Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Peculiarities of Applying the Finite-Difference Method for Solving Nonlinear Problems of the Dynamics of Distributed Systems in a Flow

  • Published:
Cybernetics and Systems Analysis Aims and scope

Abstract

The peculiarities of applying the finite-difference method (FDM) for solving nonlinear dynamic problems of distributed systems (DS) in a flow are considered. The main limitations for using the FDM for numerical modeling of wave propagation and reflection in DS are shown to be the special features of the constitutive quasilinear equations. They necessitate the simultaneous calculation of the variables corresponding to fast and slow wave processes. The term “singularly perturbed system of equations” is used for such systems. These perturbations are the result of a significant difference in the propagation velocities of longitudinal, configurational, bending, and torsional waves in the DS at the physical level. Therefore, it is necessary to use special step-by-step methods of regularization and filtering of the numerical results. It imposes certain contstraints on the ability to model real processes and the accuracy of the results and forces the use of implicit difference schemes and high-frequency filtering. When solving the system of linear algebraic equations, taking into account the poor conditioning of the matrix of convective terms, the method of regularization was chosen by experimental calculation. Calculations according to the Crank–Nicolson difference scheme, even using coarse grids, can give the results with the required degree of accuracy and minimal time cost. Another picture is observed when comparing the results on coarse and fine grids for the Euler difference scheme. Inherent errors brought in by errors in approximating the missing boundary conditions lead to greater differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Troger, A. P. Alperton, V. V. Beletsky, V. I. Dranovskii, V. S. Khoroshilov, A. V. Pirozhenko, and A. E. Zakrzhevskii, Dynamics of Tethered Space Systems, CRC Press (2017).

  2. Amsterdam on Piles. URL: https://www.holandiabeztajemnic.pl/?page_id=32236&lang=ru.

  3. G. Farenyuk, I. Kaliukh, E. Farenyuk, T. Kaliukh, Y. Berchun, and V. Berchun, “Experimental and theoretical diagnostics of defects in ferroconcrete piles based on reflection of longitudinal and transverse waves,” in: D. Hordijk and M. Lukoviñ (eds.), High Tech Concrete: Where Technology and Engineering Meet, Springer, Cham (2018), pp. 1307–1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59471-2_151.

  4. I. Kaliukh, G. Fareniuk, O. Trofymchuk, I. Fareniuk, and Y. Berchun, “Identification of defects in reinforced concrete piles based on multi-wave reflection,” in: Proc. fib Symposium 2019: Concrete — Innovations in Materials, Design and Structures (2019), pp. 991–998.

  5. Y. Kaliukh and A. Vusatiuk, “Factorization in problems of control and dynamics of lengthy systems,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 55, No. 2, 274–283 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-019-00132-9.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Turkish Stream. URL: http://turkstream.info/.

  7. I. Kaliukh and O. Lebid, “Application of asymptotic and numerical methods to determine stability boundaries of distributed systems in a flow,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 58, No. 2, 233–241 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-022-00455-0.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. I. Kaliukh and O. Lebid, “Constructing the adaptive algorithms for solving multi-wave problems,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 57, No. 6, 938–949 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-021-00419-w.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. I. Kaliukh, O. Trofymchuk, and O. Lebid, “Numerical solution of two-point static problems for distributed extended systems by means of the Nelder–Mead method,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 55, No. 4, 616–624 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-019-00170-3.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. AN/ALE-50 towed decoy system. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AN/ALE-50_towed_decoy_system.

  11. Z. H. Zhu, “Dynamic modeling of cable system using a new nodal position finite element method,” Intern. J. Numer. Meth. in Biomed. Eng., Vol. 26, Iss. 6, 692–704 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.1161.

  12. Deep-Sea Mining. URL: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_geolog/1445/D093D0BBD183D0B1D0BED0BAD0BED0B2D0BED0B4D0BDD0B0D18F.

  13. I. Kaliukh, V. Senatorov, O. Khavkin, T. Kaliukh, and K. Khavkin, “Experimental and analytic researches on technical state, design and operation of reinforced concrete anti-landslide structures for seismic dangerous regions of Ukraine,” in: Proc. fib Symposium: Engineering a Concrete Future: Technology, Modeling and Construction (Tel-Aviv, Apr. 22–24, 2013) (2013), pp. 625–628.

  14. A. V. Gladky, I. V. Sergienko, and V. V. Skopetsky, Numerical and Analytical Methods of Studying Wave Processes [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. V. Gladky and V. V. Skopetsky, “Numerical modeling and optimization of one-way wave processes in inhomogeneous media,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 46, No. 5, 845–854 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-010-9266-2.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. V. F. Gubarev, “Rational approximation of distributed parameter systems,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 44, No. 2, 234–246 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-008-0023-8.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. I. T. Selezov, Yu. G. Kryvonos, and I. S. Gandzha, Wave Propagation and Diffraction, Mathematical Methods and Applications, Ser. Foundations of Engineering Mechanics, Springer, Singapore (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4923-1.

  18. A. N. Trofimchuk, “Dynamic interaction of a rigid slab with a water-saturated poroelastic foundation,” Intern. Appl. Mech., Vol. 32, No. 1, 60–64 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02084849.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. N. V. Saltanov, Flexible Threads in Streams [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. P. Tymoshenko, Fluctuations in Engineering [in Russian], Fizmatgiz, Moscow (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  21. O. H. Lebyd, “A five-mode quasilinear model of the nonlinear dynamics of an extended system,” Ekologichna Bezpeka ta Pryrodokorystuvannya, No. 38(2), 104–120 (2021). https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2021.2.104-120.

  22. I. T. Selezov, “Development and application of the Cauchy–Poisson method to layer elastodynamics and the Timoshenko equation,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 54, No. 3, 434–442 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-018-0044-x.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. R. Courant, Partial Differential Equations [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. O. Berteaux, Buoy Engineering (Ocean Engineering, a Wiley Series) [Russian translation], Sudostroenie, Leningrad (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. N. Bukharin, V. N. Kalikov, I. V. Nekrasov, and A. E. Ordanovich, “On the accuracy of the approximation of a flexible thread by a finite-dimensional model,” in: Proc. 3rd Republican Conf. on Applied Hydromechanics, Institute of Hydromechanics of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR, Kyiv (1984), p. 31.

  26. J. M. Leonard and J. H. Nath, “Comparison of finite element and lumped parameter methods for oceanic cables,” J. Eng. Struct., Vol. 3, No. 6, 153–167 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. B. Paul and A. I. Soler, “Cable dynamics and optimum owing strategies for submersibles,” Mar. Technol. Soc. J., Vol. 2, 34–42 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. H. Peyrot and M. Asce, “Marine cable structures,” J. Struct. Div.: Proc. Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng., Vol. 106, No. 12, 2391–2404 (1980).

  29. R. F. Il’in and T. I. Zhigula, “Dynamics of viscoelastic filaments (cables) in multicable lift of a load,” Intern. Appl. Mech., Vol. 12, No. 8, 801–805 (1976).

  30. J.-M. Lin and Ì. Sansalone, “Impact-echo response of hollow cylindrical concrete structure surrounded by soil and rock: Part I — Numerical studies,” Geotechnical Testing, Vol. 17, No. 2, 207–219 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J.-M. Lin and Ì. Sansalone, “Impact-echo response of hollow cylindrical concrete structure surrounded by soil and rock: Part II — Experimental studies,” Geotechnical Testing, Vol. 17, No. 2, 220–226 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. S. T. Liao and J. M. Roesset, “Identification of defects in piles through dynamic testing,” Int. J. for Numer. and Analyt. Meth. in Geomech., Vol. 21, No. 4, 277–291 (1997).

  33. S.-T. Liao, J.-H. Tong, C.-H. Chen, and T.-T. Wu, “Numerical simulation and experimental study of Parallel Seismic test for piles,” Intern. J. of Solids and Structures, Vol. 43, 2279–2298 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. D. Ambrosini and J. Ezeberry, “Long piles integrity trough impact echo technique,” Mecanica Computacional, Vol. XXIV, Buenos Aires, Argentina (2005), pp. 651–669.

  35. D. S. Kim, W. S. Seo, and K. M. Lee, “IE-SASW method for nondestructive evaluation of concrete structure,” NDT&E International, Vol. 39, No. 2, 143–154 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. C. M. Ablow and S. Schechter, “Numerical simulation of undersea cable dynamics,” Ocean Eng., Vol. 10, No. 6, 443–457 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. V. I. Valeev and G. L. Kozhevnikova, Rope Systems in a Flow of Liquid [in Russian], No. 489, TsAGI, Moscow (1976).

  38. A. G. Lebid, “Control and dynamics of a distributed system with variable length,” J. Autom. Inform. Sci., Vol. 52, Iss. 9, 39–50 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1615/JAutomatInfScien.v52.i9.40.

  39. M. A. Kovaleva and A. L. Rutkovsky, Singularly Perturbed Optimal Control Systems [in Russian], Mir Nauki, Moscow (2020). URL: https://www.twirpx.com/file/3444935/.

  40. A. A. Samarskii, Theory of Difference Schemes [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  41. V. K. Khrushch, Numerical Methods of Gas Dynamics [in Russian], Dnipropetrovsk Univ., Dnipropetrovsk (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Y. I. Kaliukh, “Specific features of using the linearization method for the analysis of low-frequency oscillations of a towed system,” Int. Appl. Mech., Vol. 57, No. 1, 103–110 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10778-021-01055-9.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. N. N. Yanenko, Method of Fractional Steps for Solving Multidimensional Problems of Mathematical Physics [in Russian], Nauka, Novosibirsk (1967).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Enterprise “State Research Institute of Building Constructions”, Kyiv, Ukraine

    I. Kaliukh

  2. Institute of Telecomunications and Global Information Space, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

    I. Kaliukh, O. Trofymchuk & O. Lebid

Authors
  1. I. Kaliukh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. Trofymchuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. O. Lebid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Kaliukh.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaliukh, I., Trofymchuk, O. & Lebid, O. Peculiarities of Applying the Finite-Difference Method for Solving Nonlinear Problems of the Dynamics of Distributed Systems in a Flow. Cybern Syst Anal 59, 120–133 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-023-00548-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-023-00548-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation