Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Analysis of Transitional and Permanent Supportive Housing Through the Lens of Young Adult Residents

  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Supportive housing (SH), largely consisting of Transitional Living Programs (TLPs) and Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH), is the primarly intervention being applied to the one-in-ten young adults that experience homelessness in the United States each year. To date, efforts to understand the perception of these programs among young adult tenants have focused singularly on TLPs or PSH. The current qualitative study builds upon previous evidence through a comparative analysis of young adult perceptions of TLPs and PSH and examines the the physical, social, and service environments associated with each program. Results suggest six themes, including three themes focused on factors associated with location, common to both TLPs and PSH: desired proximity to friends, family, and amenities; wanted distance from negative influences; and increased ability to assimilate. Three additional themes focused on the environment internal to the housing program that differentiated the models: shared space with roommates, the service environment and relationships with SH staff, and the moving on process. Findings indicate that location is an important but complex element of the housing environment for all young SH tenants with both positive and negative factors. Within the housing environment, more TLP residents had roommates and spoke of utilizing the services associated with their housing, but discussed feeling less prepared for life after SH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

The study was funded by a grant from NIMH (1R01MH110206 & F31MH126641).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Semborski.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Each author declares that they have no conflict of interest, real or perceived.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the affiliated university’s institutional review board. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Semborski, S., Petry, L. & Henwood, B. A Comparative Analysis of Transitional and Permanent Supportive Housing Through the Lens of Young Adult Residents. Child Adolesc Soc Work J (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-022-00881-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-022-00881-1

Keywords

Navigation