Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 237–255 | Cite as

Parent–Child Visits in Foster Care: Reaching Shared Goals and Expectations to Better Prepare Children and Parents for Visits



This study presents descriptive findings from a project designed to understand different perspectives about family visits, to pilot a guidebook tool to help participants reach shared goals, and implement best practices. A sample of 133 parents, children, foster parents, and social workers reported their reactions to the tool. Findings revealed that, depending on the role played in visits, there was variation in perceived goals of visits and ideas about handling difficult visits. After using the tool, parents reported feeling better able to manage their emotions during visits, children reported believing their feelings about visits were more normal, and foster parents were more open to discussing parent no-shows with children. Implications for practice are discussed.


Foster care Foster care visitation Parent–child visits Ambiguous loss 


  1. Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980. Public Law 96–272, Ninety-Sixth Congress, H.R. 3434.Google Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, M. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44(4), 709–716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benedict, M. I., & White, R. B. (1991). Factors associated with foster care length of stay. Child Welfare, 70(1), 45–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boss, P. (1999). Ambiguous Loss: Learning to Live with Unresolved Grief. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Boss, P. (2006). Ambiguous loss: preventive interventions for family professionals. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 98(2), 8–10.Google Scholar
  6. Boss, P. (2007). Ambiguous loss theory: challenges for scholars and practitioners. Family Relations, 56(2), 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Browne, D., & Moloney, A. (2002). ‘Contact irregular’: a qualitative analysis of the impact of visiting patterns of natural parents on foster placements. Child & Family Social Work, 7(1), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cantos, A. L., Gries, L. T., & Slis, V. (1997). Behavioral correlates of parental visiting during family foster care. Child Welfare, 76(2), 309–329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Children’s Defense Fund. (2007). Minnesota Kids Count. St. Paul: Children’s Defense Fund, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, I. P., Landsverk, J., Newton, R., & Ganger, W. (1996). Parental visiting and foster care reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 18(4/5), 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haight, W. L., Black, J. E., Workman, C. L., & Tata, L. (2001). Parent-child interaction during foster care visits. Social Work, 46(4), 325–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haight, W. L., Mangelsdorf, S., Black, J. E., Szewczyk, M., Schoppe, S., Giorgio, G., et al. (2005). Enhancing parent-child interaction during foster care visits: experimental assessment of an intervention. Child Welfare, 84(4), 459–481.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hess, P. (1988). Case and context: determinants of planned visit frequency in foster family care. Child Welfare, 67(4), 311–326.Google Scholar
  14. Hess, P. (2003). Visiting Between Children in Care and Their Families: A Look at Current Policy. National Resource Center for Foster Care & Permanency Planning. Hunter College: New York.Google Scholar
  15. Kapp, S. A., & Propp, J. (2002). Client satisfaction methods: input from parents with children in foster care. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 19(3), 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, R. E., & Whiting, J. B. (2007). Foster children’s expressions of ambiguous loss. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 35, 417–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Loar, L. (1998). Making visits work. Child Welfare, 77(1), 41–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. McMurty, S., & Lie, G.-Y. (1992). Differential exit rates of minority children in foster care. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 28(1), 42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McWey, L. M., & Mullis, A. K. (2004). Improving the lives of children in foster care: the impact of supervised visitation. Family Relations, 53, 293–300.Google Scholar
  20. Perkins, D. F., & Ansay, S. J. (1998). The effectiveness of a visitation program in fostering visits with noncustodial parents. Family Relations, 47(3), 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Poulin, J. E. (1992). Kin visiting and the biological attachment of long-term foster children. Journal of Social Service Research, 15(3/4), 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roberts, D. (2002). Shattered Bonds: The Color of Welfare. New York: Basic Civitas Books.Google Scholar
  23. Samuels, G. M. (2008). A reason, a season, a lifetime: Relational performance among young adults with foster care backgrounds. Chicago: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  24. Samuels, G. M. (2009). Ambiguous loss of home: the experience of familial (im)permanence among young adults with foster care backgrounds. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 1229–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. White, M., Albers, E., & Bitonti, C. (1996). Factors in length of foster care: worker activities and parent-child visitation. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 23(2), 75–83.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social WorkUniversity of St. ThomasSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations