Abstract
Decellularized arteries have been considered as promising scaffolds for small-diameter vascular substitutes. However, weakened mechanical properties, immunological rejection and rapid degradation after transplantation still exist after decellularization. Previous studies indicated that genipin cross-linking can solve these problems. Therefore, genipin was selected as the cross-linking agent for the pre-treatment of decellularized arteries in our study. Histological analysis, scanning electron microscopy, mechanical properties analysis and subcutaneous embedding experiment were adopted to investigate the efficiency of decellularization and the effect of genipin cross-linking on improving mechanical, structural and biological properties of decellularized arteries. Decellularization protocols based on three trypsin concentrations were used to prepare decellularized arteries, after decellularization, arteries were cross-linked with genipin. Results showed that 0.5% trypsin was the most efficient concentration to remove cellular components and preserve ECM. However, mechanical properties of 0.5% trypsin decellularized arteries weakened significantly, while genipin cross-linking improved mechanical properties of decellularized arteries to the same level as fresh arteries. After 4 weeks subcutaneous embedding, cross-linked arteries caused the mildest inflammatory response. In conclusion, genipin could be employed as an ideal cross-linking agent to strengthen mechanical properties, enhance the resistance to degradation and reduce the antigenicity of decellularized arteries for small-diameter blood vessel tissue engineering applications.





References
Alexandar V, Nayar PG, Murugesan R, Mary B, Darshana P, Ahmed SS (2015) CardioGenBase: a literature based multi-omics database for major cardiovascular diseases. PLoS ONE 10(12):e0143188
Badylak SF, Freytes DO, Gilbert TW (2009) Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: structure and function. Acta Biomater 5(1):1–13
Bennion RS, Williams RA, Stabile BE, Fox MA, Owens ML, Wilson SE (1985) Patency of autogenous saphenous vein versus polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in femoropopliteal bypass for advanced ischemia of the extremity. Surg Gynecol Obstet 160(3):239–242
Bhrany AD, Lien CJ, Beckstead BL et al (2008) Crosslinking of an oesophagus acellular matrix tissue scaffold. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2(6):365–372
Crapo PM, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF (2011) An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials 32(12):3233–3243
Gilbert TW, Sellaro TL, Badylak SF (2006) Decellularization of tissues and organs. Biomaterials 27(19):3675–3683
Grandi C, Baiguera S, Martorina F et al (2011) Decellularized bovine reinforced vessels for small-diameter tissue-engineered vascular grafts. Int J Mol Med 28(3):315–325
Ishino N, Fujisato T (2015) Decellularization of porcine carotid by the recipient’s serum and evaluation of its biocompatibility using a rat autograft model. J Artif Organs 18(2):136–142
Khor E (1997) Methods for the treatment of collagenous tissues for bioprostheses. Biomaterials 18(2):95–105
Koch H, Graneist C, Emmrich F, et al (2012) Xenogenic esophagus scaffolds fixed with several agents: comparative in vivo study of rejection and inflammation. J Biomed Biotechnol 948320
Madhavan K, Belchenko D, Motta A, Tan W (2010) Evaluation of composition and crosslinking effects on collagen-based composite constructs. Acta Biomater 6(4):1413–1422
McBane JE, Sharifpoor S, Labow RS, Ruel M, Suuronen EJ, Santerre JP (2012) Tissue engineering a small diameter vessel substitute: engineering constructs with select biomaterials and cells. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 10(3):347–360
Raines EW (2000) The extracellular matrix can regulate vascular cell migration, proliferation, and survival: relationships to vascular disease. Int J Exp Pathol 81(3):173–182
Rashid ST, Fuller B, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM (2008) Tissue engineering of a hybrid bypass graft for coronary and lower limb bypass surgery. Faseb J 22(6):2084–2089
Schenke-Layland K, Vasilevski O, Opitz F et al (2003) Impact of decellularization of xenogeneic tissue on extracellular matrix integrity for tissue engineering of heart valves. J Struct Biol 143(3):201–208
Schmidt CE, Baier JM (2000) Acellular vascular tissues: natural biomaterials for tissue repair and tissue engineering. Biomaterials 21(22):2215–2231
Wang X, Gu Z, Qin H, Li L, Yang X, Yu X (2015) Crosslinking effect of dialdehyde starch (DAS) on decellularized porcine aortas for tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 79:813–821
Weinberg CB, Bell E (1986) A blood vessel model constructed from collagen and cultured vascular cells. Science 231(4736):397–400
Wu YF, He FL, Gu YQ et al (2015) Evaluation in vivo of autologous cell derived vein grafts based on tissue engineering concept. Int Angiol 34(5):495–501
Xu XF, Guo HP, Ren XJ et al (2014) Effect of carbodiimide cross-linking of decellularized porcine pulmonary artery valvular leaflets. Int J Clin Exp Med 7(3):649–656
Yang M, Chen CZ, Wang XN, Zhu YB, Gu YJ (2009) Favorable effects of the detergent and enzyme extraction method for preparing decellularized bovine pericardium scaffold for tissue engineered heart valves. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 91(1):354–361
Zhang X, Chen X, Yang T et al (2014) The effects of different crossing-linking conditions of genipin on type I collagen scaffolds: an in vitro evaluation. Cell Tissue Bank 15(4):531–541
Zou Y, Zhang Y (2012) Mechanical evaluation of decellularized porcine thoracic aorta. J Surg Res 175(2):359–368
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFC1104100) and the Capital Health Research and Development of Special, Beijing, China (No. 2016-1-2012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gu, Y., Wang, F., Wang, R. et al. Preparation and evaluation of decellularized porcine carotid arteries cross-linked by genipin: the preliminary results. Cell Tissue Bank 19, 311–321 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-017-9675-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-017-9675-9