Skip to main content
Log in

Input–Output Map of Uncertainty of the Economy of Ukraine and its Application

  • Published:
Cybernetics and Systems Analysis Aims and scope

Abstract

The methodology for calculating the inter-industry map of uncertainty of the Ukrainian economy and the results of the calculations are considered. A historical assessment of a fragment of fiscal risks associated with tax revenue from taxes on products and other production taxes is carried out. The sectors of Ukraine’s economy are classified through the prism of the uncertainty map. It is proposed to use the production portfolio of economic activities as a tool to mitigate fiscal risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Horowitz and M. Planting, “Concepts and methods of the U.S. input–output accounts,” Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), U.S. Department of Commerce (2009). https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/methodologies/IOmanual_092906.pdf.

  2. V. M. Glushkov, “DISPLAN: A new planning technology,” Uprav. Sistemy i Mashiny, No. 6, 5–11 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. P. Karpets and V. V. Glushkova, “ On the possibility of using the DISPLAN system for balanced economic management,” in: A. B. Kravchuk (ed.), Cybernetics and Democratic Economic Governance [in Russian], Center for Social and Labor Studies, Kyiv (2017), pp. 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. T. Matveev, Yu. S. Arkhangelskiy, V. P. Rybalchenko et al. Models of the Automated System of Planned Calculations of the State Planning Committee of the Republic [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yu. M. Ermoliev and A. I. Yastremskii, Stochastic Models and Methods in Economic Planning [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. O. I. Yastremskii, Modeling of Economic Risk [in Ukrainian], Lybid’, Kyiv (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Gurgul, “Stochastic input–output modeling,” Ekonomia Menedzerska, No. 2, 57–70 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  8. U. Temursho, “Uncertainty treatment in input–output analysis,” in: Thijs ten Raa (ed.), Handbook of Input–Output Analysis (2017), pp. 407–437. 10.4337/9781783476329.00018.

  9. O. Yastremskii, “Interbranch chessboard of uncertainty and its applications: forecasting, economic policy, fiscal risk, general equilibrium,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 55, No. 3, 369–376 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-019-00143-6.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, IOUse_After_Redefinitions_PRO_1997-2016_Sector.xlsx. [Online] (2017) URL: apps.bea.gov/industry/xls/io-annual/IOUse_After_Redefinitions_PRO_1997-2016_Sector.xlsx (Last accessed June 09, 2020).

  11. G. Markovits, “Portfolio selection,” The J. of Finance, Vol. 7, Iss. 1, 77–91 (1952). 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x.

  12. Ukrainian Input–Output Table at Basic Prices for 2000–2017, Statistical Publication, State Statistics Service of Ukraine, Kyiv (2002–2019). URL: www.ukrstat.gov.ua.

  13. Methodological Provisions for the Organization of State Statistical Observation “Input–Output” Table, State Statistics Service of Ukraine, Kyiv (2018).

  14. National Accounts Statistics: Main Aggregates and Detailed Tables, 2018, Part I–V, United Nations, New York (2019).

  15. European System of Accounts— ESA 2010, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2013).

  16. O. Yastremsky and V. Kulyk, “Volatility of the structure of intersectoral relations of Ukraine’s economy,” Economy and Forecasting, No. 2, 61–79 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. Kopits, “Coping with fiscal risk: Analysis and practice,” OECD J. on Budgeting, Vol. 14, No. 1, 47–71 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-14-5jxrgssdqnlt.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R. T. Rockafellar and S. Uryasev, “Optimization of conditional value-at-risk,” J. of Risk, Vol. 2, No. 3, 21–41 (2000). 10.21314/JOR.2000.038.

  19. P. N. Rasmussen, Studies in Inter-Sectoral Relations, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Gurgul and P. Majdosz, “Key sector analysis: A case of the transited Polish economy,” Managing Global Transitions, Vol. 3, Iss. 1, 95–111 (2005). URL: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISSN/1581-6311/3_095-111.pdf.

  21. Umed Temursho, “Backward and forward linkages and key sectors in the Kazakhstan economy (Final report),” Joint Government of Kazakhstan and Asian development bank knowledge and experience exchange program (2016). URL: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-documents/47110/47110-001-dpta-en_2.pdf.

  22. M. N. Humavindu and J. Stage, “Key sectors of the Namibian economy,” J. of Economic Structures, Vol. 2, Article number 1 (2013). 10.1186/2193-2409-2-1.

  23. O. Yastremskii, “Input–output productivity cost analysis of the economy of Ukraine: Selected cross-countries and intertemporal comparison,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 56, No. 4, 591–602 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-020-00276-z.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Kulyk.

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetyka ta Systemnyi Analiz, No. 3, May–June, 2021, pp. 76–90.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yastremskii, O., Kulyk, V. Input–Output Map of Uncertainty of the Economy of Ukraine and its Application. Cybern Syst Anal 57, 403–416 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-021-00364-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-021-00364-8

Keywords

Navigation