Abstract
A response to the comment on our work “Preparation and Characterization of Ce/N-Codoped TiO2 Particles for Production of H2 by Photocatalytic Splitting Water Under Visible Light” presented by Ernesto Paparazzo has been made, in which we agree with the points about the XPS analysis and interpretation of Ce3d spectra. Based on these points, we have corrected the section on XPS analysis in our paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sun X, Liu H, Dong J, Wei J, Zhang Y (2010) Catal Lett 135:219
Kotani A, Ogasawara H (1992) J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 60:257
Ingo GM, Paparazzo E, Bagnarelli O, Zacchetti N (1990) Surf Interface Anal 16:515
Shyu JZ, Otto K, Watkins WLH, Graham GW, Belitz RK, Gandhi HS (1988) J Catal 114:23
Romeo M, Bak K, El-Fallah J, Le Normand F, Hilaire L (1993) Surf Interface Anal 20:508
Barr TL, Modern ESCA (1994) The principles and practice of X-ray photoelectron rev spectroscopy. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 47–48
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, X., Liu, H. Response to the Comments by Ernesto Paparazzo. Catal Lett 140, 151–152 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-010-0473-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-010-0473-2