Advertisement

Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 137–149 | Cite as

Barriers to Prevention: Ethnic and Gender Differences in Latino Adolescent Motivations for Engaging in Risky Behaviors

  • Claudia L. MorenoEmail author
  • Judith C. Baer
Article

Abstract

Using a sample from the Longitudinal Study of Adolescent health (Add health), we tested whether psychosocial motivation or health factors were the best predictors of sexual engagement by Latinos. The Latino sample (3,460) included sub samples of Mexican (n = 1587) Chicano (n = 137), Cuban (n = 501), Puerto Rican (n = 586), Central/South American (n = 367) adolescents and individuals self-identified as Hispanic other (n = 282). Our findings showed that most Latino adolescents understood that if they had unprotected sex they were at risk for HIV/AIDS and STI’s. Additionally, as we hypothesized, the motivation items were better predictors of sexual engagement than the health risk items. However, the motivation items were only significant for the females with one exception, the Mexican males. There were other subgroup differences as well. Our findings have important implications for prevention strategies.

Keywords

HIV/AIDS Hispanics Sexual risk behaviors Prevention STIs 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the School of Social Work, Rutgers University. The findings and opinions reported here are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of any other individuals or organizations.

References

  1. Albarracín, D., Gillette, J., Earl, A. N., Glasman, L., Durantini, M., & Ho, M. (2005). A test of major assumptions about behavior change: A comprehensive look at the effects of passive and active HIV-prevention since the beginning of the epidemic. Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 856–897.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. San Francisco: Josesey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowlby, J. (1970). Disruption of affectional bonds and its effects on behavior. Journal of Contemporary Psychology, 2, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buss, D. M. (1996). The evolutionary psychology of human social strategies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 3–38). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, J. L., Volk, K. D., & Hyde, J. S. (1985). Differences between males and females in motives for engaging in sexual intercourse. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 131–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). HIV/AIDS Surveillance in Adolescents and Young Adults (Atlanta: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved August 13, 2011, from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/slides/adolescents/index.htm
  8. Christopher, F. S., & Cate, R. M. (1985). Anticipated influences on sexual decision-making for first intercourse. Family Relations, 34, 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, L., Miller, K., Nagy, S., Avery, J., Roth, D., Liddon, N., et al. (2005). Adult identity mentoring: Reducing sexual risk for African–American seventh grade students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37, 337.e1–337.e10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, M. L., Shapiro, C. M., & Powers, A. M. (1998). Motivations for sex and risky sexual behavior among adolescents and young adults: A functional perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1528–1558.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cristopher, F. S., & Cate, R. M. (1984). Factors involved in premarital sexual decision-making. The Journal of Sex Research, 20, 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crosby, R., Leichliter, J. S., & Brackbill, R. (2000). Longitudinal prediction of sexually transmitted diseases among adolescents: results from a national survey. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18, 312–317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, D., Shaver, P. R., & Vernon, M. L. (2004). Attachment style and subjective motivations for sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1076–1090.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeLamater, J. (1987). Gender differences in sexual scenarios. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Females, males, and sexuality: Theories and research (pp. 127–139). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  15. Diaz, R. (2000). Cultural regulation, self-regulation, and sexuality: A psycho-cultural model of HIV risk in Latino gay men. In R. Parker, R. M. Barbosa, & P. Aggleton (Eds.), Framing the sexual subject: The politics of gender, sexuality, and power (pp. 191–215). Los Angeles: UCLA Press.Google Scholar
  16. Guilliam, M., Warde, M., & Tapia, B. (2004). Young Latinas recall contraceptive use before and after pregnancy: A focus group study. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 17(4), 279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris, K. M., Florey, F., Tabor, J., Bearman, P. S., Jones, J., & Udry, J. R. (2003). The national longitudinal study of adolescent health: Research design. From http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design
  18. Hyde, J. S. (1986). Where are the gender differences? Where are the gender similarities? In D. M. Buss & N. M. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power and conflict (pp. 107–118). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Leigh, B. C. (1989). Reasons for having and avoiding sex: Gender sexual orientation, and relationship to sexual behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levinson, R. A., Jaccard, J., & Beamer, L. (1995). Older adolescents’ engagement in casual sex: Impact of risk perception and psychosocial motives. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin, D., Li, X., Stanton, B., Fang, X., Lin, X., Xu, X., et al. (2010). Theory-based HIV-related sexual risk-reduction prevention for Chinese female rural-to-urban migrants. AIDS Education and Prevention, 22(4), 344–355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mirande, A. (1997). Hombres y machos: Masculinity and Latino culture. Bouder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ozer, E. J. (2003). Adolescents’ reasons for having sex: Gender differences. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 317–319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Paiva, V. (2000). Gendered scripts and the sexual scene: Promoting sexual subjects among Brazilian teenagers. In R. Parker, R. M. Barbosa, & P. Aggleton (Eds.), Framing the sexual subject: The politics of gender, sexuality, and power (pp. 216–239). Los Angeles: UCLA Press.Google Scholar
  25. Randolph, B. J., & Winstead, B. (1988). Sexual decision making and object relations theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 17, 389–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sanderson, C. A., & Cantor, N. (1995). Social dating goals in late adolescence: Implications for safer sexual activity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1121–1134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Skinner, E. A., & Wellborn, J. G. (1994). Coping during childhood and adolescence: A motivational perspective. In D. L. Featherman, R. M. Lerner, & M. Perlmutter (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (pp. 91–133). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Snyder, M., & Cantor, N. (1997). Understanding personal and social behavior: A functionalist strategy. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed) (p. 635). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  30. Tolman, D. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Widdice, L., Cornell, J., Liang, W., & Halpern-Felsher, B. (2006). Having sex and condom use: Potential risks and benefits reported by young sexually inexperienced adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 588–595.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fordham UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.RutgersThe State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations