Skip to main content
Log in

Fast Simulation of the Customer Blocking Probability in Queueing Networks with Multicast Access

  • Published:
Cybernetics and Systems Analysis Aims and scope

Abstract

A model of a queueing network with several input Poisson flows is considered. These flows require connections between given terminals. The connection path depends on the type of the customer, the requested resource, the paths currently occupied, and on the overall load on communication channels of the network. A fast simulation method for evaluation of blocking probability for customers of a certain flow with a required resource not lower than the given one is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K.W. Ross, Multiservice Loss Models for Broadband Telecommunication Networks, Springer-Verlag, London (1995).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. I. B. Frenkel, A. Karagrigoriou, A. Lisnianski, and A. V. Kleyner, Applied Reliability Engineering and Risk Analysis: Probabilistic Models and Statistical Inference, John Wiley & Sons, New York (2013).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Nyberg, J. Virtamo, and S. Aalto, “An exact algorithm for calculating blocking probabilities in multicast networks,” in: G. Pujolle, H. Perros, S. Fdida, U. Korner, and I. Stavrakakis (eds.), Networking 2000: Broadband Communications, High Performance Networking, and Performance of Communication Networks; Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1815, Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg (2000), pp. 275–286.

  4. J. Karvo, “Efficient simulation of blocking probabilities for multi-layer multicast streams,” in: E. Gregori, M. Conti, A. Campbell, C. Omidyar, and M. Zukerman (eds.), Networking 2002: Networking Technologies, Services, and Protocols; Performance of Computer and Communication Networks; Mobile and Wireless Communications; Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2345, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg (2002), pp. 1020–1031.

  5. I. N. Kovalenko and N. Yu. Kuznetsov, Methods to Design Highly Reliable Systems [in Russian], Radio i Svyaz’, Moscow (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. N. Kovalenko, N. Yu. Kuznetsov, and Ph. A. Pegg, Mathematical Theory of Reliability of Time Dependent Systems with Practical Applications, Wiley, Chichester (1997).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Yu. Kuznetsov, “Fast simulation technique in reliability evaluation of Markovian and non-Markovian systems,” in: Simulation and Optimization Methods in Risk and Reliability Theory, Nova Sci. Publ., New York (2009), pp. 69–112.

  8. P. Heidelberger, “Fast simulation of rare events in queueing and reliability models,” ACM Trans. Modeling Comput. Simul., Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 43–85 (1995).

  9. P. Glasserman, Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering, Springer, New York (2004).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. M. S. Ermakov, “Importance sampling for simulation of large and moderate deviation probabilities of tests and estimators,” Theory Probab. Appl., Vol. 51, No. 2, 279–290 (2007).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Li, A. Mosleh, and R. Kang, “Likelihood ratio gradient estimation for dynamic reliability applications,” Reliab. Eng. and System Safety, Vol. 96, No. 12, 1667–1679 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. V. S. Kouikoglou and A. Ph. Yannis, “Review of a fast simulation method for the analysis of queueing networks,” Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, 73–83 (1998).

  13. M. Falkner, M. Devetsikiotis, and I. Lambadaris, “Fast simulation of networks of queues with effective and decoupling bandwidths,” ACM Trans. on Modeling and Comput. Simulation, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, 45–58 (1999).

  14. N. Yu. Kuznetsov and A. A. Shumskaya, “Evaluation of the hazard of failure of the redundant system by fast simulation methods,” J. Autom. Inform. Sci., Vol. 45, No. 5, 38–51 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. B. L. Fox and P. W. Glynn, “Discrete-time conversion for simulating finite-horizon Markov processes,” SIAM J. Appl. Math., Vol. 50, No. 5, 1457–1473 (1990).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. A. A. Shumskaya, “Fast simulation of unavailability of a repairable system with a bounded relative error of estimate,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 39, No. 3, 357–367 (2003).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Glasserman, Ph. Heidelberger, P. Shahabuddin, and T. Zajic, “Multilevel splitting for estimating rare event probabilities,” Oper. Res., Vol. 47, No. 4, 585–600 (1999).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Juneja, P. Shahabuddin, and T. Zajic, “Splitting-based importance-sampling algorithm for fast simulation of Markov reliability models with general repair-policies,” IEEE Trans. on Reliability, Vol. 50, No. 3, 235–245 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Lagnoux, “Rare event simulation,” Probab. Eng. and Inf. Sci., Vol. 20, No. 1, 45–66 (2006).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. I. B. Gertsbakh and Y. Shpungin, Models of Network Reliability: Analysis, Combinatorics, and Monte Carlo, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Blanchet and H. Lam, “Rare event simulation techniques,” in: Proc. 2011 Winter Simulation Conf. (2011), pp. 217–231.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Yu. Kuznetsov.

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetyka ta Systemnyi Analiz, No. 4, July–August, 2021, pp. 30–43.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuznetsov, N.Y., Kuznetsov, I.N. Fast Simulation of the Customer Blocking Probability in Queueing Networks with Multicast Access. Cybern Syst Anal 57, 530–541 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-021-00378-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-021-00378-2

Keywords

Navigation