Abstract
Bacteriology testing is mandatory for quality control of recovered cardiovascular allografts (CVA). In this paper, two different bacteriology examinations (A tests) performed before tissue antibiotic decontamination were compared: transport solution filtration analysis (A1) and tissue fragment direct incubation (A2). For this purpose, 521 CVA (326 heart and 195 artery tissues) from 280 donors were collected and analyzed by the European Homograft Bank (EHB). Transport solution (A1) tested positive in 43.25 % of hearts and in 48.21 % of arteries, whereas the tissue samples (A2) tested positive in 38.34 % of hearts and 33.85 % of arteries. The main species identified in both A1 and A2 were Staphylococcus spp. in 55 and 26 % of cases, and Propionibacterium spp. in 8 and 19 %, respectively. Mismatches in bacteriology results between both initial tests A1 and A2 were found. 18.40 % of the heart valves were identified as positive by A1 whilst 13.50 % were considered positive by A2. For arteries, 20.51 % of cases were positive in A1 and negative in A2, and just 6.15 % of artery allografts presented contamination in the A2 test but were considered negative for the A1 test. Comparison between each A test with the B and C tests after antibiotic treatment of the allograft was also performed. A total decontamination rate of 70.8 % of initial positive A tests was obtained. Due to the described mismatches and different bacteria identification percentage, utilization of both A tests should be implemented in tissue banks in order to avoid false negatives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrat-Boyes BG (1964) Homograft aortic valve replacement in aortic incompetence and stenosis. Thorax 19:131–150
Belgian Law on 19 December 2008 concerning the acquisition and use of Human Body Material intended for human medical applications or scientific researches
Brockbank KG, Dawson PE (1993) Citotoxicity of amphotericin B for fibroblasts in human heart valve leaflets. Cryobiology 30:19–24
Cartier R, Metras D, Cloutier A, Dumesnil J, Raymond G, Doyle D, Desaulnier D, Lemieux M (1995) Aortic valve replacement with pulmonary autograft in children and adults. VI International symposium for cardiac bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 2(suppl):177–179
CSS—Conseil Superior de la Santé. Contrôle microbiologique du matériel corporel humain destiné à une application chez l’homme pour garantir un maximum de sécurité microbiologique: Recommandations pratiques. Avis no. 8698
CSS—Conseil Superior de la Santé (2007) Standards de qualité particuliers pour les cellules humaines pour lesquelles aucun autre standard de qualité particulier n’existe et qui sont destinées à une application chez l’homme. Bruxelles: CSS. Avis no. 8318
CSS—Conseil Superior de la Santé (2013) Standards de qualité pour les différents types de matériels corporels humains destinés à une application humaine; les tissus. Bruxelles: CSS. Avis no. 8716
Euro-GTPs (2011) European project on good tissue practices. www.eurogtps.com
European Commission (2006a) directive 2006/17/EG implementing directive requirements for the donation, procurement and testing of human tissues and cells. Official Journal of the European Union 2006
European Commission (2006b) directive 2006/86/EG implementing directive 2004/23/EC of the European parliament and the council as regards traceability requirements, notification of serious adverse reactions and events and certain technical requirements for the coding, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells
European Pharmacopoeia (2012) 7.3.-2.6.1: Sterility
European Union (2004) Directive 2004/23/CE of the European parliament and the council of March 31st relating to the establishment of quality and safety norms to donate, to obtain, to assess, to process, to preserve, to store and to distribute human cells and human tissues
Fan YD, Van Hoeck B, Holovska V, Jashari R (2012) Evaluation of decontamination process of heart valve and artery tissues in European Homograft Bank (EHB): a retrospective study of 1055 cases. Cell Tissue Bank 13:297–304
Gatto C, Giurgola L, Tothova JD’A (2013) A suitable and efficient procedure for the removal of decontaminating antibiotics from tissue allografts. Cell Tissue Bank 14:107–115
Gerosa G, Mc Kay R, Ross DN (1991) Replacement of the aortic valve or root with a pulmonary autograft in children. Ann Thorac Surg 51:424–429
Goffin Y, Grandmougin D, Van Hoeck B (1996) Banking cryopreserved heart valves in Europe: assessment of a 5-year operation in an international tissue bank in Brussels. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 10:505–512
Goffin YA, Van Hoeck B, Jashari R, Soots G, Kalmar P (2000) Banking of cryopreserved heart valves in Europe: assessment of a 10-year operation in the European Homograft Bank (EHB). J Heart Valve Dis 9:207–214
Hopkins RA (1989) Cardiac reconstructions with allograft tissues. Springer, Berlin
Jashari R, Tabaku M, Van Hoeck B, Cochéz C, Callant M, Vanderkelen A (2007) Decontamination of heart valve and arterial allografts in the European Homograft Bank (EHB): comparison of two different antibiotic cocktails in low temperature conditions. Cell Tissue Bank 8:247–255
Jones AL, Parker R, Manning LS, Abrecht H (2012) Cardiac tissue: specific recovery and processing issues. In: Fehily D, Brubaker SA, Kearney JN, Wolfinbarger L (eds) Tissue and cell processing: an essential guide. Blackwell, Oxford
Joyce F, Tingleff J, Petterson G (1995) The Ross operation: results of early experience including treatment for endocarditis. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 9:384–392
Leeming JP, Lovering AM, Hunt CJ (2005) Residual antibiotics in allograft heart valve tissue samples following antibiotic disinfection. J Hosp Infect 60:231–234
Liang KY, Zeger S (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13–22
Lieber ML, Ashely C (1998) A SAS macro implementing an extension of McNemar’s test for clustered data. SUGI 23, Paper 204
Murray G (1956) Homologous aortic valve segment transplants as surgical treatment for aortic and mitral insufficiency. Angiology 7:466–471
Obuchowski NA (1998) On the comparison of correlated proportions for clustered data. Stat Med 17:1495–1507
Ross DN (1962) Homograft replacement of aortic valve. Lancet 2:487
Royal Decree 28.09.2009 (C-2009/18414): Normes de qualité et de sécurité pour le don, le prélèvement, l’obtention, le contrôle, le traitement, le stockage et la distribution de Matériel Corporel Humain, auxquelles les banques de MCH, les structures intermédiaires de MCH et les établissements de production doivent répondre (M.B. du 23.10.2009)
Soo A, Healy DG, El-Bashier H, Shaw S, Wood AE (2011) Quality control in homograft valve processing: when to screen for microbiological contamination? Cell Tissue Bank 12:185–190
Tabaku M, Jashari R, Carton HF, Du Verger A, Van Hoeck B, Vanderkelen A (2004) Cell Tissue Bank 5:261–266
Van Kats JP, van Tricht C, van Dijk A, van der Schans M, van der Bogaerdt A, Petit PLC, Bogers AJJC (2010) Microbiological examination of donated human cardiac tissue in heart valve banking. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 37:163–169
Vogt PR, Bauer ER, Von Segesser LK, Turina MI (1992) Homograft-Monocusp-Implantation zur Rekonsgtruktion des rechtsventrikulfiren Ausflugtraktes bei der Korrektur der Fallot-Tetralogie. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 122:975–978
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Díaz Rodríguez, R., Van Hoeck, B., Mujaj, B. et al. Bacteriology testing of cardiovascular tissues: comparison of transport solution versus tissue testing. Cell Tissue Bank 17, 211–218 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-015-9537-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-015-9537-2