Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contrasting the Behaviour of MoO3 and MoO2 for the Oxidation of Methanol

  • Published:
Catalysis Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The oxidation of methanol has been measured on MoO3 and MoO2. The properties of these two materials are interchangeable, depending upon the conditions in which the reaction is run. MoO3 produces high yields of formaldehyde, but MoO2 does not, due to the importance of the Mo6+ state for the selective reaction. However, if the MoO3 material is run in anaerobic conditions it behaves in a very similar way to MoO2, due to the presence of Mo4+ in the surface layers. In complement to this MoO2 converts to high yield behaviour when run in aerobic conditions, due to the conversion of the material to Mo6+ at the surface, and, ultimately to MoO3 in the bulk. In TPD experiments MoO3 yields formaldehyde, whereas MoO2 yields CO. In both materials oxygen transport within the lattice becomes appreciable above 300 °C, and the reaction proceeds via the Mars-van Krevelen mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soares A, Portela M, Kiennemann A (2004) Catal Rev 47:125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Niwa M, Mizutani M, Takahashi M, Murukami Y (1981) J Catal 70:14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Popov B, Pashis A, Shuratova L (1986) Catal Lett 30:129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Soares A, Portela M, Kienneman A, Hilaire L (2003) Chem Eng Sci 58:1315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Briand LE, Hirt AM, Wachs IE (2001) Catal J 202:268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ressler T, Wienold J, Jentoft R, Girgsdies F (2003) Eur J Inorg Chem 2:301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guidot J, Germain JE (1980) React Kin Catal Lett 15:389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith RL, Rohrer GS (1998) J Catal 173:219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bertinchamps F, Gaigneaux EM (2004) Catal Today 91–92:105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ressler T, Jentoff R, Wienold J, Guenter M, Timpe O (2000) J Phys Chem B 104:6360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ressler T, Wienold J, Jentoft R, Neisius T (2002) J Catal 210:67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Law D, Bowker M (1991) Catal Today 10:397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. JCPDS Card Number 35–609

  14. Farneth WE, McCarron E III, Sleight AW, Staley R (1987) Langmuir 3:217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Farneth WE, Ohuchi F, Staley R, Chowdhry U, Sleight AW (1985) J Phys Chem 89:2493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bowker M, Holroyd R, Elliott A, Alouche A, Entwistle C, Toerncrona A (2002) Catal Lett 83:165–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. JCPDS Card Number 32–671

  18. Arruano J, Wanke S (1975) Can J Chem Eng 53:301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pernicone N, Lazzerin F, Liberti G, Lanzavecchia G (1969) J Catal 14:239

    Google Scholar 

  20. McCarron E III, Harlow R, Li I, Suto C, Yuen Y (1998) J Sol State Chem 136:247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Holstein W, Machiels C (1996) Catal J 162:118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Burcham L, Briand L, Wachs IE (2001) Langmuir 17:6175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McCarron EM III, Staley R, Sleight AW (1984) Inorg Chem 23:1043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to EPSRC and Perstorp for support for a studentship to MH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK

    Michael Bowker, Albert F. Carley & Matthew House

Authors
  1. Michael Bowker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Albert F. Carley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew House
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Bowker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bowker, M., Carley, A.F. & House, M. Contrasting the Behaviour of MoO3 and MoO2 for the Oxidation of Methanol. Catal Lett 120, 34–39 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-007-9255-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-007-9255-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation