Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 319–334 | Cite as

Challenges and Strategies for Conducting Program-Based Research in After-School Settings

  • Kimberly Bender
  • Daniel Brisson
  • Jeffrey M. Jenson
  • Shandra Forrest-Bank
  • Amy Lopez
  • Jamie Yoder
Article

Abstract

Findings from children and youth who participated in structured after-school interventions in four urban public housing communities are used to illustrate the complexities of conducting program-based research in after-school settings. Findings from four field investigations reveal the importance of family support, reading skills, parent involvement, and positive peers in engaging youth in services, developing academic skills and avoiding involvement in problem behavior. Challenges in conducting program-based research and lessons learned from each of the four studies are discussed in the context of social work practice and after-school programming for at-risk children and youth.

Keywords

At-risk youth After-school programs Evaluation 

References

  1. After-School Alliance. (2008). Summary of findings from a national election eve/election night poll November 2006. Retrieved May 25, 2010, from http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/Fact_Sheet%20Nov%2006%20Poll%20Summary%2004%2008.pdf.
  2. Anthony, E. A., Alter, C. A., & Jenson, J. M. (2009). Development of a risk and resilience based out of school time program for children and youth. Social Work, 54, 45–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaver, J. M. (2006). Teacher guide: Developmental reading assessment, grades K-3 (2nd ed.). Parsippany, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Beaver, J. M., & Carter, M. A. (2003). Teacher guide: Developmental reading assessment, grades 4–8 (2nd ed.). Parsippany, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Belgrave, F. Z., Chase-Vaughn, G., Gray, F., Addison, J. D., & Cherry, V. R. (2000). The effectiveness of a culture- and gender-specific intervention for increasing resiliency among African-American preadolescent females. Journal of Black Psychology, 26, 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bodilly, S., & Beckett, M. K. (2005). Making out of school time matter: Evidence for an action agenda. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  7. Bowen, G. L., & Richman, J. M. (2005). School success profile. Chapel Hill, NC: Jordan Institute for Families, School of Social Work, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Bowen, G. L., Rose, R. A., & Bowen, N. K. (2005). The reliability and validity of the school success profile. Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris Press.Google Scholar
  9. Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA). (2009). DRA 2K-8 Technical manual (2nd edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  10. Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2007). The impacts of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL).Google Scholar
  11. Fabiano, L., Pearson, L. M., & Williams, I. J. (2005). Putting students on a pathway to academic and social success: Phase III findings of the Citizen Schools evaluation. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farber, B. A., & Azar, S. T. (1999). Blaming the helpers: The marginalization of teachers and parents of the urban poor. American Journal of Orthopsychology, 69, 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fashola, O., & Cooper, R. (1999). Developing the academic talents of African American students during the non-school hours: Four exemplary programs. Journal of Negro Education, 68, 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gottfredson, D. C., Gerstenblith, S. A., Soule, D. A., Womer, S. C., & Lu, S. (2004). Do after-school programs reduce delinquency? Prevention Science, 5, 253–266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Halpern, R. (1999). After-school programs for low-income children: Promises and challenges. When School is Out, 9, 81–95.Google Scholar
  17. Haynie, D., & Osgood, D. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces, 84, 1109–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hudley, C. (1999). Problem behaviors in middle childhood: Understanding risk status and protective factors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association in Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  19. Jeynes, W. H. (2003). A meta-analysis: The effects of parental involvement on minority children’s academic achievement. Education & Urban Society, 35(2), 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kahne, J., Nagaoka, J., Brown, A., O’Brien, J., Quinn, T., & Thiede, K. (2001). Assessing after-school programs as contexts for youth development. Youth and Society, 32, 421–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., Snow, D., & Martin-Glenn, M. L. (2006). Out-of-school time programs: A meta-analysis of effects for at-risk students. Review of Educational Research, 76, 275–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lewin, C., & Luckin, R. (2010). Technology to support parental engagement in elementary education: Lessons learned from the UK. Computers & Education, 54, 749–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. LoSciuto, L., Hilbert, S. M., Fox, M. M., Porcellini, L., & Lanphear, A. (1999). A two-year evaluation of the Woodrock Youth Development Project. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 488–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahoney, J. L., Lord, H., & Carryl, E. (2005). An ecological analysis of after-school program participation and the development of academic performance and motivational attributes for disadvantaged children. Child Development, 76, 811–825.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Paris, S. G. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(2), 184–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Riggs, N. R., & Greenberg, M. T. (2004). After-school youth development programs: A developmental-ecological model of current research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 7, 177–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Sickmund, M., Snyder, H. M., & Poe-Yamagata, E. (1997). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1997 update on violence: Statistical summary. Washington: Office of Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  29. St. Pierre, T. L., Mark, M. M., Kaltreider, D. L., & Aikin, K. J. (1997). Involving parents of high-risk youth in drug prevention: A three-year longitudinal study in boys & girls clubs. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17, 21–50.Google Scholar
  30. Taylor Associates. (2009). Reading plus research, rational, and results: A report on the research basis and effectiveness of Reading Plus. Retrieved from http://www.readingplus.com/index.php/download_file/-/view_inline/55.
  31. Turney, K., & Kao, G. (2009). Barriers to school involvement: Are immigrant parents disadvantaged? Journal of Educational Research, 102, 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Office of communications and outreach.Guide to U.S. Department of Education Programs, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  33. Wahl, M. (2007). Florida center for reading research. Read Well. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Center for Reading Research. Retrieved from http://www.fcrr.org/fcrrreports/PDF/read_well_report.pdf.
  34. Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kimberly Bender
    • 1
  • Daniel Brisson
    • 1
  • Jeffrey M. Jenson
    • 1
  • Shandra Forrest-Bank
    • 1
  • Amy Lopez
    • 1
  • Jamie Yoder
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Social WorkUniversity of DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations