Skip to main content
Log in

eSafety and Sharing Habits with Family and Friends Among Children and Adolescents

  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine eSafety, children’s and teenagers’ awareness of safe browsing, identify their Internet usage patterns, their habits of sharing their surfing experiences with parents and family, and the relationship between usage patterns, sharing habits, and socio-demographic attributes. This is a mixed-method study. A total of 345 participants from Israel completed questionnaires. The findings indicate that children and adolescents spend an average of 3.1 h a day surfing the Web. Their level of awareness of eSafety is medium–high. Young children have a more significant need to share and consult about dealing with Internet-related dangers, with others than do adolescents. It was found that many children and adolescents block channels of dialogue and sharing with their parents, fearing their parents’ reaction, especially parental criticism. Because of the complexity of the environment in which children live, involvement in the children’s lives is important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (2008). Of rhetoric and representation: The four faces of ethnography. The Quarterly Sociological, 49(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agosto, D. E., & Abbas, J. (2015). “Don’t be dumb—that’s the rule I try to live by”: A closer look at older teens’ online privacy and safety attitudes. New Media & Society, 9, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, E., & Delamont, S. (2006). In the roiling smoke: Qualitative inquiry and contested fields. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 747–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beale, A. V., & Hall, K. R. (2007). Cyberbullying: What schools administrators and parents can do. The Clearing House, 81, 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickham, D. S., & Rich M. (2006). Is television viewing associated with social isolation? Roles of exposure time, viewing context, and violent content. Archive of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 160(4), 387–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzekowski, D. L. G., & Robinson, T. N. (2007). Conversations, control, and couch-time: The assessment and stability of parental mediation styles and children’s TV and video viewing. Journal of Children and Media, 1(2), 162–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byron, T. (2008). Safer children in a digital world: The report of the Byron Review. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130401151715/http://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/DCSF-00334-2008.pdf.

  • Ching, C. C., Basham, J. D., & Jang, E. (2005). The legacy of the digital divide, gender, socioeconomic status, and early exposure as predictors of full-spectrum technology use among young adults. Urban Education, 40, 394–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. (2013). The parent app: Understanding families in the digital age. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, G. A., & Scharrer, E. (2007). Media and the american child. Amsterdam, Boston: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, L., Branstetter, S., Cottrell, S., Rishel, C., & Stanton, B. F. (2007). Comparing adolescent and parent perceptions of current and future disapproved internet use. Journal of Children and Media, 1(3), 210–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, S. M., Robinson, S. L., & Nelson, D. A. (2010). Does reality backbite? Physical, verbal, and relational aggression in reality television programs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(2), 282–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duerager, A., & Livingstone, S. (2012). How can parents support children’s internet safety? London: London School of Economics, EU Kids Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. A., Jordan, A. B., & Horner, J. (2011). Only two hours? A qualitative study of the challenges parents perceive in restricting child television time. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 1223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasser, U., Maclay, C., & Palfrey, J. (2010). Working towards a deeper understanding of digital safety for children and young people in developing countries: An exploratory study. Cambridge: Harvard University, Berkman Center for Internet & Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genachowski, C., McDowell, C., & Baker. C. (2009). Empowering parents and protecting children in an evolving media landscape. MB Docket No. 09-104, Before the Federal Communication Commission, Washington, D.C. Released on October 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (2008). Questioning qualitative research: Critical essays. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatlevik, O. E., Guðmundsdóttir, G. B., & Loi, M. (2015). Examining factors predicting students’ digital competence. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, D. M., Shapka, J. D., & Olson, B. F. (2010). To control or not to control? Parenting behaviours and adolescent online aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1651–1656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, L. (2013). Generational differences in content generation in social media: The roles of the gratifications sought and of narcissism. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 997–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S. S. (2016). Through the tablet glass: Transcendent parenting in an era of mobile media and cloud computing. Journal of Children and Media, 10(1), 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2013). Online risk, harm and vulnerability: Reflections on the evidence base for child internet safety policy. ZER: Journal of Communication Studies, 18, 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2005). UK children go online: Final report of key project findings. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Das, R. (2010). Changing media, changing families: Polis media and family series. London, UK: London School of Economic, Polis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Görzig, A. (2014). When adolescents receive sexual messages on the Internet: Explaining experiences of risk and harm. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., & Görzig, A. (Eds.). (2012). Children, risk and safety on the internet: Research and policy challenges in comparative perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., Marsh, J., Plowman, L., Ottovordemgentschenfelde, S., & Fletcher-Watson, B. (2015). Young children (0–8) and digital technology: A qualitative exploratory study. National report, UK.

  • Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Dreier, M., Chaudron, S., & Lagae, K. (2015). How parents of young children manage digital devices at home: The role of income, education and parental style. London: EU Kids Online, LSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Ólafsson, K., & Haddon, L. (2014). Children’s online risks and opportunities: Comparative findings from EU kids Online and Net Children Go Mobile. London: EU Kids Online, LSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Smith, P. (2014). Annual research review: Children and young people in the digital age: The nature and prevalence of risks, harmful effects, and risk and protective factors, for mobile and internet usage. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry: Annual Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. L. (2008). Cyber bullying: A preliminary assessment for school personnel. Psychology in the Schools, 45(4), 323–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D. (2010). Mass communication theory: An introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesch, G. S. (2012). Technology and youth. New Directions for Youth Development, 135, 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesch, G. S., & Talmud, I. (2003). The nature of computer-mediated social networks among Israeli youth. A research report. Haifa: University of Haifa.

  • Miller, M. J. (2006). Warning children about online dangers. PC Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1960747,00.asp.

  • Millwood Hargrave, A., & Livingstone, S. (2009). Harm and offence in media content: A review of the evidence (2nd Revised ed.). Bristol: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom - Office of Communications. (2006). Media literacy audit: Report on media literacy amongst children. London: Ofcom. Available at http://www.ofcom.org.uk/advice/media_literacy/medlitpub/medlitpubrss/children/children.pdf.

  • Ofcom - Office of Communications. (2010). UK adults’ media literacy report. Retrieved May 17, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/adults-media-literacy.pdf.

  • Ofcom - Office of Communications. (2016). UK adults’ media literacy report. Retrieved May 17, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/adults-media-literacy.pdf.

  • Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard. A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 148–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8–18 year-olds. Washington, D.C.: Kaiser Family Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. F., Foehr, U. G., & Rideout, V. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8–18 year-olds. Washington, D.C.: Kaiser Family Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilder, J. D., Brusselaers, M. B., & Bogaerts, S. (2016). The effectiveness of an intervention to promote awareness and reduce online risk behavior in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(2), 286–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., & Kitter, S. (Eds.). (2010). Millennials: A portrait of generation next. Retrieved from http://pewsocialtrends.org/assets/pdf/millennials-confident-connected-open-to-change.pdf.

  • Thomas, R., Cooke, B., & Scott, M. (2005). Strengthening parent–child relationships: The reflective dialogue parent education design. Zero to Three, 26(1), 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandewater, E. A., Bickham, D. S., & Lee, J. H. (2006). Time well spent? Relating television use to children’s free-time activities. Pediatrics, 117(2), 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, B. (2009). Television viewing as a dominant activity of childhood: A developmental theory of television effects. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 2(4), 323–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, R., & Turner, L. (2007). Introducing communication theory. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K., & Ybarra, M. L. (2008). Online “predators” and their victims: Myths, realities, and implications for prevention and treatment. American Psychologist, 63(2), 111–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zilka, C. G. (2014). Empowering parents in the social media age—The Three Element Way. Tel Aviv: Bitan Galim (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilka, C. G. (2015). Social competence of children at risk: Similarities and differences among the various assessors. In E. Grupper & S. Romi (Eds.), Children and adolescents at risk in Israel (Vol 2). The voice of young people and issues faced by child and youth care workers. (pp. 113–185). Tel Aviv: MOFET (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilka, C. G. (2016a). Do online friendships contribute to the social development of children and teenagers? The bright side of the picture. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IJHSS), 6, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilka, C. G. (2016b). Reducing the digital divide among children who received desktop or hybrid computers for the home. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 233–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilka, C. G. (2017a). Awareness of eSafety and potential online dangers amongst children and teenagers. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 319–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilka, C. G. (2017b). Awareness of ICT capabilities, digital literacy, and use of reflective processes in children who received their first home computer. Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 9(1), 80–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gila Cohen Zilka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zilka, G.C. eSafety and Sharing Habits with Family and Friends Among Children and Adolescents. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 36, 521–535 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-018-0573-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-018-0573-1

Keywords

Navigation