“Not in the Same Sandbox”: Cross-Systems Collaborations Between Early Intervention and Child Welfare Systems

Abstract

Maltreatment and disability often coexist in the lives of young children, as children who are maltreated are at a higher risk for developing a disability, and, conversely, children with a disability are at a higher risk of being maltreated. Despite being supported by multiple service systems, young children with disabilities who have experienced maltreatment are often not optimally supported by these service systems. We utilized a mixed methods design to explore how early intervention and child welfare collaborate to support young children with disabilities who have experienced maltreatment. Implications and future directions for research, policy and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Allen, A. D., Hyde, J., & Leslie, L. K. (2012). “I don’t know what they know”: Knowledge transfer in mandated referral from child welfare to early intervention. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1050–1059. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Azzi-Lessing, L. (2010). Growing together: Expanding roles for social work practice in early childhood settings. Social Work, 55, 255–263. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20632660.

  3. Barth, R. P., Scarborough, A., Lloyd, E. C., Losby, J., Casanueva, C., & Mann, T. (2007). Developmental status and early intervention service needs of maltreated children. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Corr, C., & Danner, N. (2013). Court-appointed special advocate strong beginnings: Raising awareness across early childhood and child welfare systems. Early Child Development and Care, 9–10, 1–11. doi:10.1080/03004430.2013.845564.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corr, C., & Santos, R. M. (under review). Jocelin: A “best-case” scenario for young children with disabilities who have experienced abuse? Manuscript submitted for publication.

  7. Derrington, T., & Lippitt, J. (2008). From science to policy to practice: The evolving implementation of federally mandated referrals from child welfare to Part C early intervention. Zero to Three, 28, 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dicker, S., & Gordon, E. (2006). Critical connections for children who are abused and neglected. Infants & Young Children, 19, 170–178. doi:10.1097/00001163-200607000-00002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gateway, Child Welfare Information. (2011). Supporting brain development in traumatized children and youth. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innoncenti, M. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greene, J. C. (2006). Toward a methodology of mixed methods social inquiry. Research in the Schools, 13, 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herman-Smith, R. L. (2009). CAPTA referrals for infants and toddlers: Measuring early interventionists’ perceptions. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 181–191. doi:10.1177/0271121408331259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hibbard, R. A., & Desch, L. W. (2007). Maltreatment of children with disabilities. Pediatrics, 119, 1018–1102. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Howell, D. C. (2010). Statistical methods for psychology (7th ed.). London, UK: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krathwol, D. (2009). Methods of educational and social science research: The logic of methods. Long Grove, IL: Waveland.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Larson, S. A., & Anderson, L. (2006). Children with disabilities and the child welfare system: Prevalence data. Impact, 19, 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lightfoot, E. B., Hill, K., & LaLiberte, T. (2011). Prevalence of children with disabilities in the child welfare system and out of home placement: An examination of administrative records. Child and Youth Services Review, 33, 2069–2075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Litzelfelner, P., & Petr, C. G. (1997). Case advocacy in child welfare. Social Work, 42, 392–402. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9228832

  20. Manders, J. E., & Stoneman, Z. (2009). Children with disabilities in the child protective services system: An analog study of investigation and case management. Child Abuse and Neglect, 33, 229–237. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mertens, D. M. (2005). The inauguration of the International Organization for Cooperation in Evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 124–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Musheno, K. (2006). Children with disabilities and the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. Impact, 19, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Orelove, F. P., Hollahan, D. J., & Myles, K. T. (2000). Maltreatment of children with disabilities: Training needs for a collaborative response. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 185–194. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10695514

  25. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Robinson, C., & Rosenberg, S. (2004). Child welfare referrals to Part C. Journal of Early Intervention, 26, 284–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sedlak, A. J., Mettenburg, J., Basena, M., Petta, I., McPherson, K., Greene, A., & Li, S. (2010). Fourth national incidence study of child abuse and neglect (NIS-4): Report to Congress, executive summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.

  28. Sobsey, D. (2002). Exceptionality, education, and maltreatment. Exceptionality, 10, 29–46. doi:10.1207/S15327035EX1001_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Suhr, D. (1999). Guidelines for reliability, confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis for the scale of athletic priorities. Greeley, CO: University of Northern Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sullivan, P. M., & Knutson, J. F. (1998). The association between child maltreatment and disabilities in a hospital-based epidemiological study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22, 271–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Taylor, O. A. (2009). Identification of maltreatment type in children with disabilities using the national child abuse and neglect data system (NCANDS). Houston, TX: The University of Texas School of Public Health.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tomison, A. M. (1996). Child maltreatment and disability. Issues in Child Abuse Prevention, 7, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported in part by funding from the Doris Duke Child Well-Being Fellowship from Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago and the Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education: Project Blend (H325D110037). The authors thank Dr. Susan Fowler, Dr. Headda Meaddan, Dr. Jennifer Greene and the Doris Duke Child Well-Being Fellowship at Chapin Hall for their support and assistance with this project.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Corr.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Drs. Corr and Santos declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corr, C., Santos, R.M. “Not in the Same Sandbox”: Cross-Systems Collaborations Between Early Intervention and Child Welfare Systems. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 34, 9–22 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-016-0470-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Early intervention
  • Child welfare
  • Maltreatment
  • Disability
  • System collaboration