Characteristics of Four Kinship Placement Outcome Groups and Variables Associated with these Kinship Placement Outcome Groups
- 152 Downloads
This study investigated factors that might be associated with the disrupted kinship care placements of abused and neglected children. Data were collected from face-to-face interviews of 130 kin caregivers who were randomly selected from lists provided by two child protection agencies and divided into four different outcome groups. Findings of the study revealed that characteristics of the children such as their health status, ages, and the extent to which they were getting into “trouble” were significantly associated with placement outcomes. The caregivers’ perceptions of the quality of relationships between themselves and the children in their care and the birth parents of those children were also associated with placement outcomes. Two other factors affecting outcomes were the frequency of contact between social workers and caregivers and the extent to which services plans were discussed. Practice implications related to these findings are discussed.
KeywordsKinship care Kinship placement outcome group Disrupted kinship care Child protective services
- Berrick, J. D., Needell, B., Barth, R., & Jonson-Reid, M. (1998). The tender years: Toward developmentally sensitive child welfare services for very young children. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Child Welfare Research Center (2006). Child Welfare Services (CWS/CMS) Reports Performance Indicators Project. Children in Child Welfare Supervised by Placement Type. http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/ (accessed March 3rd, 2006).
- Dore, M., & Kennedy, K. (1981). Two decades of turmoil: Child Welfare Services, 1960–1980. Child Welfare, 60, 371–382.Google Scholar
- Dubowitz, H., & Feigelman, S. (1993). A profile of kinship care. Child Welfare, 72(2), 153–169.Google Scholar
- Gleeson, J, & Hairston, C. (eds.). (1999). Kinship care: Improving practice through research. Washington D. C.: Child Welfare League of America.Google Scholar
- Pecora, P., LeProhn, N., & Nasuti, J. (1999). Role perception of kinship and other foster parents in family foster care. In R. Hegar & M. Scannapeice (Eds.), Kinship foster care: Policy, practice, and research, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Pecora, P., Whitikar, J., Maluccio, A., Barth, R., & Plotnick, R. (1992). The child welfare challenge. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- San Bernardino County Human Services (2005). 2004 Annual report. (available at http://hss.co.san-bernardino.ca.us/HSS/docs/annualreport/2004HSSAnnualReport.pdf) (accessed December 15, 2005) .
- Scannapieco, M., Hegar, R. L., & McAlpine, C. (1997). Kinship care and foster care; A comparison of characteristics and outcomes. Families and Society, 78(5), 480–488.Google Scholar
- Spar, K. (1993). Kinship foster care: An emerging federal issue. Report to U. S. Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
- U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. (2000). Administration for children and families, administration on children, youth and families, children’s bureau. Report to the Congress on Kinship Foster Care, http:// aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/kinr2c00/index.htm (accessed August 16, 2005).
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2005). Administration for children and families, administration on children, youth and families, children’s bureau, http://www. acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/publications/afcars/report10.htm. Preliminary Estimates for FY 2003 (accessed August 15, 2005).