Skip to main content
Log in

Informed consent to tissue donation: policies and practice

  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Banking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nearly 10 years ago, the tissue industry’s informed consent practices with donor families in the United States were criticized. In response, the industry, along with the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, suggested elements to be included in the informed consent process. This study examines which of these elements were present in the informed consent documents of 45 (78%) of the nation’s 58 Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs). Some elements, such as involvement of for-profit companies, were present in almost all. Others, such as labeling tissue as a gift from donor families, never were. The authors conclude that the time is ripe for reexamination of the informed consent process with an eye to meaningful consent that promotes the benefits of tissue transplantation and at the same time protects the rights and interests of donor families; can be realistically implemented; and, maintains the trust of the American public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association of Tissue Banks (AATB), Eye Bank Association of America (EBAA), Association of Organ Procurement Organizations (AOPO) (2001) Model elements of informed consent for organ and tissue donation: joint statement. 2000. In Report of the Office of the Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services. Informed Consent in Tissue Donation: Expectations and Realities. OEI-01-00-0044 Appendix B:19–20

  • Association of Organ Procurement Organizations (AOPO) Task Force on Tissue Donation (2001) Milestone report

  • California Senate Bill 617 (2003)

  • Campbell CS (2003) The gift and the market: cultural symbolic perspectives. In: Youngner SJ, Anderson MW, Shapiro R (eds) Transplanting human tissue: ethics, policy and practice. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 139–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney J (2000) The market for human tissue. Va Law Rev 86(2):163–223. doi:10.2307/1073915

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mcallister DR et al (2007) Allograft update: the current status of tissue regulation, procurement, processing, and sterilization. Am J Sports Med 35:2148–2158. doi:10.1177/0363546507308936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Kidney Foundation’s National Donor Family Council Executive Committee Informed Consent Policy for Tissue Donation. In Report of the Office of the Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services. Informed consent in tissue donation: expectations and realities. OEI-01-00-0044 Appendix A:18

  • Report of the Office of the Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services (2001) Informed consent in tissue donation: expectations and realities. OEI-01-00-0044

  • The National Organ Transplant Act (1984 Public Law 98-507) UNOS web site http://www.optn.org/latestData/rptData.asp. Accessed 21 May 2008

  • Wisconsin Assembly Bill 659 (2005)

  • Youngner SJ (2003) Informed consent. In: Youngner SJ, Anderson MW, Shapiro R (eds) Transplanting human tissue: ethics, policy and practice. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 168–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngner SJ, Anderson MW, Shapiro R (eds) (2003) Transplanting human tissue: ethics, policy, and practice. Oxford University Press, New York, p xii

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Barbara Juknialis, M.A. for her editorial and administrative assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart J. Youngner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siegel, A., Anderson, M.W., Schmidt, T.C. et al. Informed consent to tissue donation: policies and practice. Cell Tissue Bank 10, 235–240 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-008-9115-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-008-9115-y

Keywords

Navigation