Abstract
Background
Within the positive youth development (PYD) perspective, internal assets (e.g., social competencies and positive identity) and external assets (e.g., support and empowerment) constitute developmental assets that can facilitate positive youth outcomes. This assertion has been studied mainly in the US context and to a lesser degree in European samples.
Objective
We extend the scope of PYD research by assessing developmental assets among young people in three contexts that differ economically, culturally and politically: Italy, Norway and Turkey. Interactions with gender and parents’ educational level are also examined.
Method
A cross-sectional data on developmental assets was collected from Italian (n = 526, 41% girls), Norwegian (n = 592, 56% girls) and Turkish (n = 116, 63% girls) secondary school students during the 2015/2016 academic year.
Results
In all three countries, most participants had experienced several of the developmental assets although internal assets were reported more often than external assets. Country differences were observed, where young people in Norway and Turkey reported more assets than their Italian counterparts did. An interaction between country and gender revealed that girls in Norway reported the highest number of developmental assets. In addition, participants in Italy who had fathers with higher educational level reported most of the constructive use of time assets.
Conclusion
Differences in the experience of the assets among young people appear to be a reflection of the economic, social, cultural and political structures of the respective countries.
References
Benson, P. L. (1990). The troubled journey: A portrait of 6th-12th grade youth. Minneapolis: Search Institute.
Benson, P. L. (2007). Developmental assets: An overview of theory, research, and practice. In R. Silbereisen & R. Lerner (Eds.), Approaches to positive youth development (pp. 33–59). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Benson, P. L., Scales, P. C., & Syvertsen, A. K. (2011). The contribution of the developmental assets framework to positive youth development theory and practice. In R. M. Lerner, J. V. Lerner, & J. B. Benson (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior: Positive youth development research and applications for promoting thriving in adolescence (pp. 198–232). London: Elsevier.
Bergan, Ø. (2017). Country sheet on youth policy in Norway. Youth partnership: Partnership between the European Commission and the Council of Europe in the field of youth. Retrieved from http://pjp-eu.coe.int/en/web/youth-partnership/background-information-on-youth-policy.
Chen, F. N., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 36, 462–494.
Conway, R. J., Heary, C., & Hogan, M. J. (2015). An evaluation of the measurement properties of the five cs model of positive youth development. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01941.
Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 294–304.
Drescher, C. F., Chin, E. G., Johnson, L. R., & Johnson-Pynn, J. S. (2012). Exploring developmental assets in Ugandan youth. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 4, 500–520.
Equality (2014). The Norwegian Government’s gender equality action plan. Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/BLD/Action_plan_2014.pdf.
Erentaitė, R., & Raižienė, S. (2015). Lithuanian version of measure of positive youth development based on the Five Cs model. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 701–717.
Erola, J., Jalonen, S., & Lehti, H. (2016). Parental education, class and income over early life course and children’s achievement. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 44, 33–43.
Eurostat (2017). Youth population. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/youth/data/database.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
Leffert, N., Benson, R. L., Scales, Ρ. C., Sharma, Α., Drake, D., & Blydi, D. A. (1998). Developmental assets: Measurement and prediction of risk behaviors among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 209–230.
Lerner, R. (2017). Commentary: Studying and testing the positive youth development model: A tale of two approaches. Child Development, 88, 1183–1185.
Lerner, R. M., Alberts, A. E., Jelicic, H., & Smith, L. M. (2006). Young people are resources to be developed: Promoting positive youth development through adult-youth relations and community assets. In E. G. Clary & J. E. Rhodes (Eds.), Mobilizing adults for positive youth development: Strategies for closing the gap between beliefs and behavior (pp. 19–39). New York: Springer.
Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., & Colleagues (2013). The positive development of youth: Comprehensive findings from the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. Retrieved from www.4-h.org/about/youth-development-research/positive-youth-development-study.
Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Bowers, E., & Geldhof, G. J. (2015). Positive youth development and relational developmental systems. In W. F. Overton & P. C. Molenaar (Eds.), R. M. Lerner (Editor-in-Chief) R Theory and method. Vol 1 of the handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed., pp. 607–651). Hoboken: Wiley.
Lerner, R. M., von Eye, A., Lerner, J. V., & Lewin-Bizan, S. (2009). Exploring the foundations and functions of adolescent thriving within the 4-H study of positive youth development: A view of the issues. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 567–570.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.
Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (1998). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Rota, S. (2015). Country sheet on youth policy in Italy. Youth partnership: Partnership between the European Commission and the Council of Europe in the field of youth. Retrieved from http://pjp-eu.coe.int/en/web/youth-partnership/background-information-on-youth-policy.
Scales, P. C. (2011). Youth developmental assets in global perspective: Results from international adaptations of the developmental assets profile. Child Indicators Research, 4, 619–645.
Scales, Ρ. C., Benson, R. L., Leffert, N., & Blyth, D. A. (2000). Contribution of developmental assets to the prediction of thriving among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 27–46.
Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., Roehlkepartain, E. C., Sesma, A., & van Dulmen, M. (2006a). The role of developmental assets in predicting academic achievement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 691–708.
Scales, P. C., & Leffert, N. (2004). Developmental assets: A synthesis of the scientific research on adolescent development. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute.
Scales, P. C., Roehlkepartain, E. C., Neal, M., Kielsmeier, J. C., & Benson, P. L. (2006b). Reducing academic achievement gaps: The role of community service and service learning. Journal of Experiential Education, 29, 38–60.
Search Institute (2007). 40 developmental assets for adolescents. Retrieved from http://www.search-institute.org.
Sener, T. (2017). Country sheet on youth policy in Turkey. In Youth partnership: Partnership between the European Commission and the Council of Europe in the field of youth. Retrieved from http://pjp-eu.coe.int/en/web/youth-partnership/background-information-on-youth-policy.
Statistic solutions (2018). Conduct and interpret a factorial ANOVA. Retrieved from http://www.statisticssolutions.com/conduct-interpret-factorial-anova/.
Theokas, C., & Lerner, R. M. (2006). Observed ecological assets in families, schools, and neighborhoods: Conceptualization, measurement and relations with positive and negative developmental outcomes. Applied Developmental Science, 10, 61–74.
Youth Policy: Italy (2014). Youth policy factsheets: Italy. Retrieved from http://www.youthpolicy.org/factsheets/country/italy/.
Youth Policy: Norway (2014). Youth policy factsheets: Norway. Retrieved from http://www.youthpolicy.org/factsheets/country/norway/.
Youth Policy: Turkey (2014). Youth policy factsheets: Turkey. Retrieved from http://www.youthpolicy.org/factsheets/country/turkey/.
Yurttagüler, L. (2016). The impact of youth policies in Turkey. Working Papers, No. 10, Power2Youth. ISSN 2283-5792.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway. We would like to thank the reviewers and editors for their valuable comments and suggestions. We acknowledge also our youth participants in Italy, Norway and Turkey for their engagement in the present study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wiium, N., Dost-Gözkan, A. & Kosic, M. Developmental Assets Among Young People in Three European Contexts: Italy, Norway and Turkey. Child Youth Care Forum 48, 187–206 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-018-9446-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-018-9446-1