Skip to main content
Log in

The Noosphere Paradigm of the Development of Science and Artificial Intelligence

  • Published:
Cybernetics and Systems Analysis Aims and scope

Abstract

The disciplinary, transdisciplinary, and noosphere paradigms of the development of science and a natural-scientific picture of the World are considered. The role of science, its information-technological component, and the role of artificial intelligence in the evolution of the modern society and noospheregenesis as a whole are described. The basic concepts of the modern paradigm of science are substantiated and formulated. Their essence lies in the efficient combination of problems of knowledge of Nature and society evolution within the framework of the transdisciplinary paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. V. Palagin and A. F. Kurgaev, “Interdisciplinary scientific investigations: Optimization of system-information support,” Visn. NAN Ukrainy, No. 3, 14–25 (2009).

  2. A. F. Kurgaev and A. V. Palagin, “The problem of scientific research effectiveness,” International Journal Information Theories & Applications, Vol. 17, No. 1, 88–99 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. F. Kurgaev and A. V. Palagin, “On the subject of information support for scientific research,” Visn. NAN Ukrainy, No. 8, 33–48 (2015).

  4. A. V. Palagin and A. F. Kurgaev, “A transdisciplinary paradigm for the development of science,” in: Proc. Vth All-Ukrainian Scientific-Practical Conf. “Glushkov readings” on Interdisciplinary Investigations of Actual Problems of Application of Information Technology in the Modern World: Kyiv (2016), A. A. Melnichenko, B. V. Novikov, V. B. Pikhorovich, et al. (compilers), OOO NPP “Interservis,” Kyiv (2016), pp. 141–145.

  5. J. Bollen, H. Van de Sompel, A. Hagberg, L. Bettencourt, R. Chute, et al.,

  6. V. I. Vernadsky, The Biosphere and the Noosphere [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. V. Garkovenko and A. A. Pakhomov, “Homology modeling of the spatial structure of GFP-like proteins,” Modern Problems of Science and Education, No. 6, 76–83 (2012).

  8. N. Shadbolt, T. Berners-Lee, and W. Hall, “The semantic Web revisited,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol. 21, No. 3, 96–101 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. I. Shevchenko, Actual problems of the Theory of Artificial Intelligence [in Russian], IPAI “Science and Education,” Kyiv (2003).

  10. A. Palagin, “Arrangement and functions of a “language” world picture in semantic interpretation of natural languages and messages,” International Journal Information Theories & Application, Vol. 7, No. 4, 155–164 (2000).

  11. A. V. Palagin, “Transdisciplinarity problems and the role of informatics,” Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, Vol. 49, No. 5, 643–651 (2013).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Palagin.

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetika i Sistemnyi Analiz, No. 4, July–August, 2017, pp. 12–21.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palagin, A.V., Kurgaev, A.F. & Shevchenko, A.I. The Noosphere Paradigm of the Development of Science and Artificial Intelligence. Cybern Syst Anal 53, 503–511 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-017-9952-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-017-9952-4

Keywords

Navigation