Allman M.C.: Modern Astrodynamics: Fundamentals and Perturbation Methods. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1996)
Bond, V.R., Fraietta, M.F.: Elimination of secular terms from the differential equations for the elements of the perturbed two-body problem. In: Proceedings of the Flight Mechanics and Estimation Theory Symposium-1991, Greenbelt, Maryland. NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center (1991)
Bond, V.R., Hanssen, V.: The Burdet formulation of the perturbed two-body problem with total energy as an element. Tech. Rep. JSC Internal 73-FM-86 (JSC-08004), NASA/Johnson Space Center (JSC) (1973)
Breiter S.: Explicit symplectic integrator for highly eccentric orbits. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 71(4), 229–241 (1998)
Cash J.R., Karp A.H.: A variable order Runge-Kutta method for initial value problems with rapidly varying right-hand sides. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 16(3), 201–222 (1990)
Chodas, P.: Application of the extended Kalman filter to several formulations of orbit determination. UTIAS Technical Note 224, University of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies (1981)
Crassidis J.L., Markley F.L.: Sliding mode control using modified rodrigues parameters. J. Guidance Control Dyn. 19(6), 1381–1383 (1996)
Dallas, S., Rinderle, E.A.: A comparison os Cowell’s method and a variation-of-parameters method for the computation of precision satellite orbits. Technical Report 32-1526, JPL (2000)
Eades, J.B.: Orbit information derived from its hodograph. Tech. Rep. TM X-63301, NASA (1968)
Fukushima, T.: New two-body regularization. Astron. J. 133(1), 1–10 (2007a)
Fukushima T.: Numerical comparison of two-body regularizations. Astron. J. 133(6), 2815–2824 (2007b)
Grassia F.S.: Practical parameterization of rotations using the exponential map. J. Graph. Tools 3, 29–48 (1998)
Hintz G.R.: Survey of orbit element sets. J. Guidance Control Dyn. 31(3), 785–790 (2008)
Hughes P.C.: Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics. Wiley, New York (1986)
Jezewski D.J.: A comparative study of Newtonian Kustaanheimo/Stiefel, and Sperling/Burdet optimal trajectories. Celest. Mech. 12(3), 297–315 (1975)
Jizheng C., Jianping Y., Qun F.: Flight vehicle attitude determination using the modified rodrigues parameters. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 21(5), 433–440 (2008)
Kurcheeva I.V.: Kustaanheimo–Stiefel regularization and nonclassical canonical transformations. Celest. Mech. 15, 353–365 (1977)
Mayer-Gürr, T., Kurtenbach, E., Eicker, A.: ITG-Grace2010, http://www.igg.uni-bonn.de/apmg/index.php?id=itg-grace2010. Last accessed 15 April 2010 (2010)
Montenbruck O., Gill E.: Satellite Orbits: Models, Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2005)
Pelaez J., Hedo J.M., de Andres P.R.: A special perturbation method in orbital dynamics. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 97(2), 131–150 (2007)
Petit J.M.: Symplectic integrators: rotations and roundoff errors. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 70, 1–21 (1998)
Petropoulos A.E., Longuski J.M.: Shape-based algorithm for automated design of low-thrust, gravity-assist trajectories. J. Spacecraft Rockets 41(5), 787–790 (2004)
Raol, J.R., Sinha, N.K.: On the orbit determination problem. In: IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, IEEE, vol AES-21, pp. 274–291 (1985)
Schaub, H., Junkins, J.L.: Analytical Mechanics of Aerospace Systems. AIAA Education Series, AIAA (2002)
Silver M.: A short derivation of the Sperling–Burdet equations. Celest. Mech. 11, 39–41 (1975)
Stiefel E.L., Scheifele G.: Linear and Regular Celestial Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (1971)
Sun, F.: Hodograph analysis of the free-flight trajectories between two arbitrary terminal points. Contractor Report CR-153, NASA (1965)
Thompson B.F., Choi K.K., Piggott S.W., Beaver S.R.: Orbital targeting based on hodograph theory for improved rendezvous safety. J. Guidance Control Dyn. 33(5), 1566–1576 (2010)
Tsitouras C.: A tenth order symplectic Runge-Kutta-Nyström method. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 74(4), 223–230 (1999)
Van Flandern T.C., Pukkinen K.F.: Low-precision formulae for planetary positions. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 41, 391–411 (1979)
Visser P., Sneew N., Gerlach C.: Energy integral method for gravity field determination from satellite orbit coordinates. J. Geodesy 77, 207–216 (2003)
Vittaldev, V., Mooij, E., Naeije, M.C.: Performance aspects of orbit propagation using the unified state model. In: AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference (2010)
Vivarelli M.D.: The KS-transformation in hypercomplex form. Celest. Mech. 29, 45–50 (1983)
Vivarelli M.D.: The KS-transformation in hypercomplex form and quantization of the negative-energy orbit manifold of the kepler problem. Celest. Mech. 36, 349–364 (1985)
Waldvogel J.: Quaternions and the perturbed Kepler problem. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 95, 201–212 (2006)
Wertz J.R., Larson W.J.: Space Mission Analysis and Design, 3rd edn. Microcosm Press and Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)
Yoshida H.: A new derivation of the Kustaanheimo–Stiefel variables. Celest. Mech. 28, 239–242 (1982)
Zhang W., Han B., Zhang C.: Spacecraft aerodynamics and trajectory simulation during aerobraking. Appl. Math. Mech. Engl. Ed. 31(9), 1063–1072 (2010)
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Vittaldev, V., Mooij, E. & Naeije, M.C. Unified State Model theory and application in Astrodynamics. Celest Mech Dyn Astr 112, 253–282 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-011-9396-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-011-9396-5