Child & Youth Care Forum

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 671–686 | Cite as

The Role of Transport Use in Adolescent Wilderness Treatment: Its Relationship to Readiness to Change and Outcomes

  • Anita R. Tucker
  • Joanna E. Bettmann
  • Christine L. Norton
  • Casey Comart
Original Paper

Abstract

Background

Considering the sensitive ethical issues related to involuntary treatment of adolescents, research investigating youth transport practices and treatment outcomes is clearly needed. Youth transport is common practice in many private pay programs, including wilderness therapy programs.

Objective

This study of 350 adolescents in wilderness therapy sought to answer the following questions: (1) did youth who were transported to wilderness therapy present differently at intake than youth not transported in terms of both readiness to change and functioning? (2) Were there different outcomes for participants who were transported to the program compared to those who were not? (3) Were transport use and readiness to change predictors of overall improvement in the program?

Methods

In this exploratory non-equivalent groups quasi-experimental study, youth self-report pre- and post- mean scores of the YOQ and URICA, as well as parent YOQ reports, were compared between transported and non-transported groups. Regression analyses were performed to see if transport use was predictive of overall improvement.

Findings

Results suggested that youth improved significantly regardless of transport use; however, transported youth were more likely to have larger decreases in mental health symptomatology than non-transported youth, suggesting that being transported did not have a negative impact on treatment outcomes.

Discussion

While these are encouraging findings, the results represent the evaluation of a single wilderness therapy program and are limited by the research design; hence, future research is needed to increase confidence that transport does not negatively affect treatment effectiveness.

Keywords

Adolescent treatment Wilderness therapy Outdoor behavioral healthcare Transport Readiness to change 

References

  1. Allen, J., & Wilson, V. (Eds.). (2003). Assessing alcohol problems: A guide for clinicians and researchers (2nd ed.). Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct including 2010 amendments: General principles. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx?item=3
  3. Arbuckle, M., & Herrick, C. A. (Eds.). (2006). Child and adolescent mental health: Interdisciplinary systems of care. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Association of Mediation & Transport Services (AMTS). (2013). Ten important questions to ask when considering a transport/intervention company. Retrieved from http://www.amats.org/resources.html
  5. Bastien, R. T., & Adelman, H. S. (1984). Noncompulsory versus legally mandated placement, perceived choice, and response to treatment among adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 171–179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, S. P. (2010). Wilderness therapy: Ethical considerations for mental health professionals. Child and Youth Care Forum, 39, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bettmann, J., Olson-Morrison, D., & Jasperson, R. (2011). Adolescents in wilderness therapy: A qualitative study of attachment relationships. Journal of Experiential Education, 34, 176–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bettmann, J. E., Russell, K. C., & Parry, K. J. (2013). How substance abuse recovery skills, readiness to change and symptom reduction impact change processes in wilderness therapy participants. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 1039–1050. doi:10.1007/s10826-012-9665-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bettmann, J., & Tucker, A. (2011). Shifts in attachment relationship: A study of adolescents in wilderness treatment. Child and Youth Care Forum, 40, 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brener, N., Billy, J., & Grady, W. (2003). Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: Evidence from the scientific literature. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 436–457.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Burlingame, G. M., Wells, M. G., Cox, J. C., Lambert, M. J., Latkowski, M., & Justice, D. (2005). Administration and scoring manual for the Y-OQ. Wharton, NJ: American Professional Credentialing Service.Google Scholar
  12. CAFETY. (2011). Points of advocacy: Examining the issues of concern surrounding residential programs for youth. Washington, D.C.: Community Alliance for the Ethical Treatment of Youth.Google Scholar
  13. Garland, A. F., Lewczyk, C. M., Gabayan, E., & Hawley, K. M. (2004). Multiple stakeholder agreement on desired outcomes for adolescents’ mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 55, 671–676.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenstein, D., Franklin, M., & McGuffin, P. (1999). Measuring motivation to change: An examination of the University of Rhode Island change assessment questionnaire (URICA) in an adolescent sample. Psychotherapy, 1, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hardy, C. (2011). Adolescent treatment coercion. Journal of Therapeutic Schools and Programs, 5, 88–95.Google Scholar
  16. Hartford, R. J., Ungerer, J. C., & Kinsella, J. K. (1976). Effects of legal pressure on prognosis for treatment of drug dependence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 133, 1399–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hawley, K. M., & Weisz, J. R. (2003). Child, parent, and therapist (dis)agreement on target problems in outpatient therapy: The therapist’s dilemma and its implications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 62–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Huffine, C. (2006). On coercive treatment of adolescents. Retrieved from http://cafety.org/on-coercion/145-on-coercive-treatment-of-adolescents-charles-huffine-md
  19. Hummer, V. L., Dollard, N., Robst, J., & Armstrong, M. I. (2010). Innovations in implementation of trauma-informed care practices in youth residential treatment: A curriculum for organizational change. Child Welfare, 89, 79–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Illinois Children’s Mental Health Partnership. (2014). Residential treatment for youth with mental health needs: A guide for parents. Retrieved from http://www.isbe.state.il.us/pdf/school_health/mh-res-trtmnt-hdbk01-12.pdf#page=45&zoom=auto,-265,550
  21. Independent Educational Consultants Association. (2013). Helping clients with therapeutic needs. Retrieved from http://www.iecaonline.com/atrisk.html
  22. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaltiala-Heino, R. (2010). Involuntary commitment and detainment in adolescent psychiatric inpatient care. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45, 785–793.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lewis, S. F. (2013). Examining changes in substance use and conduct problems among treatment-seeking adolescents. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 18, 33–38. doi:10.1111/j.1475-3588.2012.00657.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Menninger, J. A. (2001). Involuntary treatment: Hospitalization and medications. In J. Jacobson & A. Jacobson (Eds.), Psychiatric Secrets (2nd ed., pp. 477–484). Philadelphia, PA: Hanley & Belfus.Google Scholar
  26. Molnar, B. E. (1997). Juveniles and psychiatric institutionalization: Toward better due process and treatment review in the United States. Health and Human Rights, 2(2), 99–116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. National Alliance on Mental Illness. (2010). Facts on children’s mental health in America. Retrieved from http://www.nami.org/Template.cfm?Section=federal_and_state_policy_legislation&template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=43804
  28. National Association of Social Workers. (2006). Code of ethics. Retrieved from http://www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/code.asp
  29. National Association of Therapeutic Schools and Programs. (2014). NATSAP 2013-2014 online member director. Retrieved from http://www.natsap.org/assets/docs/1314Directory/2013-2014%20natsap%20online%20directory%2004.23.14.pdf
  30. National Institute for Mental Health. (2005). Mental illness exacts heavy toll, beginning in youth. Retrieved from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/science-news/2005/mental-illness-exacts-heavy-toll-beginning-in-youth.shtml
  31. Nijhof, K. S., Veerman, J. W., Engels, R., & Scholte, R. (2011). Compulsory residential care: An examination of treatment improvement of individual and family functioning. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 1779–1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Outdoor Behavioral Healthcare Council. (2013). About us. Retrieved from https://www.obhic.com/about/
  33. RedCliff Ascent. (2012). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from http://www.redcliffascent.com/faq/
  34. Russell, K. C. (2003). An assessment of outcomes in outdoor behavioral healthcare treatment. Child and Youth Care Forum, 32, 355–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Russell, K. C. (2005). Two years later: A qualitative assessment of youth wellbeing and he role of aftercare in outdoor behavioral healthcare treatment. Child and Youth Care Forum, 34, 209–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Russell, K., Gillis, H. L., & Lewis, T. G. (2008). A five-year follow up of a survey of North American Outdoor Behavioral Healthcare programs. The Journal for Experiential Education, 31(1), 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Safe and Sound Youth Transportation, Inc. (2015). Staff training. Retrieved from http://www.safeandsoundtransportation.com/index.php/staff
  38. Schmidt, R. (1996). Who are you to say what my best interest is? Minors’ due process rights when admitted by parents for inpatient mental health treatment. Washington Law Review, 71(4), 1187–1217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Snyder, C., & Anderson, S. (2009). An examination of mandated versus voluntary referral as a determinant of clinical outcome. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 35, 278–292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tucker, A., Zelov, R., & Young, M. (2011). Four years along: Emerging traits of programs in the NATSAP practice research network (PRN). Journal of Therapeutic Schools and Programs, 5, 10–28.Google Scholar
  41. Wagner, K. D., Weinstein, S. R., & Wagner, R. F. (1990). Therapeutic alliance and involuntary commitment of a minor. Jefferson Journal of Psychiatry, 8, 3–8.Google Scholar
  42. Wells, M. G., Burlingame, G. M., & Rose, P. (2003). Manual for the youth outcome questionnaire self-report. Wharton, NJ: American Professional Credentialing Service.Google Scholar
  43. Zelov, R., Tucker, A. R., & Javorksi, S. (2013). A new phase for the NATSAP PRN: Post discharge reporting and transition to the network wide utilization of the Y-OQ 2.0. Journal of Therapeutic Schools and Programs, 6, 7–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anita R. Tucker
    • 1
  • Joanna E. Bettmann
    • 2
  • Christine L. Norton
    • 3
  • Casey Comart
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Social WorkThe University of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  2. 2.College of Social WorkThe University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  3. 3.School of Social WorkTexas State University – San MarcosSan MarcosUSA
  4. 4.Outdoor Education Program, Department of Social WorkThe University of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations