Skip to main content

Table 1 Results obtained using multiple 10 Strs detection method

From: Cell lines authentication and mycoplasma detection as minimun quality control of cell lines in biobanking

Samples Analized STRs
AMEL CSF1PO D13S317 D16S539 D21S11 D5S818 D7S820 TH01 TPOX VWA
A X 11, 12 10, 11 8, 9 28, 32.2 11, 13 10, 12 5, 6 9, 12 13, 15
A′ X 11, 13 10, 11 8, 9 28, 32.2 11, 13 10, 12 5, 6 9, 12 13, 15
B X 10, 12 8, 11 10, 13 29.2, 33.2 11, 12 8, 12 7, 9 8, 11 16, 18
B′ X 10, 12 8, 11 10, 13 29.2, 33.2 11, 12 8, 12 7, 9 8, 11 16, 18
C X 10, 11 9, 11 8, 10 29, 33.2 11, 12 10, 11 6, 9 8, 11 14, 15
C′ X 10, 12 9, 11 8, 10 29, 33.2 11, 12 10, 11 6, 9 8, 11 14, 15
D X 11, 12 9, 13 9, 10 29 14, 16 9, 12 6, 10 8, 12 16
D′ X 11, 13 9, 13 9, 10 29 14, 16 9, 12 6, 10 8, 12 16
E X 12 11, 12 9, 13 31.2, 32.2 10, 12 10, 11 6, 8 8, 10 18
E′ X 12 11, 12 9, 13 31.2, 32.2 10, 12 10, 11 6, 8 8, 10 18
F X 11, 12 8, 13 10, 11 29, 30 11 9, 11 7, 9 8, 10 18
F′ X 11, 12 8, 13 10, 11 29, 30 11 9, 11 7, 9 8, 10 18
G X 11, 12 12 11 29, 30 11 9 6, 9 8, 12 15, 18
G′ X 11, 12 12 11 29, 30 11 9 6, 9 8, 12 15, 18
H X, Y 10, 12 12 12, 13 29, 30 10, 12 10 7 7, 8 16, 18
H′ X, Y 10, 12 12 12, 13 29, 30 10, 12 10 7 7, 8 16, 18
I X 10, 14 12 9, 11 27, 28 11, 12 8, 9 9 11 15, 17
I′ X 10, 14 12 9, 11 27, 28 11, 12 8, 9 9 11 15, 17
J X, Y 10 12, 13 8, 14 32.2 9, 12 10, 12 9, 9.3 11 15
J′ X, Y 10 12, 13 8, 14 32.2 9, 12 10, 12 9, 9.3 11 15
  1. Four cell lines were compared with the original tissue (A and A′, B and B′, C and C′, D and D′), 3 cell lines were compared with frozen blood from the original donor (E and E′, F and F′, G and G′), and 3 cell lines were compared with FTA punch (H and H′, I and I′, J and J′)