Advertisement

Child & Youth Care Forum

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 517–536 | Cite as

Peer Buddies in the Classroom: The Effects on Spontaneous Conversations in Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Fiorenzo Laghi
  • Antonia Lonigro
  • Susanna Pallini
  • Roberto Baiocco
Original Paper
  • 253 Downloads

Abstract

Background

To date, research on spontaneous social interactions in mixed and non-mixed groups has not included exchanges with peer buddies.

Object

In Study 1, socio-cognitive factors associated with the intention to volunteer to become a peer buddy for students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) were investigated. In Study 2, spontaneous social interactions in adolescents with ASD and a low level of support with selected peer buddies and with other students were compared.

Method

In Study 1, social-cognitive abilities were investigated through the use of self-report questionnaires. Among typically developing students, their willingness to spontaneously volunteer to help a classmate with ASD was evaluated. Moreover, students were required to indicate among their classmates who were competent to volunteer and who were not. In Study 2, social interaction behaviors in mixed and non-mixed groups were observed and opportunely codified.

Results

In Study 1, students expressing the intention to volunteer obtained higher scores on empathy scale and displayed more positive attitudes towards ASD than other classmates. Volunteers were, in turn, selected as peer buddies by their classmates. In Study 2, when students interacted with selected peer buddies engaged in the highest number of social positive interaction behaviors than they did in other kinds of groups. The worst social interactions were observed in non-mixed groups.

Conclusions

Social behavior displayed by students with ASD appeared strongly influenced by social partners. Students with ASD seemed to more positively benefit from interactions with selected peer buddies compared to other mixed and non-mixed groups.

Keywords

Spontaneous interaction Autism Spectrum Disorder Peer buddies Mixed group Non-mixed group Regular education 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their deep gratitude to students, parents, and teachers who participated in research and to principals and all the staff of the schools involved.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional Sapienza University of Rome and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antinoro Pizzuto, E., & Capobianco, M. (2008). Is pointing “just” pointing? Unraveling the complexity of indexes in spoken and signed discourse. Gesture, 8, 82–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Astington, J. W. (2003). Sometimes necessary, never sufficient: False-belief understanding and social competence. In B. Repacholi & V. Slaughter (Eds.), Individual differences in theory of mind: Implications for typical and atypical development. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  4. Auyeung, B., Allison, C., Wheelwright, S., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2012). Brief report: Development of the adolescent empathy and systemizing quotients. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 2225–2235.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bacon, A. L., Fein, D., Morris, R., Waterhouse, L., & Allen, D. (1998). The responses of autistic children of the distress of others. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 129–142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, J. E. (2003). Social skills training for children and adolescents with Asperger syndrome and social communication problems. Shawnee Mission, KS: Autism Asperger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  7. Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163–175.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Spong, A., Scahill, V., & Lawson, J. (2001). Are intuitive physics and intuitive psychology independent? A test with children with Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders, 5, 47–48.Google Scholar
  9. Bauminger, N. (2002). The facilitation of social–emotional understanding and social interaction in high functioning children with autism: Intervention outcomes. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 283–298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bauminger, N., Shulman, C., & Agam, G. (2003). Peer interaction and loneliness in high-functioning children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 489–507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bauminger, N., Solomon, M., Aviezer, A., Heung, K., Brown, J., & Rogers, S. (2008). Friendship in high-functioning children with ASD: Mixed and non-mixed Dyads. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1211–1229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bauminger, N., Solomon, M., & Rogers, S. J. (2010). Predicting friendship quality in autism spectrum disorders and typical development. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 751–761.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bauminger-Zviely, N., Eden, S., Zancanaro, M., Weiss, P. L., & Gal, E. (2013). Increasing social engagement in high-functioning children with ASD using collaborative technologies in the school. Autism, 17, 317–339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bauminger-Zviely, N., Karin, E., Kimhi, Y., & Agam-Ben-Artzi, G. (2014). Spontaneous peer conversation in preschoolers with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder versus typical development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 363–373.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ben-Zeev, D., Young, M. A., & Corrigan, P. W. (2010). DSM-V and the stigma of mental illness. Journal of Mental Health, 19, 318–327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell, J., Ferguson, J., Herzinger, C., Jackson, J., & Marino, C. (2005). Peers’ attitude toward autism differ across sociometric groups: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 17, 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Capobianco, M., Antinoro Pizzuto, E., & Devescovi, A. (2017). Gesture–speech combinations and early verbal abilities: New longitudinal data in the second year of age. Interaction Studies, 18, 54–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carter, E. W., Common, E. A., Sreckovic, M. A., Huber, H. B., Bottema-Beutel, K., Gustafson, J. R., et al. (2013). Promoting social competence and peer relationships for adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 91–101.Google Scholar
  19. Carter, E. W., Hughes, C., Guth, C. B., & Copeland, S. R. (2005). Factors influencing social interaction among high school students with intellectual disabilities and their general education peers. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110, 366–377.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chan, J. M., Lang, R., Rispoli, M., O’Reilly, M., Sigafoos, J., & Cole, H. (2009). Use of peer-mediated interventions in the treatment of autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 876–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children’s social status: A five-year study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261–282.Google Scholar
  22. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dawson, G., Rogers, S., Munson, J., Smith, M., Winter, J., Greenson, J., et al. (2010). Randomized, controlled trials of an intervention for toddlers with autism: The early start Denver model. Pediatrics, 125, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Di Salvo, C. A., & Oswald, D. P. (2002). Peer-mediated interventions to increase the social interaction of children with autism: Consideration of peer expectancies. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 17, 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eisenberg, N., & Liew, J. (2009). Empathy. In R. A. Shweder, T. R. Bidell, A. C. Dailey, S. D. Dixon, P. J. Miller, & J. Modell (Eds.), The child: An encyclopedic companion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ennals, E., Fossey, F., & Linsey, H. (2015). Postsecondary study and mental ill-health: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research exploring students’ lived experiences. Journal of Mental Health, 24, 111–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ferraioli, S. J., & Harris, S. L. (2011). Effective educational inclusion of students on the autism spectrum. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 41, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Flavell, J. H. (2004). Theory of mind development: Retrospect and prospect. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 50, 274–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gardiner, E., & Iarocci, G. (2014). Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder in the university context: Peer acceptance predicts intention to volunteer. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 1008–1017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gini, G. (2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What’s wrong? Aggressive Behavior, 32, 528–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hallerbäck, M., Lugnegard, T., Hjärthag, F., & Gillberg, C. (2009). the reading the mind in the eyes test: Test–retest reliability of a Swedish version. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 14, 127–248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Harnum, M., Duffy, J., & Ferguson, D. (2007). Adults’ versus children’s perceptions of a child with autism or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1337–1343.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hauck, M., Fein, D., Waterhouse, L., & Feinstein, C. (1995). Social initiations by autistic children to adults and other children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25, 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hermelin, B., & O’Connor, N. (1985). Logico-affective states and nonverbal language. In E. Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.), Communication problems in autism. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  35. Humphrey, N., & Symes, W. (2011). Peer interaction patterns among adolescent with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) in mainstream school settings. Autism, 5, 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jackson, J. N., & Campbell, J. M. (2009). Teachers’ peer buddy selections for children with autism: Social characteristics and relationship with peer nominations. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 269–277.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Koenig, K., White, S. W., Pachler, M., Lau, M., Lewis, M., Klin, A., et al. (2010). Promoting social skill development in children with pervasive developmental disorders: A feasibility and efficacy study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 1209–1218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Laghi, F., Federico, F., Lonigro, A., Levanto, S., Ferraro, M., Baumgartner, E., et al. (2016a). Peer and teacher-selected peer buddies for adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: The role of social, emotional, and mentalizing abilities. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 150, 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Laghi, F., Lonigro, A., Baumgartner, E., & Baiocco, R. (2018a). What does the intention to be a volunteer for a student with autism predict? The role of cognitive brain types and emotion and behavioral characteristics. Psicologia Educativa, 24, 26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Laghi, F., Lonigro, A., Levanto, S., Ferraro, M., Baumgartner, E., & Baiocco, R. (2016b). The role of nice and nasty theory of mind in teacher–selected peer models for adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 49, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Laghi, F., Lonigro, A., Pallini, S., Bechini, A., Gradilone, A., Marziano, G., et al. (2018b). Sibling relationships and family functioning in siblings of early adolescents, adolescents and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27, 793–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Laushey, K. M., & Heflin, L. J. (2000). Enhancing social skills of kindergarten children with Autism through the training of multiple peers as tutors. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 183–193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Locke, J., Fuller, E. R., & Kasari, C. (2012). Exploring the social impact of being a typical model for included children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 42, 1895–1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lonigro, A., Laghi, F., Baiocco, R., & Baumgartner, E. (2014). Mind reading and empathy: Evidence for nice and nasty ToM behaviours in school-aged children. Journal of Child and Family Study, 23, 581–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marans, W. D., Rubin, E., & Laurent, A. (2005). Addressing social communication skills in individuals with high-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: Critical priorities in educational programming. In F. Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of Autism and pervasive developmental disorders (pp. 42–69). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. Mull, M. S., & Evans, E. M. (2010). Did she mean to do it? Acquiring a folk theory of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 207–228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Nevill, R. E., & White, S. W. (2011). College students’ openness toward autism spectrum disorders: Improving peer acceptance. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(12), 1619–1628.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Orsini, A., & Picone, L. (2006). WISC-III. Contributo alla taratura italiana (Eng. Transl. WISC-III. Contribution for the Italian adaption). Firenze: Giunti Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
  49. Petrina, N., Carter, M., & Stephenson, J. (2014). The nature of friendship in children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reiter, S., & Vitani, T. (2007). Inclusion of pupils with autism: The effect of an intervention program on the regular pupils’ burnout, attitudes, and quality of mediation. Autism, 11, 321–333.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Renk, K., & Phares, V. (2004). Cross-informant ratings of social competence in children and adolescents. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 239–254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ronald, A., Happé, F., Hughes, C., & Plomin, R. (2005). Nice and nasty theory of mind in preschool children: Nature and nurture. Social Development, 14, 664–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Saghir, H., Dupuis, A., Chau, T., & Kushki, A. (2017). Atypical autonomic nervous system complexity accompanies social cognition task performance in ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 39, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sigman, M., & Ruskin, E. (1999). Continuity and change in the social competence of children with autism, Downs syndrome, and developmental delays. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 64 (1, Serial No. 256).Google Scholar
  55. Slaughter, V., Dennis, M. J., & Pritchard, M. (2002). Theory of mind and peer acceptance in preschool children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 545–564.  https://doi.org/10.1348/026151002760390945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Balla, D. A. (2003). Vineland adaptive behavior scalesExpanded interview form. [Italian version, G. Balboni & L. Pedrabissi (Eds.)], Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
  57. Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Bullying and theory of mind: A critique of social deficit view of antisocial behaviour. Social Development, 8, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thompson, G. L. (2006). An SPSS implementation of the nonrecursive outlier deletion procedure with shifting z score criterion. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 344–352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Selst, M., & Jolicœur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vogindroukas I., Chelas E. N., & Petridis N. E. (2014). Reading the mind in the eyes test (Children’s Version): a comparison study between children with typical development, children with high-functioning autism and typically developed adults. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 66, 18–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. White, S. W., Ollendick, T. H., & Bray, B. C. (2011). College students on the autism spectrum: Prevalence and associated problems. Autism, 15, 683–701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. World Health Organization (WHO). (2004). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Tenth Revision. Geneva: Author.Google Scholar
  63. Zhang, J., & Wheeler, J. J. (2011). A meta-analysis of peer-mediated interventions for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 62–77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social and Developmental PsychologyUniversity of Rome SapienzaRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of EducationRoma Tre UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations