Antecedent Strategies to Promote Children’s and Adolescents’ Compliance with Adult Requests: A Review of the Literature



Compliance with adult requests and directives has often been described as a keystone behavior in children, meaning it is associated with engagement in other desirable and socially appropriate behaviors. As such, a great deal of research has been directed toward identifying strategies that increase compliance in children. Antecedent strategies, which focus on increasing the probability of compliance prior to or during the delivery of the directive or request, are popular because they have the potential to prevent noncompliance; however, it is not clear which of the numerous antecedent strategies are effective or for whom. Therefore, a systematic review of the antecedent strategies for compliance was completed. Forty-two studies were identified evaluating eight different antecedent strategies for children aged 1–19. It was determined that high-probability command sequences, effective instruction delivery, and errorless compliance training may all be considered evidence-based antecedent strategies to increase children’s compliance with adult requests.


Antecedent Compliance Children Adolescents 


  1. *References marked with an asterisk denote articles that were included in the review.Google Scholar
  2. Allday, R. A., & Pakurar, K. (2007). Effects of teacher greetings on student on-task behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 317–320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. *Ardoin, S., Martens, B., & Wolfe, L. (1999). Using high-probability instruction sequences with fading to increase student compliance during transitions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 339–351.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. *Austin, J. L., & Agar, G. (2005). Helping young children follow their teachers’ directions: The utility of high probability command sequences in pre-k and kindergarten classrooms. Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 222–236.Google Scholar
  5. *Axelrod, M. I., & Zank, A. J. (2012). Increasing classroom compliance: Using a high-probability command sequence with noncompliant students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21, 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, D. W., Bauer, A. M., Erhardt, K. E., Lentz, F. E., & Stollar, S. A. (1996). Keystone targets for change: Planning for widespread positive consequences. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bean, A. W., & Roberts, M. W. (1981). The effect of time-out release contingencies on changes in child noncompliance. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 9, 95–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. *Belfiore, P. J., Basile, S. P., & Lee, D. L. (2008). Using a high probability command sequence to increase classroom compliance: The role of behavioral momentum. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 160–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. *Bellipanni, K. D., Tingstrom, D. H., Olmi, D. J., & Roberts, D. S. (2013). The sequential introduction of positive antecedent and consequent components in a compliance training package with elementary students. Behavior Modification, 37, 768–789.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Carr, E. G., Dunlap, G., Horner, R. H., Koegel, R. L., Turnbull, A. P., Sailor, W., et al. (2002). Positive behavior support: Evolution of an applied science. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chambless, D. L., Baker, M. J., Baucom, D. H., Beutler, L. E., Calhoun, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., et al. (1998). Update on empirically validated therapies, II. The Clinical Psychologist, 51, 3–16.Google Scholar
  12. Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685–716.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Christophersen, E. R. (1986). Little people: A common sense guide to child rearing (3rd ed.). Kansas City, MO: Westport Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. *Cote, C. A., Thompson, R. H., & McKerchar, P. M. (2005). The effects of antecedent interventions and extinction on toddlers’ compliance during transitions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 235–238.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. *Davis, C. A., Brady, M. P., Williams, R. E., & Hamilton, R. (1992). Effects of high-probability requests on the acquisition and generalization of responses to requests in young children with behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 905–916.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. *Ducharme, J. M., Atkinson, L., & Poulton, L. (2000). Success-based, noncoercive treatment of oppositional behavior in children from violent homes. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 995–1004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. *Ducharme, J. M., Atkinson, L., & Poulton, L. (2001). Errorless compliance training with physically abusive mothers: A single-case approach. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25, 855–868.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. *Ducharme, J. M., Di Padova, T., & Ashworth, M. (2010). Errorless compliance training to reduce extreme conduct problems and intrusive control strategies in home and school settings. Clinical Case Studies, 9, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. *Ducharme, J. M., & DiAdamo, C. (2005). An errorless approach to management of noncompliance in a special education setting. School Psychology Review, 34, 107–115.Google Scholar
  21. *Ducharme, J. M., & Drain, T. L. (2004). Errorless academic compliance training: Improving generalized cooperation with parental requests in children with autism. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 163–171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. *Ducharme, J. M., & Ng, O. (2012). Errorless academic compliance training: A school-based application for young students with autism. Behavior Modification, 36, 650–669.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. *Ducharme, J. M., Pontes, E., Guger, S., Crozier, K., Lucas, H., & Popynick, M. (1994). Errorless compliance to parental requests II: Increasing clinical practicality through abbreviation of treatment parameters. Behavior Therapy, 25, 469–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. *Ducharme, J. M., & Popynick, M. (1993). Errorless compliance to parental requests: Treatment effects and generalization. Behavior Therapy, 24, 2098–2226.Google Scholar
  25. *Ducharme, J. M., Popynick, M., Pontes, E., & Steele, S. (1996). Errorless compliance to parental requests III: Group parent training with parent observational data and long-term follow-up. Behavior Therapy, 27, 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. *Ducharme, J. M., Sanjuan, E., & Drain, T. L. (2007). Errorless compliance training: Success-focused behavioral treatment of children with Asperger syndrome. Behavior Modification, 31, 329–344.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ducharme, J. M., & Shecter, C. (2011). Bridging the gap between clinical and classroom intervention: Keystone approaches for students with challenging behavior. School Psychology Review, 40, 257–274.Google Scholar
  28. *Ducharme, J. M., Spencer, T., Davidson, A., & Rushford, N. (2002). Errorless compliance training: Building a cooperative relationship between parents with brain injury and their oppositional children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72, 585–595.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. *Ducharme, J. M., & Worling, D. E. (1994). Behavioral momentum and stimulus fading in the acquisition and maintenance of child compliance in the home. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 639–647.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Eckert, T. L., Ardoin, S. P., Daly, E. J., & Martens, B. K. (2002). Improving oral reading fluency: A brief experimental analysis of combining an antecedent intervention with consequences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 271–281.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Eisenstadt, T. H., Eyberg, S., McNeil, C. B., Newcomb, K., & Funderburk, B. (1993). Parent–child interaction therapy with behavior problem children: Relative effectiveness of two stages and overall treatment outcome. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 22, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. *Everett, G. E., Olmi, D. J., Edwards, R. P., & Tingstrom, D. H. (2005). The contributions of eye contact and contingent praise to effective instruction delivery in compliance training. Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 48–62.Google Scholar
  33. *Ford, A. D., Olmi, D. J., Edwards, R. P., & Tingstrom, D. H. (2001). The sequential introduction of compliance training components with elementary-aged children in general education classroom settings. School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 142–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Forehand, R. (1977). Child noncompliance to parental requests: Behavioral analysis and treatment. Progress in Behavior Modification, 5, 111–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Forehand, R., Sturgis, E. T., McMahon, R. J., Aguar, D., Green, K., Wells, K. C., & Breiner, J. (1979). Parent behavioral training to modify child noncompliance: Treatment generalization across time and from home to school. Behavior Modification, 3, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gershoff, E. T. (2002). Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 539–579.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. *Goetz, E. M., Holmberg, M. C., & LeBlanc, J. M. (1975). Differential reinforcement of other behavior and noncontingent reinforcement as control procedures during the modification of a preschooler’s compliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 77–82.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. *Hamlet, C. C., Axelrod, S., & Kuerschner, S. (1984). Eye contact as an antecedent to compliant behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 553–557.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. *Houlihan, D., Jacobson, L., & Brandon, P. K. (1994). Replication of a high-probability request sequence with varied interprompt times in a preschool setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 737–738.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. *Kennedy, C. H., Itkonen, T., & Lindquist, K. (1995). Comparing interspersed requests and social comments as antecedents for increasing student compliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 97–98.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kern, L., & Clemens, N. H. (2007). Antecedent strategies to promote appropriate classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from
  43. Mace, F. C., Hock, M. L., Lalli, J. S., West, B. J., Belfiore, P., Pinter, E., & Brown, D. K. (1998). Behavioral momentum in the treatment of noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. *Mackay, S., McLaughlin, T. F., Weber, K., & Derby, K. M. (2001). The use of precision requests to decrease noncompliance in the home and neighborhood: A case study. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 23, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. *Mandal, R. L., Olmi, D. J., Edwards, R. P., Tingstrom, D. H., & Benoit, D. A. (2000). Effective instruction delivery and time-in: Positive procedures for achieving child compliance. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 22, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. *Marlow, A. G., Tingstrom, D. H., Olmi, D. J., & Edwards, R. P. (1997). The effects of classroom-based time-in/time-out on compliance rates in children with speech/language disabilities. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 19, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. *Matheson, A. S., & Shriver, M. D. (2005). Training teachers to give effective commands: Effects on student compliance and academic behaviors. School Psychology Review, 34, 202–219.Google Scholar
  48. McMahon, R. J., & Forehand, R. L. (2003). Helping the noncompliant child: A clinician’s guide to effective parenting (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  49. McMahon, R. J., & Forehand, R. L. (2005). Helping the noncompliant child: Family-based treatment for oppositional behavior. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  50. *Olmi, D. J., Sevier, R. C., & Nastasi, D. F. (1997). Time-in/time-out as a response to noncompliance and inappropriate behavior with children with developmental disabilities: Two case studies. Psychology in the Schools, 34, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Owen, D. J., Slep, A. M., & Heyman, R. E. (2012). The effect of praise, positive nonverbal response, reprimand, and negative nonverbal response on child compliance: A systematic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 15, 364–385.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. *Penrod, B., Gardella, L., & Fernand, J. (2012). An evaluation of a progressive high-probability instructional sequence combined with low-probability demand fading in the treatment of food selectivity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 527–537.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. *Powell, S., & Nelson, B. (1997). Effects of choosing academic assignments on a student with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 181–183.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. *Rames-LaPointe, J., Hixon, M. D., Niec, L. N., & Rhymer, K. N. (2014). Evaluation of errorless compliance training in a general education classroom. Behavioral Interventions, 29, 253–267.Google Scholar
  55. *Ray, K. P., Skinner, C. H., & Watson, T. S. (1999). Transferring stimulus control via momentum to increase compliance in a student with autism: A demonstration of collaborative consultation. School Psychology Review, 28, 622–628.Google Scholar
  56. *Roberts, D. S., Tingstrom, D. H., Olmi, D. J., & Bellipanni, K. D. (2008). Positive antecedent and consequent components in child compliance training. Behavior Modification, 32, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. *Rortvedt, A. K., & Miltenberger, R. G. (1994). Analysis of a high-probability instructional sequence and time-out in the treatment of child noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 327–330.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Sainato, D. M., Strain, P. S., Lefebvre, D., & Rapp, N. (1987). Facilitating transition times with handicapped preschool children: A comparison between peer-mediated and antecedent prompt procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 285–291.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Scarboro, M. E., & Forehand, R. (1975). Effects of two types of response-contingent time-out on compliance and oppositional behavior of children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19, 252–264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Schaffer, H. R., & Crook, C. K. (1980). Child compliance and maternal control techniques. Developmental Psychology, 16, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. *Schoen, S. F. (1985). Decreasing noncompliance in a severely handicapped child. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. *Singer, G. H., Singer, J., & Horner, R. H. (1987). Using pretask requests to increase the probability of compliance for students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 12, 287–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Skiba, R. J., Peterson, R. L., & Williams, T. (1997). Office referrals and suspension: Disciplinary intervention in middle schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 295–315.Google Scholar
  64. *Stephenson, K. M., & Hanley, G. P. (2010). Preschoolers’ compliance with simple instructions: A descriptive and experimental evaluation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 229–247.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. *Wilder, D. A., Allison, J., Nicholson, K., Abellon, O. E., & Saulnier, R. (2010). Further evaluation of antecedent interventions on compliance: The effects of rationales to increase compliance among preschoolers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 601–613.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. *Wilder, D. A., Zonneveld, K., Harris, C., Marcus, A., & Reagan, R. (2007). Further analysis of antecedent interventions on preschoolers’ compliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 535–539.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. *Zuluaga, C. A., & Normand, M. P. (2008). An evaluation of the high-probability instruction sequence with and without programmed reinforcement for compliance with high-probability instructions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 453–457.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Southern MississippiHattiesburgUSA

Personalised recommendations