Child & Youth Care Forum

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 465–479 | Cite as

Models to Guide System Reform for At-Risk Youth

  • Susan A. McCarterEmail author
  • Mason G. Haber
  • Donna Kazemi
Original Paper


Policy reform for at-risk youth is complicated by involvement of various service sectors. Issues related to coordinating systems of care in a dynamic policy environment are not new, but surprisingly little has been written to guide practitioners and policymakers in addressing them (Friedman in Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 11:11–18, 2003). To that end, a social worker, community psychologist, and nurse, working as part of a multidisciplinary team reviewed the practice literature on models to guide policy reform in justice and behavioral health systems. Five models are presented to assist community practitioners assessing similar policy reform.


At-risk youth Juvenile justice Behavioral health Policy reform 


  1. American Psychological Association. (2004). Amicus curiae brief filed in U.S. Supreme Court in Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005). Retrieved December 6, 2009, from
  2. Behar, L. (1986). Services for families. Children Today, 15 (3).Google Scholar
  3. Birckhead, T. R. (2008). North Carolina juvenile court jurisdiction and the resistance to reform. North Carolina Law Review, 86, 1443–1500.Google Scholar
  4. Burchard, J. D., Bruns, E. J., & Burchard, S. N. (2002). The wraparound approach. In B. J. Burns & K. Hoagwood (Eds.), Community treatment for youth: Evidence-based interventions for severe emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 69–90). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Burns, B. J., & Goldman, S. K. (Eds.). (1999). Promising practices in wraparound for children with serious emotional disturbance and their families. Systems of Care: Promising practices in children’s mental health, 1998 Series, Vol. IV. Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, E., Adams, N., Dougherty, R., Clark, J. D., & Taylor, S. (2007). The intersection of transformation and quality in mental health treatment. International Journal of Mental Health, 36, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook, J. R., & Kilmer, R. P. (2004). Evaluating systems of care: Missing links in children’s mental health research. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 655–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costello, E. J., Pescosolido, B. A., Angold, A., & Burns, B. J. (1998). A family network-based model of access to child mental health services. Research in Community Mental Health, 9, 165–190.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, M., Green, M., & Hoffman, C. (2009). The service system obstacle course for transition-age youth and young adults. In H. B. Clark & D. Unruh (Eds.), Transition of youth and young adults with emotional or behavioral difficulties: An evidence-supported handbook (pp. 1–33). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
  10. Downey, L. H., Anyaegbunam, C., & Scutchfield, D. (2009). Dialogue to deliberation: Expanding the empowerment education model. American Journal of Health Behavior, 33, 26–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Duchnowski, A. J., Hall, K. S., Kutash, K., & Friedman, R. M. (1998). The alternatives to residential treatment study. In M. H. Epstein, K. Kutash, & A. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with behavioral and emotional disorders and their families: Programs and evaluation best practices. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  12. Dunst, C. J., Johanson, C., Trivette, C. M., & Hamby, D. (1991). Family-oriented intervention policies and practices: Family-centered or not? Exceptional Children, 58, 115–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., Starnes, A. L., Hamby, D. W., & Gordon, N. J. (1993). Building and evaluating family support initiatives: A national study of programs for persons with developmental disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
  14. Elmore, R. F. (1987). Instruments and strategy in public policy. Policy Studies Review, 7, 174–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).Google Scholar
  16. Friedman, D. (2003). A conceptual framework for developing and implementing effective policy in children’s mental health. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilliam, F. R., & Bales, S. N. (2001). Strategic framing analysis: Reframing America’s Youth. Social Policy Report, 15, 1–15.Google Scholar
  18. Grisso, T. (2004). Double jeopardy: Adolescent offenders with mental disorders. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Israel, B. A., Eng, E., Schulz, A. J., & Parker, E. A. (Eds.). (2005). Methods in community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  20. Langley, G., Nolan, K., Nolan, T., Norman, C., & Provost, L. (1996). The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Lasker, R. D., & Guidry, J. A. (2009). Engaging the community in decision making: Case studies tracking participation, voice and influence. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.Google Scholar
  22. May, P. J., & Burby, R. J. (1996). Coercive versus cooperative policies: Comparing intergovernmental mandate performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15, 171–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (Eds.). (1981). Effective policy implementation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  24. Nissen, L. B. (2007). Reclaiming futures: Communities helping teens overcome drugs, alcohol, and crime–A new practice framework for juvenile justice. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 39, 51–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nissen, L. B., Butts, J. A., Merrigan, D., & Kraft, M. K. (2006). The RWJF reclaiming futures initiative: Improving interventions for justice-involved youth. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 57, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scott, E. S., & Steinberg, L. (2008). Rethinking juvenile justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Roper v. Simmons, (2005) 543 U.S. 551.Google Scholar
  28. Stiffman, A. R., Foster, K., Hamburg, K., & Dore, P. (2003a). IMPROVE: A software program to improve assessments and multisector referrals. Tampa, FL: Paper presentation at the Annual Research Conference of the Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health.Google Scholar
  29. Stiffman, A. R., Pescosolido, B., & Cabassa, L. J. (2004). Building a model to understand youth service access: The gateway provider model. Mental Health Services Research, 6, 189–198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Stiffman, A. R., Striley, C. W., Brown, E., Limb, G., & Ostmann, E. (2003b). American Indian youth: Southwestern urban and reservation youth’s need for services and whom they turn to for help. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12, 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stiffman, A. R., Striley, C. W., Horvath, V., Hadley-Ives, E., Polgar, M., Elze, D., et al. (2001). Organizational context and provider perception as determinants of mental health service use. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 28, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stroul, B. A., & Friedman, R. M. (1986). A system of care for severely emotionally disturbed children and adolescents. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center, National Technical Assistance Center for Child Mental Health.Google Scholar
  33. VanDenBerg, J. E., & Grealish, E. M. (1996). Individualized services and supports through the wraparound process: Philosophy and procedures. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan A. McCarter
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mason G. Haber
    • 2
  • Donna Kazemi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Social WorkUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteCharlotteUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteCharlotteUSA
  3. 3.School of NursingUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations