Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 519–533 | Cite as

Summer Engagement for At-Risk Youth: Preliminary Outcomes from the New York State Workforce Development Study

  • Toni NaccaratoEmail author
  • Megan Brophy
  • Kirsten LaClair


The goal of engaging high-risk youth in pro-social activities is to reduce involvement in the criminal justice system and create experiences that increase the youth’s chance of success in education and employment in the future. However, the literature does not support this assumption. The current study looks at the Summer Youth Engagement Program in New York State (NYSYEP). NYSYEP attempts to engage youth in a variety of pro-social activities including employment; education programs; organized recreation programs; and, volunteer work or community service. The hypothesis for the study was that youth who were engaged in pro-social activities would be more likely to be rearrested than youth who were not engaged. The number of hours of youth engagement was found to reduce the odds of being rearrested, but by only 2 %.


Summer youth employment Youth engagement Youth workforce development Juvenile delinquency Tobit and logistic regression models 



The author’s would like to thank Jeffery Evans, Director of Information Technology for the Department of Juvenile Justice and Opportunities for Youth and Gagan Singh, Master in Computer Science. Without their help, support, expertise, and guidance this project would not have been possible.


  1. American Youth Policy Forum. (1997). Some things DO make a difference for youth: A compendium of evaluations of youth programs and practices. Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum.Google Scholar
  2. Apel, R., Bushway, R., Brame, R., Haviland, A. M., Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (2007). Unpacking the relationship between adolescent employment and antisocial behavior: A matched samples comparison. Criminology, 45(1), 67–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachman, J. G., & Shulenberg, J. (1993). How part-time work intensity relates to drug use, problem behavior, time use, and satisfaction among high school seniors: Are these consequences or merely correlates? Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 220–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brame, R., Bushway, R., Paternoster, R., & Apel, R. (2004). Assessing the effect of adolescent employment on involvement in criminal activity. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20(3), 236–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bullis, M., & Yovanoff, P. (2006). Idle hands: Community employment experiences of formerly incarcerated youth. Journal of Behavioral Disorders, 14(2), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cunningham, W. S., Duffee, D. E., Huang, Y., Steinke, C. M., & Naccarato, T. (2009). On the meaning and measurement of engagement in youth residential centers. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(1), 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engelbrecht, C., Peterson, D., Scherer, A., & Naccarato, T. (2008). “It’s not my fault:” Acceptance of responsibility as a component of engagement in juvenile residential treatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 466–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guttman, R. (1983). Job training partnership act: New help for the unemployed. Monthly Labor Review, 106(3), 3–10.Google Scholar
  9. Hackler, J. C., & Hagan, J. L. (1975). Work and teaching machines as delinquency prevention tools: A four-year follow-up. Social Service Review, 45, 92–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kellerman, A. L., Fuqua-Whitley, D. S., Rivara, F. P., & Mercy, J. (1998). Preventing youth violence: What works? Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leiber, M. J., & Mawhorr, T. L. (1995). Evaluating the use of social skills training and employment with delinquent youth. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23(2), 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Littell, J. H., Alexander, L. B., & Reynolds, W. W. (2001). Client participation: Central and under investigated elements of intervention. Social Service Review, 75, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mc Donald, J. F., & Moffitt, R. A. (1980). The uses of Tobit analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 62(2), 318–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Naccarato, T., Brophy, M., & Courtney, M. E. (2010). Employment outcomes of foster youth: The results from the Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Foster Youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(4), 551–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. New York Association of Training and Employment Professionals, Inc. (2009). The 2009 Summer Youth Employment Program in New York State: Expanding work opportunities for youth through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Retrieved May 2, 2010 from
  16. Ploeger, M. (1997). Youth employment and delinquency: Reconsidering a problematic relationship. Criminology, 35(4), 659–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. U.S. Department of Labor. (1998). Workforce Investment Act of 1998. Retrieved June 1, 2010 from
  18. Yachmenoff, D. K. (2003). Measuring client engagement from the client’s perspective in nonvoluntary child protective services. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(2), 84–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social WelfareUniversity at AlbanyAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.New York State Office of Children and Family Services, Office of Workforce DevelopmentRensselaerUSA

Personalised recommendations