Abstract
Background
There are many appealing reasons to support kinship foster care as an alternative to other types of out-of-home care. In South Korea, however, less is known about whether or not kinship foster care is beneficial for children’s development, and nothing is known about how kinship foster care compares with other types of out-of-home care in terms of its associations with children’s developmental outcomes.
Objective
This study aimed to examine the associations between kinship foster care and children’s school adjustment, which were separately compared with institutional and group home care.
Methods
This study used data from a nationally representative sample of 414 children in out-of-home care in South Korea and employed propensity score weighting to address selection bias.
Results
The main analyses revealed that the children in kinship foster care showed more bonding to school and less misbehavior at school than the children in institutional care. Children in grandparent foster care also showed more bonding to school than those in group home care. Interaction analyses suggested that the associations between specific types of kinship foster care and children’s school adjustment varied by the child’s gender and the presence of a biological father.
Conclusions
Implications for research, policy, and practice to improve the healthy development of children in out-of-home care were discussed based upon the results.

Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen, S. H., & Fallesen, P. (2015). Family matters? The effect of kinship care on foster care disruption rates. Child Abuse and Neglect, 48, 68–79.
Austin, P. C. (2011). An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(3), 399–424.
Barth, R. P., Guo, S., & McCrae, J. S. (2008). Propensity score matching strategies for evaluation the success of child and family service programs. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(3), 212–222.
Berrick, J. D., Barth, R. P., & Needell, B. (1994). A comparison of kinship foster homes and foster family homes: Implications for kinship foster care as family preservation. Children and Youth Services Review, 16(1/2), 33–63.
Blumenthal, K. (1983). Making foster care responsive. In B. G. McGowan & W. Meezan (Eds.), Child welfare: Current dilemmas, future directions (pp. 93–141). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101(4), 568–586.
Brown, S. L., & Brown, R. M. (2006). Selective investment theory: Recasting the functional significance of close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 17(1), 1–29.
Brown, S., Cohon, D., & Wheeler, R. (2002). African American extended families and kinship care: How relevant is the foster care model for kinship care? Children and Youth Services Review, 24(1/2), 53–77.
Child Welfare League of America. (1994). Kinship care: A national bridge. Washington, DC: Author.
Choi, H. K., & Kim, H. M. (2007). A study on school adjustment of grandchildren raised by custodial grandparents and contributing factors. Journal of Social Science, 18, 161–181.
Chung, I. J. (2010). Results of basic analysis of Korea Foster Care Panel. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare.
Chung, I. J., Chun, J., Woo, S., Kang, H., & Lee, J. A. (2012). The factors influencing service outcomes of group homes and residential care centers: Focusing on Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 33(4), 107–127.
Coddington, R. D. (1972). The significant of life events as etiologic factors in the diseases of children. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 16(3), 7–18.
Farmer, E., & Moyers, S. (2008). Kinship care: Fostering effective family and friends placements. London, GBR: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Font, S. A. (2014). Kinship and nonrelative foster care: The effect of placement type on child well-being. Child Development, 85(5), 2074–2090.
Geen, R. (2004). The evolution of kinship care policy and practice. Future of Children, 14(1), 131–149.
Gibson-Davis, C., & Foster, E. (2006). A cautionary tale: Using propensity scores to estimate the effect of food stamps on food insecurity. Social Service Review, 80(1), 93–126.
Green, Y. R., & Goodman, C. C. (2010). Understanding birthparent involvement in kinship families: Influencing factors and the importance of placement arrangement. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(10), 1357–1364.
Grogan-Kaylor, A. (2000). Who goes into kinship care? The relationship of child and family characteristics to placement into kinship foster care. Social Work Research, 24(3), 132–141.
Guo, S. (2015). Shaping social work science: What should quantitative researchers do? Research on Social Work Practice, 25(3), 370–381.
Guo, S., & Fraser, M. (2014). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Harden, B. J. (2004). Safety and stability for foster children: A developmental perspective. Future of Children, 14(1), 31–47.
Hawkins, J. D., Doueck, H. J., & Lishner, D. M. (1988). Changing teaching practices in mainstream classrooms to improve bonding and behavior of low achievers. American Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 31–50.
Hawkins, J. D., Guo, J., Hill, K. G., Battin-Pearson, S., & Abbott, R. D. (2001). Long-term effects of the Seattle Social Development Intervention on school bonding trajectories. Applied Developmental Science, 5(4), 225–236.
Heggeness, M. L., & Davis, E. E. (2008). Youth placed out-of-home for behavioral reasons: An analysis of characteristics, type of placements, and length of stay. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Population Center.
Henry, K. L., Stanley, L. R., Edwards, R. W., Harkabus, L. C., & Chapin, L. A. (2009). Individual and contextual effects of school adjustment on adolescent alcohol use. Prevention Science, 10(3), 236–247.
Huh, N. S. (2000). To develop foster home care system in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Child Welfare, 9, 263–287.
Huh, N. S. (2004). Kinship care and foster family homes and their service desire: A comparison of care giver characteristics and children’s psycho-social behavior. Journal of the Korean Society of Child Welfare, 18, 243–270.
Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5–86.
Jeong, S. W. (2002). The influence of original family relationship on psychosocial adaptation of adolescent in institutional care. Journal of the Korean Society of Child Welfare, 14, 145–168.
Kang, H., Chung, I. J., Chun, J., Nho, C. R., & Woo, S. (2014). The outcomes of foster care in South Korea ten years after its foundation: A comparison with institutional care. Children and Youth Services Review, 39, 135–143.
Kaur, S. (2012). A study of adjustment of high school students in relation to their achievement, sex and locality. International Journal of Research in Education, Methodology Council For Innovative Research, 1(2), 18–21.
Kim, E. J. (2012). Caregiving reward of grandmothers raising infant grandchildren and factors influencing their rewards. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society, 32(3), 851–867.
Kim, K. S. (2013). The knowledge of grouphome for children and youth. Seoul: Hakjisa.
Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2014). Yearbook of health and welfare statistics. Sejong: Author.
Korean United Nations Committee on the Right of the Child. (2003). Consideration of report submitted by States parties under article 44 of the Convention: Conducting observations: Republic of Korea. Geneva: Author.
Lawler, M. J. (2008). Maltreated children’s emotional availability with kin and non-kin foster mothers: A sociobiological perspective. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(10), 1131–1143.
Le Prohn, N. S. (1994). The role of the kinship foster parent: A comparison of the role conception of relative and non-relative foster parents. Children and Youth Services Reviews, 16(1/2), 65–84.
Lee, J. A. B., & Nisivoccia, D. (1989). Walk a mile in my shoes. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
Lee, R., Zhai, F., Brooks-Gunn, J., Han, W.-J., & Waldfogel, J. (2014). Head Start participation and school readiness: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study–birth cohort. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 202–215.
Libbey, H. P. (2004). Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 274–283.
Lutman, E., & Barter, C. (2016). Peer violence in foster care: A review of the research evidence. Child and Family Social Work. doi:10.1111/cfs.12284.
McCrae, J. S., Lee, B. R., Barth, R. P., & Rauktis, M. E. (2010). Comparing three years of well-being outcomes for youth in group care and nonkinship foster care. Child Welfare, 89(2), 229–249.
McWey, L. M., Acock, A., & Porter, B. E. (2010). The impact of continued contact with biological parents upon the mental health of children in foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(10), 1338–1345.
Messing, J. T. (2006). From the child’s perspective: A qualitative analysis of kinship care placements. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(12), 1415–1434.
Nho, C. R., Woo, S., Chung, I. J., Kang, H., & Chun, J. (2015). Out-of-home care and economic evaluation. Seoul: Hakjisa.
Paramanik, J., Saha, B., & Mondal, B. C. (2014). Adjustment of secondary school students with respect to gender and residence. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(12), 1138–1143.
Perry, K. E., & Weinstein, R. S. (1998). The social context of early schooling and children’s school adjustment. Educational Psychologist, 33(4), 177–194.
Royston, P. (2005). Multiple imputation of missing values: Update of ICE. The Stata Journal, 5(4), 527–536.
Rubin, D. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: Wiley.
Schwartz, A. (2007). “Caught” vs. “taught”: Ethnic identity and the ethnic socialization experiences of African American adolescents in kin and non-kin foster placements. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(9), 1201–1219.
Shlonsky, A. R., & Berrick, J. D. (2001). Assessing and promoting quality in kin and nonkin foster care. Social Service Review, 75(1), 60–83.
Taylor, C. A., Liang, B., Tracy, A. J., Williams, L. M., & Seigle, P. (2002). Gender differences in middle school adjustment, physical fighting, and social skills: Evaluation of a social competency program. Journal of Primary Prevention, 23(2), 259–272.
Testa, M. F., & Slack, K. S. (2002). The gift of kinship foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 24(1/2), 79–108.
Trout, A. L., Hagaman, J., Casey, K., Reid, R., & Epstein, M. H. (2008). The academic status of children and youth in out-of-home care: A review of the literature. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(9), 979–994.
Vanschoonlandt, F., Vanderfaeillie, J., Van Holen, F., De Maeyer, S., & Andries, C. (2012). Kinship and non-kinship foster care: Differences in contact with parents and foster child’s mental health problems. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(8), 1533–1539.
Welsh, W. N. (2000). The effects of school climate on school disorder. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 567(1), 88–107.
Wentzel, K. R. (2005). Peer relations, motivation, and academic performance at school. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 279–296). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Wu, Q., White, K. R., & Coleman, K. L. (2015). Effects of kinship care on behavioral problems by child age: A propensity score analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 57, 1–8.
Zhai, F., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Waldfogel, J. (2011). Head Start and urban children’s school readiness: A birth cohort study in 18 cities. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 134–152.
Acknowledegments
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2013S1A3A2055259). This work was also supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official view of the NRF or the Soonchunhyang University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Author RaeHyuck Lee declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Hyunah Kang declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This study does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, R., Chun, J., Chung, IJ. et al. Kinship Foster Care and School Adjustment: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Sample of Children in Out-of-Home Care in South Korea. Child Youth Care Forum 46, 335–356 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-016-9380-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-016-9380-z


