Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of cryopreserved donor skin viability: the experience of the regional tissue bank of Siena

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Banking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Skin allografts from cadaver donors are an important resource for treating extensive burns, slow-healing wounds and chronic ulcers. A high level of cell viability of cryopreserved allografts is often required, especially in burn surgery, in Italy. Thus, we aimed to determine which conditions enable procurement of highly viable skin in our Regional Skin Bank of Siena. For this purpose, we assessed cell viability of cryopreserved skin allografts procured between 2011 and 2013 from 127 consecutive skin donors, before and after freezing (at day 15, 180, and 365). For each skin donor, we collected data concerning clinical history (age, sex, smoking, phototype, dyslipidemia, diabetes, cause of death), donation process (multi-tissue or multi-organ) and timing of skin procurement (assessment of intervals such as death-harvesting, harvesting-banking, death-banking). All these variables were analysed in the whole case study (127 donors) and in different groups (e.g. multi-organ donors, non refrigerated multi-tissue donors, refrigerated multi-tissue donors) for correlations with cell viability. Our results indicated that cryopreserved skin allografts with higher cell viability were obtained from female, non smoker, heartbeating donors died of cerebral haemorrhage, and were harvested within 2 h of aortic clamping and banked within 12 h of harvesting (13–14 h from clamping). Age, cause of death and dyslipidaemia or diabetes did not appear to influence cell viability. To maintain acceptable cell viability, our skin bank needs to reduce the time interval between harvesting and banking, especially for refrigerated donors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banyard DA, Bourgeois JM, Widgerow AD, Evans GR (2015) Regenerative biomaterials: a review. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(6):1740–1748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn JH, Boemi L, Hall WW et al (1998) Negative-pressure dressings as a bolster for skin grafts. Ann Plast Surg 40(5):453–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo D, Rigley TH, Gibran N, Strong DM, Newman-Gage H (2000) Effect of storage and preservation methods on viability in transplantable human skin allografts. Burns 26(4):367–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castagnoli C, Alotto D, Cambieri I et al (2003) Evaluation of donor skin viability: fresh and cryopreserved skin using tetrazolium salt assay. Burns 29:759–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland H, Wasiak J, Dobson H et al (2014) Clinical application and viability of cryopreserved cadaveric skin allografts in severe burns: a retrospective analysis. Burns 40(1):61–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • EU guidelines to good manufacturing practice medicinal products for human and veterinary use—Annex 1, Ed. 2008

  • Franchini M, Zanini D, Bosinelli A et al (2009) Evaluation of cryopreserved donor skin viability: the experience of the regional tissue bank of Verona. Blood Transfus 7:100–105

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gaucher S, Jarraya M (2014) Cryopreserved human skin allografts: efficacy and viability. Burns 40(3):526–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaucher S, Elie C, Verola O, Jarraya M (2012) Viability of cryopreserved human skin allografts: effects of transport media and cryoprotectants. Cell Tissue Bank 13:147–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf G, Hansbrough JF (1994) Current trends in the use of allograft skin for patients with burns and reflections on the future of skin banking in the United States. J Burn Care Rehabil 15(5):428–431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans MHE (2011) Preservation methods of allografts and their (lack of) influence on clinical results in partial thickness burns. Burns 37(5):873–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kua EHJ, Goh CQ, Ting Y et al (2012) Comparing the use of glycerol preserved and cryopreserved allogenic skin for the treatment of severe burns: differences in clinical outcomes and in vitro tissue viability. Cell Tissue Bank 13:269–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leon-Villapalos J, Eldardiri M, Dziewulski P et al (2010) The use of human deceased donor skin allograft in burn care. Cell Tissue Bank 11(1):99–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Overend C, Maitz P, Kennedy P (2012) Quality evaluation of meshed split-thickness skin grafts stored at 4 °C in isotonic solutions and nutrient media by cell cultures. Burns 38(6):899–907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linee guida per il prelievo, la processazione e la distribuzione dei tessuti a scopo di trapianto (2013) Centro Nazionale per i Trapianti (CNT). Linee guida Centro Nazionale Trapianti 10 luglio 2013, LG190607. http://www.trapianti.salute.gov.it

  • May SR, Roberts DP (1988) Development of a passive device for freezing large amounts of transplantable skin at one time in a −70 °C mechanical refrigerator. Cryobiology 25:186–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pianigiani E, Ierardi F, Cherubini F et al (2005) Skin bank organization. Clin Dermatol 23(4):353–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pianigiani E, Ierardi F, Cuciti C et al (2010) Processing efficacy in relation to microbial contamination of skin allografts from 723 donors. Burns 36:347–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pianigiani E, Ierardi F, Fimiani M (2013) Importance of good manufacturing practices in microbiological monitoring in processing human tissues for transplant. Cell Tissue Bank 14(4):601–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pirnay JP, Verween G, Pascual B et al (2012) Evaluation of a microbiological screening and acceptance procedure for cryopreserved skin allografts based on 14 day cultures. Cell Tissue Bank 13(2):287–295

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Robb EC, Bechmann N, Plessinger RT et al (2001) Storage media and temperature maintain normal anatomy of cadaveric human skin for transplantation to full-thickness skin wounds. J Burn Care Rehabil 22(6):393–396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney P, Eagle M, Hogg P et al (2008) Sterilisation of skin allograft with gamma irradiation. Burns 34(5):664–673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saffle JR (2009) Closure of the excised burn wound: temporary skin substitutes. Clin Plast Surg 36(4):627–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schiozer WA, Gemperli R, Mühlbauer W et al (2013) An outcome analysis and long-term viability of cryopreserved cultured epidermal allografts. Assessment of the conservation of transplantable human skin allografts. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira 28(12):824–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • See P, Phan TT, Chua JJ et al (2001) Our clinical experience using cryopreserved cadaveric allograft for the management of severe burns. Cell Tissue Banking 2:113–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Udoh Y, Yanaga H, Tai Y et al (2000) Long-term viability of cryopreserved cultured epithelial grafts. Burns 26(6):535–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeken G, Verween G, De Vos D et al (2012) Glycerol treatment as recovery procedure for cryopreserved human skin allografts positive for bacteria and fungi. Cell Tissue Bank 13(1):1–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Walcerz DB, Karow AM (1996) Cryopreservation of cells for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2(2):85–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Liu X, Umino T et al (2001) Cigarette smoke inhibits human bronchial epithelial cell repair processes. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 25(6):772–779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood JM, Soldin M, Shaw TJ, Szarko M (2014) The biomechanical and histological sequelae of common skin banking methods. J Biomech 47(5):1215–1219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang GY, Zhang CL, Liu XC et al (2013) Effects of cigarette smoke extracts on the growth and senescence of skin fibroblasts in vitro. Int J Biol Sci 9(6):613–623

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Pianigiani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pianigiani, E., Tognetti, L., Ierardi, F. et al. Assessment of cryopreserved donor skin viability: the experience of the regional tissue bank of Siena. Cell Tissue Bank 17, 241–253 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-016-9550-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-016-9550-0

Keywords

Navigation