Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing Empowerment and Leadership Among Homeless Youth in Agency and Community Settings: A Grounded Theory Approach

  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative study with homeless youth (ages 18–24) was to understand their involvement in decision-making within agency and community settings. Three focus groups with eight, six and six homeless youth were conducted at an urban drop-in center and shelter from June to August 2008. Emergent themes include youth voice and ownership in agency and community programming, emotional safety, power and reciprocal support. Grounded theory is used to interpret findings and develop working hypotheses to guide future studies on empowering homeless youth to assume greater leadership involvement in their own lives, in social service agencies and in their surrounding communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alloway, R., & Bebbington, P. (1987). The buffer theory of social support: A review of the literature. Psychological Medicine, 17(1), 91–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anastas, J. W. (2004). Quality in qualitative evaluation: Issues and possible answers. Research on Social Work Practice, 14(1), 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao, W., Whitbeck, L. B., & Hoyt, D. R. (2000). Abuse, support, and depression among homeless and runaway adolescents. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41(4), 408–420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, S., McMullin, L., Tripp, J., & Tsemberis, S. (2007). Consumer integration and self-determination in homelessness research, policy, planning, and services. In D. Dennis, G. Locke, & J. Khadduri (Eds.), Toward understanding homelessness: The 2007 National Symposium on Homelessness Research (pp. 97–152). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and U.S. Department of Health and Human Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, K., Thompson, S. J., McManus, H., Lantry, J., & Flynn, P. M. (2007). Capacity for survival: Exploring strengths of homeless street youth. Child & Youth Care Forum, 36(1), 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman-Rossi, T., & Cohen, M. B. (1989). Group development and shared decision making with homeless mentally ill women. In J. A. B. Lee (Ed.), Group work with the poor and oppressed (pp. 63–78). New York: The Hayworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, M. (1989). The need for mutual-aid groups in a drop-in for homeless women: The Sistering case. In J. A. B. Lee (Ed.), Group work with the poor and oppressed (pp. 47–61). New York: The Hayworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, R. (2001). I Helped Build That: A demonstration employment training program for homeless youth in Toronto, Canada. America Anthropologist, 103(3), 779–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. B. (1994a). Overcoming obstacles to forming empowerment groups: A consumer advisory board for homeless clients. Social Work, 39(6), 742–749.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. B. (1994b). Who wants to chair the meeting? Group development and leadership patterns in a community action group of homeless people. Social Work with Groups, 17(1/2), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Rosa, C. J., Montgomery, S. B., Kipke, M. D., Iverson, E., Ma, J. L., & Unger, J. B. (1999). Service utilization among homeless and runaway youth in Los Angeles, California: Rates and reasons. Journal of Adolescent Health, 24(6), 449–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2.th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, K., & Xie, B. (2008). Feasibility study of the Social Enterprise Intervention with homeless youth. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, S., & Meezan, W. (2002). Refining the evaluation of treatment foster care. Families in Society, 83(3), 233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janesick, V. J. (1994). The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry and meaning. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 209–219). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabanow, J., & Clement, P. (2004). Interventions with street youth: A commentary on the practice-based research literature. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 4(1), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, S. A. (2003). Street youth: Coping and interventions. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 20(4), 235–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipke, M. D., Unger, J. B., O’Connor, S., Palmer, R. F., & LaFrance, S. R. (1997). Street youth, their peer group affiliation and differences according to residential status, subsistence patterns, and use of services. Adolescence, 32(127), 655–669.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, P. D., Lindsey, E. W., Jarvis, S., & Nackerud, L. (2000). How runaway and homeless youth navigate troubled waters: The role of formal and informal helpers. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 17(5), 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. A. B. (2001). The empowerment approach to social work practice. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linhorst, D. M. (2002). A review of the use and potential of focus groups in social work research. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 1(2), 208–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, B., Hagan, J., & Martin, M. J. (2002). In and out of harm’s way: Violent victimization and the social capital of fictive street families. Criminology, 40(4), 831–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. L., & Allstetter Neufeldt, S. (1996). Building on an empirical foundation: Strategies to enhance good practice. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74(6), 609–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, N. (2004). The role of subjective well-being in positive youth development. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podschun, G. D. (1993). Teen peer outreach-street work project: HIV prevention education for runaway and homeless youth. Public Health Reports, 108(2), 150–155.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, J., Nanji, D., Ginsburg, K., Cnaan, A., & Slap, G. (1996). AIDS prevention in inner-City Puerto Rican adolescents: The teens offer solutions. Journal of Adolescent Health, 18(2), 149–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell, M. K. (1998). Social work constructivist research. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. L., & Whitbeck, L. B. (1991). Sexual abuse as a precursor to prostitution and victimization among adolescent and adult homeless women. Journal of Family Issues, 12(3), 361–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. (2008). Searching for kinship: The creation of street families among homeless youth. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(6), 756–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenner, B. A., Trevithick, L. A., Wagner, V., & Burch, R. (1998). Seattle YouthCare’s prevention, intervention, and education program: A model of care for HIV-positive, homeless, and at-risk youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 23, 96–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, K. A. (2006). A qualitative study of early family histories and transitions of homeless youth. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(10), 1385–1393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, K. A., Hoyt, D. R., Whitbeck, L. B., & Cauce, A. M. (2001). The impact of childhood sexual abuse on later sexual victimization among runaway youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11(2), 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger, J. B., Kipke, M. D., Simon, T. R., & Johnson, C. J. (1998). Stress, coping, and social support among homeless youth. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13(2), 134–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tosh, L., Finkle, M., Hartman, B., Lewis, C., Plumlee, L. A., & Susko, M. A. (1993). Working for a change: Employment of consumers/survivors in the design and provision of services for persons who are homeless and mentally disabled. Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitbeck, L. B. (2009). Mental health and emerging adulthood among homeless young people. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitbeck, L. B., Hoyt, D. R., & Yoder, K. A. (1999). A risk-amplification model of victimization and depressive symptoms among runaway and homeless adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27(2), 273–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, T. A. (1991). Social support and interpersonal relationships. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Prosocial Behavior. Review of Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 265–289). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, S. (1999). Constructing our future. Editorial. Social Work, 44(1), 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by the John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin M. Ferguson.

Appendix A: Focus Group Questions on Youth Leadership/Empowerment

Appendix A: Focus Group Questions on Youth Leadership/Empowerment

  1. 1.

    What are some ways that we could build a stronger sense of community among young people at the agency? Aside from the typical events we celebrate here, what additional events would you like to see us celebrate at the agency?

  2. 2.

    How well do agency staff and the environment make you feel physically and emotionally respected and accepted? What do staff do that make you feel physically and emotionally respected and accepted? What could staff do to make you feel more physically and emotionally respected and accepted?

  3. 3.

    What problems do we currently have at the agency that need solutions? In your opinion, where should we prioritize our efforts in trying to strengthen the agency community and assist youth?

  4. 4.

    What makes you want to participate in a new program or activity at the agency? Are there things that make you not really want to participate in a new program or activity? What are some of these things?

  5. 5.

    What are the best ways to involve other youth clients in leadership activities at the agency? What are the best ways to involve youth clients in leadership activities in the surrounding community? What are some ways you have been able to make a contribution at the agency or in the community?

  6. 6.

    What skills would help you be more involved in leadership activities at the agency or in the community (for example, leadership, planning, decision-making, organizing, team-building, etc.)?

  7. 7.

    How open are staff to clients being involved in leadership positions at the agency? What do staff do to encourage clients to be leaders? How could staff better support clients to be leaders at the agency?

  8. 8.

    While at the agency, have you felt like you have had a voice in programs and activities? Can you give some examples? What are some ways that staff have included your voice in programs and activities?

  9. 9.

    What agency programs and activities would you like to be a part of strengthening? What suggestions do you have for how to strengthen these programs?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferguson, K.M., Kim, M.A. & McCoy, S. Enhancing Empowerment and Leadership Among Homeless Youth in Agency and Community Settings: A Grounded Theory Approach. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 28, 1–22 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-010-0217-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-010-0217-6

Keywords

Navigation