Abstract
Depression is one of the most commonly diagnosed psychiatric disorders among school-aged youth, with high prevalence and far-reaching consequences. However, even though there are two evidence-based practices for treating adolescent depression (Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Interpersonal Therapy), most adolescents referred for treatment are unlikely to receive either. In part, this is due to the difficulty of transporting an evidence-based practice from laboratory to real-world setting, and determining how to transport an empirically validated treatment has thus become a focus of concern for social work researchers and practitioners. A host of client, clinician, setting, and treatment delivery variables can influence portability. Taking all these factors into consideration is a daunting task—but less daunting if done at the onset, during the initial process of efficacy research, rather than afterward as a separate stage. The thesis of this paper is that the only solution to the problem of portability is a combined, rather than sequential, approach to treatment development in which effectiveness and application concerns are included in the original research design. A review of suggested approaches, as well as discussion of factors that contribute to variance in outcome, is followed by recommendations for future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Breland-Noble, A. M., Bell, C., & Nicolas, G. (2006). Family first: The development of an evidence-based family intervention for increasing participation in psychiatric clinical care and research in depressed African American adolescents. Family Process, 45(2), 153–169.
Clarke, G. N. (1995). Improving the transition from basic efficacy research to effectiveness studies: Methodological issues and procedures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 718–715.
Crisp, H. L., Gudmundsen, G. R., & Shirk, S. R. (2006). Transporting evidence-based therapy for adolescent depression to the school setting. Education and Treatment of Children, 29(2), 287–309.
Denton, W. H., Walsh, S. R., & Daniel, S. S. (2002). Evidence-based practice in family therapy: Adolescent depression as an example. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28(1), 39–45.
Dopheide, J. (2006). Recognizing and treating depression in children and adolescents. American Journal of Health System Pharmacy, 63(3), 233–243.
Eley, T. C. (2004). Parental familial vulnerability, family environment, and their interactions as predictors of depressive symptoms in adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(3), 298–306.
Hammen, C., Brennan, P. A., & Shih, J. A. (2004). Family discord and stress predictors of depression and other disorders in adolescent children of depressed and nondepressed women. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(8), 994–1002.
Hamrin, V., & Pachler, M. C. (2005). Child and adolescent depression: Review of the latest evidence-based treatments. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing & Mental Health Services, 43(1), 54–63.
Hoagwood, K., Burns, B. J., Kiser, L., Ringeisen, H., & Schoenwald, S. K. (2001). Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 52, 1179–1189.
Hoagwood, K., Hibbs, E., & Brent, D. (1995). Introduction to the special section: Efficacy and effectiveness studies of child and adolescent psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 683–687.
Jayson, D., Wood, A., Kroll, L., Fraser, J., & Harrington, R. (1998). Which depressed patients respond to cognitive-behavior treatment? Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 37(1), 35–40.
Joyce, A. S., Wolfaardt, U., Sribney, C., & Aylwin, A. S. (2006). Psychotherapy research at the start of the 21st century: the persistence of the art versus science controversy. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 51(13), 797–809.
Karasu, T. B. (1990a). Toward a clinical model of psychotherapy for depression, I: Systematic comparison of three psychotherapies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147(2), 133–147.
Karasu, T. B. (1990b). Toward a clinical model of psychotherapy for depression, II. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147(3), 269–278.
Kendall, P. C., & Gerow, M. A. (1995). Issues in the transportability of treatment: The case of anxiety disorders in youths. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 702–708.
Maag, J. W., & Swearer, S. M. (2005). Cognitive-behavioral interventions for depression: Review and implications for school personnel. Behavioral Disorders, 30(3), 259–276.
Marcotte, D. (1997). Treating depression in adolescence: A review of the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral treatments. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(3), 273–282.
Merrill, K. A., & Tolbert, V. E. (2003). Effectiveness of cognitive therapy for depression in a community mental health center: A benchmarking study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(2), 404–409.
Mufson, L., Gallagher, T., Dorta, K. P., & Young, J. F. (2004). A group adaptation of interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed adolescents. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 58(2), 220–237.
Mufson, L., Weissman, M. M., Moreau, D., & Garfinkel, R. (1999). Efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed adolescents. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56(6), 573–579.
Nathan, P. E., Stuart, S. P., & Dolan, S. L. (2000). Research on psychotherapy efficacy and effectiveness: Between Scylla and Charybodis? Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 964–981.
Pollio, D. E. (2006). The art of evidence-based practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 16(2), 224–232.
Proctor, E. K., & Rosen, A. (2003). The structure and function of social work practice guidelines. In A. Rosen & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Developing practice guidelines for social work intervention (pp. 108–127). New York: Columbia University Press.
Reay, R., Stuart, S., & Owen, C. (2003). Implementation and effectiveness of interpersonal psychotherapy in a community mental health service. Australasian Psychiatry, 11(3), 284–289.
Rossello, J., & Bernal, G. (1999). The efficacy of cognitive-behavioral and interpersonal treatments for depression in Puerto Rican adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(5), 734–745.
Videka, L. (2003). Accounting for variability in client, population, setting characteristics: Moderators of intervention effectiveness. In A. Rosen & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Developing practice guidelines for social work intervention (pp. 169–192). New York: Columbia University Press.
Weersing, V. R., Iyengar, S., Kolko, D. J., Birmaher, B., & Brent, D. A. (2006). Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescent depression: A benchmarking investigation. Behavior Therapy, 37, 36–48.
Weersing, V. R., & Weisz, J. R. (2002). Community clinic treatment of depressed youth: Benchmarking usual care against CBT clinical trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(2), 299–310.
Weisz, J. R., Donenberg, G. R., Han, S. S., & Weiss, B. (1995). Bridging the gap between laboratory and clinic in child and adolescent psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 688–701.
Zayas, L. H. (2003). Service-delivery factors in the development of practice guidelines. In A. Rosen & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Developing practice guidelines for social work intervention (pp. 193–206). New York: Columbia University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Probst, B. Issues in Portability of Evidence-based Treatment for Adolescent Depression. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 25, 111–123 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-008-0115-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-008-0115-3