Abstract
Poor postschool outcomes historically await students with disabilities upon graduation. For more than three decades, professionals have responded to this unfortunate reality by focusing on the provision of effective supports and services for the successful transition to adulthood. Social workers play critical roles in supporting this successful transition, yet they are often left out of conversations on policy and practice. One such area involves the role of social workers in the lives of students with disabilities approaching the rights and responsibilities of legal adulthood. Ethics of social work dictate that social workers must navigate a dynamic tension between acting on behalf of “vulnerable” groups and supporting their capacity to act on their own behalf. This tension may create an unnecessary ambiguity when it comes to responding to issues related to adult decision-making support. In this paper, the authors discuss the landscape of decision-making supports in the context of modern social work practice and the ways in which social workers can and should re-think their position on guardianship for transition-age students with disabilities. Practical suggestions to enhance transition outcomes through alternatives to guardianship are provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References
Asamoah, E., Hau-lin Tam, C., & Cudjoe, E. (2021). A systematic review of the roles of social workers in inclusive education for children with disabilities. International Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872820971707
Bachman, S. S., & Comeau, M. (2010). A call to action for social work: Minimizing financial hardships for families of children with special health care needs. Health and Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/35.3.233
Berzin, S. C., & O’Connor, S. (2010). Educating today’s school social workers: Are school social work courses responding to the changing context? Children & Schools, 32(4), 237–249.
Bianco, M., Garrison-Wade, D. F., Tobin, R., & Lehmann, J. P. (2009). Parents’ perceptions of postschool years for young adults with developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(3), 186–196.
Blanck, P., & Martinis, J. G. (2015). “The right to make choices”: The national resource center for supported decision-making. Inclusion, 3(1), 24–33.
Bouck, E. C., & Joshi, G. S. (2016). Transition and students with mild intellectual disability: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(3), 154–163.
Bradley, V., Hiersteiner, D., St. John, J., & Bourne, M. L. (2019). What do NCI data reveal about the guardianship status of people with IDD? (Data brief). National Core Indicators. Retrieved from https://www.nationalcoreindicators.org/resources/data-briefs/
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
Chao, P.-C. (2018). Using self-determination of senior college students with disabilities to predicttheir quality of life one year after graduation. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 1–8.
Council, N., & on Disability (U.S.) (Eds.). (2018). Beyond guardianship: Toward alternatives that promote greater self-determination. National Council on Disability.
Dente, C. L., & Parkinson Coles, K. (2012). Ecological approaches to transition planning for students with autism and Asperger’s Syndrome. Children & Schools, 34(1), 27–36.
Dillon, S., Armstrong, E., Goudy, L., Reynolds, H., & Scurry, S. (2021). Improving special education service delivery through interdisciplinary collaboration. Teaching Exceptional Children. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F00400599211029671
Downes, B. R. (1992). Guardianship for people with severe mental retardation: Consent for urgently needed treatment. Health & Social Work, 17(1), 13–15.
Dubberly, R. G. (2011). A multi-faceted approach to successful transition for students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 46–51.
Field, S., Martin, J., Miller, R., Ward, M., & Wehemyer, M. (1998). Self-determination for persons with disabilities: A position statement of the division on career development and transition. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 21(2), 113–128.
Gauthier-Boudreault, C., Gallagher, F., & Couture, M. (2017). Specific needs of families of young adults with profound intellectual disability during and after transition to adulthood: What are we missing? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 66, 16–26.
Graybeal, C. (2001). Strengths-based social work assessment: Transforming the dominant paradigm. Families in Society: THe Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 82(3), 233–242.
Hagiwara, M., Shogren, K. A., & Rifenbark, G. G. (2020). Examining the impact of personal factors on scores on the self-determination inventory: Adult report in adults with disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 18(2), 120–130.
Hanley-Maxwell, C., Whitney-Thomas, J., & Pogoloff, S. (1995). The second shock: A qualitative study of parents’ perspectives and needs during their child’s transition from school to adult life. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20(1), 3–15.
Hooyman, N. R., Mahoney, K., & Sciegaj, M. (2013). Preparing social workers with person-centered and participant-directed services for the changing aging and disability network. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 56(7), 573–579.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. https://www.congress.gov/bill/108th-congress/house-bill/1350.
Jameson, J. M., Riesen, T., Polychronis, S., Trader, B., Mizner, S., Martinis, J. M., & Hoyle, D. (2015). Guardianship and the potential of supported decision making with individuals with disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40(1), 36–51.
LaChapelle, Y., Wehmeyer, M. L., Haelewyck, M. C., Courbois, Y., Keith, K. D., Schalock, R., & Walsh, P. N. (2005). The relationship between quality of life and self-determination: An international study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(10), 740–744.
Laws, J., Parish, S. L., Scheyett, A. M., & Egan, C. (2010). Preparation of social workers to support people with developmental disabilities. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 30, 317–333.
Lee, Y., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Williams-Diehm, K., Davies, D. K., & Stock, S. E. (2012). Examining individual and instruction-related predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities: Multiple regression analyses. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 150–161.
Lindsey, P., Guy, B., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Martin, J. (2001). Age of majority and mental retardation: A position statement of the division on mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36(1), 3–15.
MacLeod, K. (2017). “I should have big dreams” A qualitative case study on alternatives to guardianship. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(2), 194–207.
Martinis, J. G. (2014). One person, many choices: Using special education transition services to increase self-direction and decision-making and decrease overbroad or undue guardianship. Retrieved from Jenny Hatch Justice Project website: http://jennyhatchjusticeproject.org/docs/publications/jhjp_publications_draftarticle_guardianship.pdf
Martinis, J., Harris, J., Fox, D., & Blanck, P. (2021). State guardianship laws and supported decision-making in the United States after ross and ross v. hatch: Analysis and implications for research policy, education, and advocacy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies,. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073211028586
Maschi, T., Baer, J., & Turner, S. G. (2011). The psychological goods on clinical social work: A content analysis of the clinical social work and social justice literature. Journal of Social Work Practice, 25(2), 233–253.
Mazzotti, V. L., Rowe, D. A., Kwiatek, S., Voggt, A., Chang, W. H., Fowler, C. H., & Test, D. W. (2021). Secondary transition predictors of postschool success: An update to the research base. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64.
Mazzotti, V. L., Rowe, D. A., Sinclair, J., Poppen, M., Woods, W. E., & Shearer, M. L. (2016). Predictors of post-school success: A systematic review of NLTS2 secondary analyses. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(4), 196–215.
McDougall, J., Evans, J., & Baldwin, P. (2010). The importance of self-determination to perceived quality of life for youth and young adults with chronic conditions and disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 31(4), 252–260.
Millar, D. S. (2003). Age of majority, transfer of rights and guardianship: considerations for families and educators. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38(4), 378–397.
Millar, D. S. (2007). “I never put it together”: The disconnect between self-determination and guardianship-implications for practice. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42(2), 119–129.
Millar, D. S. (2013). Guardianship alternatives: Their use affirms self-determination of individuals with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(3), 291–305.
Millar, D. S., & Renzaglia, A. (2002). Factors affecting guardianship practices for young adults with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 68(4), 465–484.
Morris, P. M. (2002). The capabilities perspective: A framework for social justice. Families Insociety: THe Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 83(4), 365–373.
National Association of Social Workers (2021). NASW Code of Ethics. Retrieved June 23, 2022 from https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
Neece, C. L., Kraemer, B. R., & Blacher, J. (2009). Transition satisfaction and family well being among parents of young adults with severe intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(1), 31–43.
Newman, L., Wagner, M., Knokey, A.-M., Marder, C., Nagle, K., Shaver, D., & Wei, X. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). National Center for Special Education Research, NCSER 2011-3005.
O’Brien, J., & Lovett, H. (1992). Finding a way to everyday lives: The contribution of person centered planning. Pennsylvania Office of Mental Retardation.
O’Byrne, C., & Muldoon, O. T. (2019). The construction of intellectual disability by parents and teachers. Disability & Society, 34(1), 46–67.
Perske, R. (1972). The dignity of risk. In W. Wolfensberger (Ed.), Normalization (pp. 194–200). Leonard Crainford.
Phillippo, K. L., Kelly, M. S., Shayman, E., & Frey, A. (2017). School social worker practice decisions: The impact of professional models, training, and school context. Families in Society: THe Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 98(4), 275–283.
Plotner, A. J., & Walters, C. B. (2021). Perceptions of district-and school-level special education leaders on guardianship and adult decision-making support. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F10442073211006395
Rothery, M. (2007). Ecological systems theory. In P. Lehmann & N. Coady (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives for direct social work practice: A generalist-eclectic approach Second Edition. Springer.
Saleeby, D. (1996). The strengths perspective in social work practice: Extensions and cautions. Social Work, 41(3), 296–305.
Schloss, P. J., Alper, S., & Jayne, D. (1993). Self-determination for persons with disabilities: Choice, risk, and dignity. Exceptional Children, 60(3), 215–225.
Shogren, K. A., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2015). A framework for research and intervention design in supported decision-making. Inclusion, 3(1), 17–23.
Shogren, K. A., Whemeyer, M. L., Martinis, J., & Blanck, P. (2018). Supported decision making: Theory, research, and practice to enhance self-determinaiton and quality of life. Cambridge University Press.
Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., & Paek, Y. (2013). Exploring personal and schoolenvironment characteristics that predict self-determination. Exceptionality, 21, 147–157.
Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Soukup, J. H., Little, T. D., Garner, N., & Lawrence, M. (2007). Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self determination of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 488–510.
Shogren, K. A., & Wittenberg, D. (2020). Improving outcomes of transition-age youth withdisabilities: A life course perspective. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(1), 18–28.
Test, D. W., Mazzotti, V. L., Mustian, A. L., Fowler, C. H., Kortering, L., & Kohler, P. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(3), 160–181.
Uekert, B., & Van Duizend, R. (2011). Adult guardianships: A “best guess” national estimate and the momentum for reform. In Future trends in state courts 2011: Special focus on access to justice. https://ncsc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ctadmin/id/1846
Vicente, E., Verdugo, M. A., Gómez-Vela, M., Fernández-Pulido, R., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Guillén, V. M. (2019). Personal characteristics and school contextual variables associated with student self-determination in Spanish context. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 44, 23–34.
Walters, C. B., Imle, B., & Plotner, A. J. (2022). Age of majority in special education and the compliance-driven denial of student dignity and autonomy. In R. D. Williams (Ed.), Handbook of research on challenging deficit thinking for exceptional education improvement. IGI Global.
Washburn, A. M., & Grossman, M. (2017). Being with a person in our care: Person-centered social work practice that is authentically person-centered. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 60(5), 408–423.
Wehmeyer, M. (1997). Self-determination as an educational outcome: A definitional framework and implications for intervention. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 9(3), 175–209.
Wehmeyer, M. L. (2004). Self-determination and the empowerment of people with disabilities. American Rehabilitation, 28(1), 22–29.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Bolding, N. (1999). Self-determination across living and working environments: A matched samples study of adults with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 37, 353–363.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Bolding, N. (2001). Enhanced self-determination of adults with intellectual disability as an outcome of moving to community-based work or living environments. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 371–383.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Soukup, J. H., Garner, N. W., & Lawrence, M. (2007). Self-determination and student transition planning knowledge and skills: Predicting involvement. Exceptionality, 15(1), 31–44.
Whitney-Thomas, J., & Hanley-Maxwell, C. (1996). Packing the parachute: Parents’ experiences as their children prepare to leave high school. Exceptional Children, 63, 75–87.
Will, M. (1983). OSERS programming for the transition of youth with disabilities: Bridges from school to working life. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED256132.pdf
Yell, M. L., & Bateman, D. F. (2017). Endrew F. v. Douglas county school district (2017) FAPE and the US supreme court. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50(1), 7–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that we have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Smith-Hill, R.B., Walters, C.B., Stinnett, C.V. et al. Social Work as Social Justice: Supporting the Autonomy of Students with Disabilities Through Alternatives to Guardianship. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 40, 503–512 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-022-00895-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-022-00895-9