Skip to main content
Log in

Polarization of human donor corneas

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Banking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the de-orientation effect of DSAEK grafts by observing the cross patterns and polarization power of human donor corneas using a polarizing device (Lumaxis®). Forty human donor corneas were placed in small petri-plates with epithelial side facing up. Polarizing power (arbitrary unit) and crosses were monitored and recorded by the software. The tissue was marked at ‘Superior’ position to ensure that the base and the polarizer are in alignment with each other after the cut. The anterior lamellar cut was performed using microkeratome. The lenticule was placed back in the same position as marked to mimic the alignment. The tissue was further rotated by 45° ensuring that the base of the cornea and the polarizer were in alignment. The polarization power and ‘crosses’ were identified at each step. The average of forty corneas from pre-cut to post-45° angular change showed statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in terms of polarizing power. The cross-shaped pattern deformed and lost the sharpness towards 45° angle. However, multiple variances in terms of ‘cross-patterns’ were observed throughout the study. Lumaxis® was able to determine the worst quality tissue in terms of polarization (no black zone and crosses). Despite the quality of cross pattern which can be used as an additional objective parameter to evaluate the optical properties of the corneal tissue, this preliminary study needs to be further justified in terms of clinical relevance whether polarization changes with oriented or de-oriented grafts have any effects and consequences on the visual acuity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bone RA, Draper G (2007) Optical anisotropy of the human cornea determined with a polarizing microscope. Appl Opt 46:8351–8357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bueno JM, Vargas-Martin F (2002) Measurements of the corneal birefringence with a liquid-crystal imaging polariscope. Appl Opt 41:116–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cope WT, Wolbarsht ML, Yamanashi BS (1978) The corneal polarisation cross. J Opt Soc Am 68:1139–1141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue DJ, Stoyanov BJ, McCally RL, Farrell RA (1995) Numerical modeling of the cornea’s lamellar structure and birefringence properties. J Opt Soc Am A: 12:1425–1438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lekner J (1995) Isogyre formation by isotropic refracting bodies. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 15:69–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maurice DM (1957) The structure and transparency of the cornea. J Physiol (Lond) 136:263–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida T (2005) Cornea. In: Krachmer J, Mannis M, Holland E (eds) Cornea: fundamentals, diagnosis and management, vol 1. Elsevier-Mosby, Philadelphia, pp 3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierscionek B (1993) Explanation of isogyre formation by the eye lens. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 13:91–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pierscionek B, Chan D (1993) Mathematical decription of isogyre formation in refracting structures. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 13:212–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierscionek Barbara K, Lekner John (1997) Polarization patterns in refracting structures. JOSA A 14:676–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierscionek B, Reytomas R (1996) Light intensity distributions in refracting structures placed between crossed polarizers. Exp Eye Res 62:573–580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pierscionek Barbara K, Weale Robert A (1997) Is there a link between corneal structure and the ‘corneal cross’? Eye 11:361–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanworth A, Naylor EJ (1950) The polarization optics of the isolated cornea. Br J Ophthalmol 34:201–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stanworth A, Naylor EJ (1953) Polarized light studies of the cornea. J Exp Biol 30:160–169

    Google Scholar 

  • VanBlokland GJ, Verhelst Se (1987) Corneal polarisation in the living human eye explained with a biaxial model. J OptSocAm 4:82–90

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors do not have any acknowledgements. Authors MP, AR, GS, SF, HE and DP are employed by the Veneto Eye Bank Foundation and author EL is a self funded author who also is the owner of the described device.

Author contributions

MP, AR and GS participated in the design of the study, experiments and analysis, MP, SF, HE, DP and EL participated in the design of the study, interpretation and statistics and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohit Parekh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Mr. Eugenio Lipari, Phronema srl, is the owner of the patented Lumaxis® technology with the patent numbers PCT/IB2013/058263 and PCT/IB2014/063482. Mr. Lipari has potential financial conflict of interest. All the authors from the Veneto Eye Bank Foundation have no financial conflicts.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parekh, M., Ruzza, A., Ferrari, S. et al. Polarization of human donor corneas. Cell Tissue Bank 17, 233–239 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-016-9546-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-016-9546-9

Keywords

Navigation