Skip to main content
Log in

Nature of Proline-induced Enantiodifferentiation in Asymmetric Pd Catalyzed Hydrogenations: Is the Catalyst Really Indifferent?

  • Published:
Catalysis Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mode of enantioselection in the proline modified asymmetric hydrogenation of isophorone (3,5,5-trimethyl-2-cyclohexenone) on supported Pd catalysts has been studied. It is shown that several experimental factors, such as modifier structure and chemical nature of the catalyst support, strongly affect the outcome of the hydrogenations. Secondary kinetic resolution was found to be the major reason for obtaining high enantioselectivities on most catalysts. Extensive studies have been carried out to clarify the importance of the interaction of the proline–dihydroisophorone complex with the catalyst. The secondary kinetic resolution of dihydroisophorone was investigated under different conditions. First, racemic-dihydroisophorone was studied using several (S)-proline modified supported Pd catalysts, then the individual enantiomers were subjected to a similar reaction on Pd/BaCO3 catalyst in the presence of (S)-proline. Our results provide convincing support for the heterogeneous enantioselection model under the current experimental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1
Fig. 1
Scheme 2
Scheme 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sheldon RA (1993) Chirotechnology: industrial synthesis of optically active compounds. Marcel Dekker, New York; Jacobsen EN, Pfaltz A, Yamamoto H (eds) (1999) Comprehensive asymmetric catalysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

  2. Augustine RL (1996) Heterogeneous catalysis for the synthetic chemist. Marcel Dekker, New York; Bartók M, Molnár Á (1997) Heterogeneous catalytic hydrogenation, In: Patai S (ed) Chemistry of functional groups, Suppl. A3, Chap 16. Wiley, Chichester, p 843; Smith GV, Notheisz F (1999) Heterogeneous catalysis in organic chemistry. Academic Press, San Diego; Consiglio G (2003) In: Horváth IT, (ed), Encyclopedia of catalysis, vol 1. Wiley, New York, p 407; Klabunovski E, Smith GV, Zsigmond Á (2006) Heterogeneous enantioselective hydrogenations—theory and practice, catalysis by metal complexes, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht

  3. Baiker A, Blaser H-U (1997) In: Ertl G, Knözinger H, Weitkamp J (eds) Handbook of heterogeneous catalysis, vol 5. Wiley-VCH, New York-Weinheim, p 2422; Mallat T, Baiker A (2000) Appl Catal A 200:3; Baiker A (2000) J Mol Catal A 163:205; Studer M, Blaser H-U, Exner C (2003) Adv Synth Catal 345:45; Bürgi T, Baiker A (2004) Acc Chem Res 37:909; Bartek L, Kluson P, Cerveny L (2005) Chem Listy 99:157; Baiker A (2005) Catal Today 100:159; Bartók M (2006) Curr Org Chem 10:1533

  4. Osawa T, Harada T, Tai A (1997) Catal Today 37:465; Sugimura T (1999) Catal Surv Jpn 3:37; Osawa T, Harada T, Takayau O (2000) Top Catal 13:155

  5. Török B, Felföldi K, Szakonyi G, Balázsik K, Bartók M (1999) Catal Lett 52:81; Zuo X, Liu H, Gou D, Yang X (1999) Tetrahedron 55:7787; Török B, Felföldi K, Balázsik K, Bartók M (1999) Chem Commun 1725; Studer M, Bukhardt S, Blaser H-U (1999) Chem Commun 1727; Leblond C, Wang J, Liu J, Andrews T, Sun Y (1999) J Am Chem Soc 121:4920; Török B, Balázsik K, Szöllösi G, Felföldi K, Bartók M (1999) Chirality 11:470; Balázsik K, Szőri K, Felföldi K, Török B, Bartók M (2000) Chem Commun 555; Studer M, Burkhardt S, Indolese AF, Blaser H-U (2000) Chem Commun 1327; von Arx M, Mallat T, Baiker A (2001) Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 40:2302; Sutyinszki M, Szőri K, Felföldi K, Bartók M (2002) Catal Commun 3:125; Blaser H-U, Burkhardt S, Kirner HJ, Massner T, Studer M (2003) Synthesis 1679; Marinas A, Mallat T, Baiker A (2004) J Catal 221:666

  6. Vetere V, Faraoni MB, Santori GF, Podesta J, Casella ML, Ferretti OA (2004) J Catal 226:457; Hutchings GJ (2005) Ann Rev Mat Res 35:143; Lavoie S, Laliberte MA, Temprano I, McBreen PH (2006) J Am Chem Soc 128:7588; Murzin DY, Toukoniitty E (2006) Catal Lett 109:125; Diezi S, Reimann S, Bonalumi N, Mallat T, Baiker A (2006) J Catal 239:255; Diezi S, Ferri D, Vargas A, Mallat T, Baiker A (2006) J Am Chem Soc 128:4048

  7. Borszéky K, Mallat T, Baiker A (1997) Tetrahedron: Asymm 8:3745; Kun I, Török B, Felföldi K, Bartók M (2000) Appl Catal A: Gen 203:71; Nitta Y, Kubota T, Okamoto Y (2004) J Mol Catal A 212:155; Szöllösi G, Hanaoka T, Niwa S, Mizukami F, Bartók M (2005) J Catal 231:480

  8. Huck WR, Mallat T, Baiker A (2002) Catal Lett 80:87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mallat T, Orglmeister E, Baiker A (2007) Chem Rev 107:4863; Studer M, Blaser H-U (2007) Acc Chem Res 40:1348

  10. List B (2002) Tetrahedron 58:5573; Dalko PI, Moissan L (2001) Angew Chem Int Ed 40:3726

  11. Tungler A, Sípos É, Háda É (2006) Curr Org Chem 10:1569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tungler A, Máthé T, Petró J, Tarnai T(1990) J Mol Catal 61:259; Sípos É, Tungler A, Bitter I (2003) J Mol Catal A 198:167; Sípos É, Tungler A (2003) React Kinet Catal Lett 80:365; Tungler A (2001) React Kinet Catal Lett 74:271; Sípos É, Tungler A, Bitter I, Kubinyi M (2002) J Mol Catal A 186:187; Sípos É, Fogassy G, Tungler A, Sament PV, Figueiredo JL (2004) J Mol Catal A 212:245; Sípos É, Tungler A, Fogassy G (2004) J Mol Catal A 216:171

  13. Mhadgut SC, Bucsi I, Török M, Török B (2004) Chem Commun 984

  14. Mhadgut SC, Török M, Esquibel J, Török B (2006) J Catal 238:441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. One of the reviewers raised concerns regarding our statement that our group suggested (published) first the paramount importance of kinetic resolution in this reaction. To support our statement, here, we list the relevant publication data: Mhadgut et al. (2006) J Catal (see [14] above): submitted: October 25, 2005; accepted: January 05, 2006; published: February 07, 2006 (online) March 10, 2006 (hardcopy). McIntosh et al. (2006) J Am Chem Soc (see [16] below): submitted February 15, 2006; accepted: date is not available; published: May 12, 2006 (online) June 07, 2006 (hardcopy)

  16. McIntosh AI, Watson DJ, Burton JW, Lambert RM (2006) J Am Chem Soc 128:7329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhan E, Li S, Xu Y, Shen W, Catal. Commun. 8 (2007) 1239; Li S, Zhan E, Li Y, Xu Y, Shen W (2008) Catal Today ASAP article DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.10.04/

  18. Török B, Felföldi K, Szakonyi G, Bartók M (1997) Ultrasonics Sonochem 4:301; Török B, Balázsik K, Török M, Felföldi K, Bartók M (2002) Catal Lett 81:55

  19. Chambers A, Jackson SD, Stirling D, Webb G (1997) J Catal 168:301; Szöllösi G, Török B, Baranyi L, Bartók M (1998) J Catal 179:619; Margitfalvi JL, Borbáth I, Hegedűs M, Tompos A (2002) Appl Catal A 229:35; Török B, Prakash GKS (2003) Adv Synth Catal 345:165; Landge SM, Schmidt A, Outerbridge V, Török B (2007) Synlett 1600

  20. Joucla M, Mortier J (1988) Bull Chim Soc France 3:579

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support provided by the ACS-Petroleum Research Fund, University of Massachusetts Boston and Michigan Technological University is highly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Béla Török.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mhadgut, S.C., Török, M., Dasgupta, S. et al. Nature of Proline-induced Enantiodifferentiation in Asymmetric Pd Catalyzed Hydrogenations: Is the Catalyst Really Indifferent?. Catal Lett 123, 156–163 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-008-9411-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-008-9411-y

Keywords

Navigation