Skip to main content
Log in

The Relative Motion of Earth Orbiting Satellites

  • Published:
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relative motion of objects moving in a close satellite formation is studied. The relative motion is expressed in the satellite reference frame R Λ B defined by orthogonal unit vectors in the radial, transverse and normal directions. Differential perturbations in orbital elements, satellite positions as well as in the radial, transverse and normal components of the radius vector are defined. Differential perturbations due to geopotential coefficients and luni-solar attraction are analysed for some exemplary satellites orbits. Results of a numerical analysis of motion have shown that the geopotential coefficients up to high degree and order as well as lunisolar effects have to be included into the applied force model to save the meter or centimeter level of accuracy in the description of the relative satellite motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfriend, K. T., Schaub, H. and Gim, D. W.: 2000, ‘Gravitational perturbations, non-linearity and circular orbit assumption effects on formation flying control strategies’ Paper No., AAS 00-012, also Advances in the Astronautical Sciences 104, 139–158

  • S. Casotto (1993) ArticleTitle‘The Mapping of Kaula’s solution into the orbital reference frame’ Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 55 223–241 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00692511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. K. Cheng (2002) ArticleTitle‘Gravitational perturbation theory for intersatellite tracking’ Journal of Geodesy 76 169–185 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00190-001-0233-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.-W. Gim K. T. Alfriend (2001) ArticleTitle‘The state transition matrix of relative motion for the perturbed non-circular reference orbit’ AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics conference also. Adv. Astronaut. Sci. 108 913–934

    Google Scholar 

  • Gim, D.-W. and Alfriend, K. T.: 2005, ‘Satellite relative motion using differential equinoctial elements’, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy (in print).

  • J. G. Neelson P. J. Cefola R. J. Prolux (1998) ArticleTitle‘Current development of the Draper Semianalytical Satellite Theory standalone orbit propagator package’ Advances in the Astronautical Sciences 97 2037–2051

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabol, C., Burns, R. and McLaughlin, C. A.: 2001,‘Satellite formation flying design and evolution’, AIAA JSR 38(2).

  • L. G. Taff (1985) ‘Celestial mechanics a Computional Guide for the Practitioner Wiley In., publication New York

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Wnuk (1995) ‘Second order perturbations due to the gravity potential of a Planet’ A. E. Roy B. A. Steves (Eds) From Newton to Chaos Plenum Press New York 259–267

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justyna Golebiewska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wnuk, E., Golebiewska, J. The Relative Motion of Earth Orbiting Satellites. Celestial Mech Dyn Astr 91, 373–389 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-004-4265-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-004-4265-0

Keywords

Navigation