Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Psychosocial Influences Upon the Workforce and Professional Development Participation of Family Child Care Providers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child & Youth Care Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Family child care is commonly used in the US by families, including by those receiving child care subsidies. Psychosocial influences upon the workforce and professional development participation of family child care providers (FCCPs) have implications for the investment of public dollars that aim to improve quality and stability of child care.

Objective

We examined psychosocial influences upon workforce and professional development participation of FCCPs. We hypothesized lower levels of psychosocial stress and higher levels of peer support would be associated with less consideration of exit. We hypothesized that those providers embracing a greater sense of themselves as ECE professionals and reporting the support of professional peers would have greater participation in professional development.

Methods

This study employed the use of administrative survey data in path modeling.

Results

Multivariate analyses of survey data indicated that psychosocial stress had a significant, positive association with consideration of exit. In contrast, perceived peer support had a significant, negative association with consideration of exit. A stronger sense of identity as an early care and education professional had a significant, positive association with professional development participation as measured by training hours completed in the past year. The support of professional peers was not observed to have a significant association with professional development participation.

Conclusion

Results suggest the importance of considering psychosocial factors in planning workforce development and educational programs for FCCPs. This may include developing supports to help FCCPs cope with the psychosocial stress of care work, build professional identities, and connect with peer providers to promote stability and quality caregiving in the ECE workforce. We propose additional qualitative research aimed at understanding the context of FCC care as a mechanism for informing the development of these supports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The National Survey of Early Care and Education did not specifically ask home-based caregivers if they were licensed. Listed providers were those individuals on state and nationally generated lists of child care including licensed, regulated, license-exempt, or registered home-based providers. The estimate of unlisted providers was generated by household surveys. It includes caregivers receiving payment for the care of at least one child.

References

  • Armenia, A. B. (2009). More than motherhood: Reasons for becoming a family day care provider. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 554–574. doi:10.1177/0192513X08324379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, S., & Osborne, S. (1994). Provider perspectives on the content and delivery of training for family day care. Child & Youth Care Forum, 23, 329–338. doi:10.1007/BF02209066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, J. J., Carson, R. L., Apavaloaie, L., & Tsouloupas, C. (2009). Uncovering common stressful factors and coping strategies among childcare providers. Child & Youth Care Forum, 38, 239–251. doi:10.1007/s10566-009-9079-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J., Burchinal, M., McCartney, K., Vandell, D. L., Clarke-Stewart, K. A., Owen, M. T., & NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2007). Are there long-term effects of early child care? Child Development, 78, 681–701. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01021.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bollin, G. G. (1993). An investigation of job stability and job satisfaction among family day care providers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 207–220. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(05)80091-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromer, J., & Bibbs, T. (2011). Improving support services for family child care through relationship-based training. Zero to Three, 31(5), 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromer, J., McCabe, L. A., & Porter, T. (2013). Special section on understanding and improving quality in family child care: Introduction and commentary. Early Childhood Research Quarterly., 28, 875–878. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromer, J., Van Haitsma, M., Daley, K., & Modigliani, K. (2009). Staffed support networks and quality in family child care: The family child care network impact study. Chicago, IL: Erikson Institute, Herr Research Center for Children and Social Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buell, M. J., Pfister, I., & Gamel-McCormick, M. (2002). Caring for the caregiver: Early head start/family child care partnerships. Infant Mental Health Journal [Special Issue], 23(1–2), 213–230. doi:10.1002/imhj.10013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchinal, M., Howes, C., & Kontos, S. (2002). Structural predictors of child care quality in child care homes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 87–105. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00132-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, D. J., Lower, J. K., Kintner-Duffy, V. L., Hegde, A. V., & Shim, J. (2011). The day-to-day reality of teacher turnover in preschool classrooms: An analysis of classroom context and teacher, director, and parent perspectives. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25, 1–23. doi:10.1080/02568543.2011.533118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child Care and Development Fund Program (2015) 80 Fed. Reg 80465 (proposed Dec. 24, 2015) (to be codified at 45 CFR pt. 98).

  • Clarke-Stewart, K. A., Vandell, D. L., Burchinal, M., O’Brien, M., & McCartney, K. (2002). Do regulable features of child-care homes affect children’s development? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 52–86. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00133-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the US. In S. Spacapam & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social psychology of health: Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Schipper, E. J., Riksen-Walraven, J. M., Geurts, S. A. E., & de Weerth, C. (2009). Cortisol levels of caregivers in child care centers as related to the quality of their caregiving. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, 55–63. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBord, K., & Sawyers, J. (1996). The effects of training on the quality of family child care for those associated with and not associated with professional child care organizations. Child & Youth Care Forum, 25, 7–15. doi:10.1007/BF02589271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, G., Forer, B., Lero, D. S., Goelman, H., & LaGrange, A. (2006). Predictors of quality in family child care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 296–312. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.07.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elicker, J., Fortner-Wood, C., & Noppe, I. C. (1999). The context of infant attachment in family child care. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 20, 319–336. doi:10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00019-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 532–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forry, N. D., & Hofferth, S. L. (2011). Maintaining work: The influence of child care subsidies on child care-related work disruptions. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 346–368. doi:10.1177/0192513X10384467.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Forry, N., Iruka, I., Tout, K., Torquati, J., Susman-Stillman, A., Bryant, D., & Daneri, M. P. (2013). Predictors of quality and child outcomes in family child care settings. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(4), 893–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuligni, A. S., Howes, C., Lara-Cinisomo, S., & Karoly, L. (2009). Diverse pathways in early childhood professional development: An exploration of early educators in public preschools, private preschools, and family child care homes. Early Education and Development, 20, 507–526. doi:10.1080/10409280902783483.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, B., Kagan, S. L., Loeb, S., & Chang, Y. (2004). Child care quality: Centers and home-based settings that serve poor families. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 505–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gable, S., & Halliburton, A. (2003). Barriers to child care providers’ professional development. Child & Youth Care Forum, 32(3), 175–193. doi:10.1023/A:1023300609394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, E. B., Whitebook, M., & Weinstein, R. S. (2007). At the heart of child care: Predictors of teacher sensitivity in center-based child care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 327–346. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstenblatt, P., Faulkner, M., Travis, D., Lee, A., & Doan, L. T. (2013). Not babysitting: Work stress and well-being for family child care providers. Early Childhood Education Journal: DOI. doi:10.1007/s10643-012-0571-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goelman, H., & Guo, H. (1998). What we know and what we don’t know about burnout among early childhood care providers. Child & Youth Care Forum, 27, 175–199. doi:10.1007/BF02589564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groeneveld, M. G., Vermeer, H. J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Linting, M. (2012). Caregivers’ cortisol levels and perceived stress in home-based and center-based childcare. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 166–175. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halle, T., Nuenning, M., Weinstein, D., Vick, J., Forry, N., & Kinukawa, A. (2009). Primary child care arrangements of U.S. infants: Patterns of utilization by poverty status, family structure, maternal work status and maternal work schedule. Washington, DC: Prepared by Child Trends for the Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

  • Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2004). Self-reported depression in nonfamilial caregivers: Prevalence and associations with caregiver behavior in child-care settings. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, C., & Sanders, K. (2006). Child care for young children. In B. Spodek & O. N. Saracho (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (pp. 85–103). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (IOM) and National Research Council (NRC). (2015). Part IV: Developing the care and education workforce for children birth through age 8. In L. Allen & B. Kelly (Ed.), Transforming the workforce for children birth through age 8: A unifying foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/19401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. D., Ryan, R. M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2012). Child-care subsidies: Do they impact the quality of care children experience? Child Development, 83, 1444–1461. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.1780.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci, T. C. (1980). Convoys across the life course: Attachment, roles and social support. In P. B. Baltes & O. Brim (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 253–268). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, S., & Neuman, S. B. (2009). The impact of professional development in family child care: A practice-based approach. Early Education and Development, 20(3), 537–562. doi:10.1080/10409280902908841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontos, S. (1994). The ecology of family day care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 9, 87–110. doi:10.1016/0885-2006(94)90030-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontos, S., Howes, C., & Galinsky, E. (1996). Does training make a difference to quality in family child care? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11, 427–445. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(96)90016-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontos, S., Howes, C., Shinn, M., & Galinsky, E. (1995). Quality in family child care and relative care. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontos, S., & Riessen, J. (1993). Predictors of job satisfaction, job stress, and job commitment in family day care. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 14, 427–441. doi:10.1016/0193-3973(93)90018-Q.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kryzer, E. M., Kovan, N., Phillips, D. A., Domagall, L. A., & Gunnar, M. R. (2007). Toddlers’ and preschoolers’ experience in family day care: Age differences and behavioral correlates. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 451–466. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.08.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lanigan, J. D. (2011). Family child care providers’ perspectives regarding effective professional development and their role in the child care system: A qualitative study. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38, 399–409. doi:10.1007/s10643-010-0420-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, L. (2013). Who’s minding the kids? Child care arrangements: Spring 2011(Current Population Reports, pp. 70–135). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from: http://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2013/demo/p70-135.pdf

  • Li Grining, C., Raver, C. C., Champion, K., Sardin, L., Metzger, M., & Jones, S. M. (2010). Understanding and improving classroom emotional climate and behavior management in the “real world”: The role of head start teachers’ psychosocial stressors. Early Education and Development, 21, 65–94. doi:10.1080/10409280902783509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, S., Fuller, B., Kagan, S. L., & Carrol, B. (2004). Child care in poor communities: Early learning effects of type, quality, and stability. Child Development, 75, 47–65. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00653.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manlove, E. E. (1993). Multiple correlates of burnout in child care workers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 499–518. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(05)80082-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, D., & Romano-White, D. (1999). Correlates of affectionate and angry behavior in child care educators of preschool-aged children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 14, 155–178. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(99)00007-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molgaard, V. K. (1993). Caregivers’ perceptions of the relationship between the family day care business and their own families. Child & Youth Care Forum, 22, 55–71. doi:10.1007/BF00868991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey, T. W. (2007). Family child care in the United States: Reviews of research literature. New York: Child Care & Early Education Research Connections. Retrieved from Research Connections website: http://www.researchconnections.org/childcare/resources/11683/pdf

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (Version 7.0). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • National Child Care Information and Technical Assistance Center (NCCIC), & National Association for Regulatory Administration (NARA). (2013). The 50 state liscensing study Lexington, KY: NARA. Retrieved from http://www.naralicensing.org/assets/docs/ChildCareLicensingStudies/2011-2013_child%20care%20licensing%20study.pdf

  • National Survey of Early Care and Education Project Team. (2013). Number and characteristics of early care and education (ECE) teachers and caregivers: Initial findings, National Survey of Early Care and Education (NSECE). OPRE Report #2013-38. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/nsece_wf_brief_102913_0.pdf

  • Nelson, M. (1990). Negotiated care: The experiences of family day care providers. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2004). Type of child care and children’s development at 54 months. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 203–230. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D. J. (2001). Quality of care offered by providers with differential patterns of workshop participation. Child & Youth Care Forum, 30, 111–121. doi:10.1023/A:1011633302789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D., McCartney, K., & Sussman, A. (2006). Child care and early development. In K. McCartney & D. Phillips (Eds.), The handbook of early child development (pp. 471–489). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T., Paulsell, D., Del Grosso, P., Avellar, S., Hass, R., & Vuong, L. (2010). A review of the literature on home-based child care: Implications for future directions. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raikes, H. A., Raikes, H. H., & Wilcox, B. (2005). Regulation, subsidy receipt and provider characteristics: What predicts quality in child care homes? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 164–184. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2005.04.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, S,. Genadek, K., Goeken, R., Grover, J., and Sobek, M. (2015). Integrated public use microdata series (Version 6.0) [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota.

  • Rusby, J. C. (2002). Training needs and challenges of family child care providers. Child & Youth Care Forum, 31, 281–293. doi:10.1023/A:1016822526497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E. K., & Abelson, M. J. (2016). Understanding the relationship between instability in child care and instability in employment for families with subsidized care. Journal of Family Issues, 37(3), 344–368. doi:10.1177/0192513X13516763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. P., & Endsley, R. C. (1996). Comparison of accredited and non-accredited family child care programs on program quality, provider professionalism, and family support. Child & Youth Care Forum, 25(6), 353–378. doi:10.1007/BF02589326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, R. A., & McElwain, N. L. (2012). Preservice teachers’ emotion-related regulation and cognition: Associations with teachers’ responses to children’s emotions in early childhood classrooms. Early Education & Development, 23, 202–226. doi:10.1080/10409289.2012.619392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. R., Dunster, L., & Pollard, J. (1999). And this helps me how? Family child care providers discuss training. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 14(3), 285–312. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(99)00020-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornburg, K. R., Townley, K., & Crompton, D. (1998). Competence and burnout in family child care providers. Early Child Development and Care, 141, 61–71. doi:10.1080/0300443981410105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, C. M., & Deery-Schmitt, D. (1996). Factors affecting turnover among family child care providers: A longitudinal study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11(3), 351–376. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(96)90012-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuominen, M. (2003). We are not babysitters: Family care providers redefine work and care. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Child Care. (2015) Characteristics of Families Served by Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Based on preliminary FY 2014 Data Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/occ/resource/characteristics-of-families-served-by-child-care-and-development-fund-ccdf

  • Vandell, D. L. (1996). Characteristics of infant child care: Factors contributing to positive care: NICHD early child care research network. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11(3), 269–306. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(96)90009-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. (2002). Predictors of family child care providers’ intentions toward professional development. Child & Youth Care Forum, 31(4), 233–255. doi:10.1023/A:1016357525548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. H. (2002). Predictors of quality and commitment in family child care: Provider education, personal resources, and support. Early Education and Development, 13, 265–282. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed1303_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, A. R., Farber, J. W., Swartz, R. A., & King, S. (2011). Illinois Department of Human Services Salary and Staffing Survey of Licensed Child Care Facilities. Illinois Department of Human Services. Retrieved from: http://www.dhs.state.il.us/OneNetLibrary/27897/documents/HCD%20Reports/Child%20Care/2011-SalaryStaffingFINAL.pdf

  • Child Care & Early Education Research Connections. (n.d.). Child care & early education glossary. Retrieved from http://www.researchconnections.org/childcare/childcare-glossary

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Child Care Research Scholars Grant Program of the Administration for Children and Families Office of Planning and Evaluation Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, grant number 90YE0135. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. We also thank the Illinois Department of Human Services Bureau of Child Care and Development, the Illinois Network of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies, and the Child Care Resource Service/Child Care Resilience Program at the University of Illinois for their support of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

    Rebecca Anne Swartz, Angela R. Wiley & Katherine A. Magerko

  2. Nebraska Center for Research on Children, Youth, Families and Schools, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA

    Natalie A. Koziol

Authors
  1. Rebecca Anne Swartz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angela R. Wiley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Natalie A. Koziol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Katherine A. Magerko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Anne Swartz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Swartz, R.A., Wiley, A.R., A. Koziol, N. et al. Psychosocial Influences Upon the Workforce and Professional Development Participation of Family Child Care Providers. Child Youth Care Forum 45, 781–805 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-016-9353-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-016-9353-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation