Skip to main content
Log in

A fast tour design method using non-tangent v-infinity leveraging transfer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The announced missions to the Saturn and Jupiter systems renewed the space community interest in simple design methods for gravity assist tours at planetary moons. A key element in such trajectories are the V-Infinity Leveraging Transfers (VILT) which link simple impulsive maneuvers with two consecutive gravity assists at the same moon. VILTs typically include a tangent impulsive maneuver close to an apse location, yielding to a desired change in the excess velocity relative to the moon. In this paper we study the VILT solution space and derive a linear approximation which greatly simplifies the computation of the transfers, and is amenable to broad global searches. Using this approximation, Tisserand graphs, and heuristic optimization procedure we introduce a fast design method for multiple-VILT tours. We use this method to design a trajectory from a highly eccentric orbit around Saturn to a 200-km science orbit at Enceladus. The trajectory is then recomputed removing the linear approximation, showing a Δv change of <4%. The trajectory is 2.7 years long and comprises 52 gravity assists at Titan, Rhea, Dione, Tethys, and Enceladus, and several deterministic maneuvers. Total Δv is only 445 m/s, including the Enceladus orbit insertion, almost 10 times better then the 3.9 km/s of the Enceladus orbit insertion from the Titan–Enceladus Hohmann transfer. The new method and demonstrated results enable a new class of missions that tour and ultimately orbit small mass moons. Such missions were previously considered infeasible due to flight time and Δv constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

α :

Pump angle between the v vector and the minor body velocity vector

δ :

Turning angle between the incoming and outgoing v vectors of a gravity assist

\({\gamma_{v\infty1}^{s}}\) :

Section of the VILT solution manifold for a given s and v ∞1

Δθ :

Spacecraft angular gain

σ i :

Element of s: if + 1 denotes a long ith arc, if − 1 denotes a short ith arc

μ M , μ P :

Gravitational parameter of the minor and major body

EI :

Element of s: if + 1 denotes exterior VILTs, if −1 denotes interior VILTs

f, E, M:

True, eccentric and mean anomaly of the spacecraft with respect to the major body

n :

Number of minor body revolutions during the VILT

m :

Number of major body revolutions during the VILT

k i :

Element of s: number of full revolutions in the ith arc

r π :

Pericenter of the gravity assist hyperbola

r a , r p , a:

Apocenter, pericenter and semi-major axis of the spacecraft with respect to the major body

r LA , r VA :

Leveraging and vacant apses of the spacecraft with respect to the major body, i.e. the furthers and closest apse to r = 1 respectively

s :

VILT parameter vector; in particular s = (σ 1, k 1, σ 2, k 2, n, EI)

v p , v a :

Velocity of the spacecraft at pericenter and at apocenter with respect to the major body

v :

Velocity of the spacecraft relative to the moon at r = 1

\({\fancyscript {V}^{\,\,s}}\) :

VILT solution manifold

1, 2:

Subscripts indicates the first or second arc

References

  • Abraham R., Marsden J.E., Ratiu T.S.: Manifold, Tensor, Analysis, and Applications, pp. 107–108–174–175. Springer, Berlin (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, A.T., Russell, R.P.: Pathfinding and v-infinity leveraging for planetary moon tour missions. In: Proceedings of the AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Savannah, GA, paper AAS 09-222 (2009)

  • Campagnola S., Russell R.P.: Endgame problem part 1: V-infinity leveraging technique and leveraging graph. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 33(2), 463–475 (2010). doi:10.2514/1.44258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campagnola S., Russell R.P.: Endgame problem part 2: multi-body technique and T–P graph. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 33(2), 476–486 (2010). doi:10.2514/1.44290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doedel E.J., Keller H.B., Kernévez J.P.: Numerical analysis and control of bifurcation problems: (i) bifurcation in finite dimension. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 1(3), 493–520 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar R.W., Dunham D.W., McAdams J.V.: NEAR mission overview and trajectory design. J. Astronaut. Sci. 43(4), 353–371 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, T.D., Gray, D.L., Hahn, Y.: Cassini maneuver experience: Launch and early cruise. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, & Control Conference, Boston, MA, AIAA Paper 98-4224 (1998)

  • Hollenbeck, G.: New flight techniques for outer planet missions. In: AAS Microfishe series, vol. 26, supplement to the Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 33, Univelt, San Diego, also AAS Paper 75-087 (1975)

  • Kowalkowski, T.D., Johannesen, J.R., Try, L.: Launch period development for the Juno mission to Jupiter. In: AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Honolulu, Hawaii, paper AIAA-2008-7369 (2008)

  • Labunsky A., Papkov O., Sukhanov K.: Multiple Gravity Assist Interplanetary Trajectories, Earth Space Institute Book Series, pp. 33–68. Gordon and Breach Publishers, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, A.H., Doig, A.G.: An automatic method of solving discrete programming problems. Econometrica 28(3), 497–520 (1960). http://www.jstor.org/stable/1910129

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams J.V., Dunham D.W., Farquhar R.W., Taylor A.H., Williams B.G.: Trajectory design and maneuver strategy for the MESSENGER mission to Mercury. J. Spacecr. Rockets 43(5), 1054–1064 (2006). doi:10.2514/1.18178

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sims J.A., Longuski J.M., Staugler A.: V-infinity leveraging for interplanetary missions: Multiple-revolution orbit techniques. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 20(3), 409–415 (1997). doi:10.2514/2.4064

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, N.J., Sims, J.A.: Methods for the design of v-infinity leveraging maneuvers. In: Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Univelt, San Diego, vol. 109, pp. 1959–1976, also Paper AAS 01-437 (2001)

  • Strange, N.J., Campagnola, S., Russell, R.P.: Leveraging flybys of low mass moons to enable an Enceladus orbiter. In: Proceedings of the Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, paper AAS 09-435. Submitted to Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets (2009a)

  • Strange, N.J., Spilker, T.L., Landau, D.F., Lam, T., Lyons, D.T., Guzman, J.J.: Mission design for the Titan Saturn System Mission concept. In: Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, paper AAS 09-356 (2009b)

  • Uphoff, C., Roberts, P.H., Friedman, L.D.: Orbit design concepts for Jupiter orbiter missions. In: AIAA Mechanics and Control Conference, Anaheim, California, AIAA Paper 74-781 (1974)

  • Vasile M., Campagnola S.: Design of low-thrust multi-gravity assist trajectories to Europa. J. Br. Interplanet. Soc. 62(1), 15–31 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S.N.: Automated design of multiple encounter gravity-assist trajectories. Master’s thesis, Purdue University, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, West Lafayette, IN (1990)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Campagnola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campagnola, S., Strange, N.J. & Russell, R.P. A fast tour design method using non-tangent v-infinity leveraging transfer. Celest Mech Dyn Astr 108, 165–186 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-010-9295-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-010-9295-1

Keywords

Navigation