Skip to main content
Log in

Risk Measures in Stochastic Programming and Robust Optimization Problems

  • SYSTEMS ANALYSIS
  • Published:
Cybernetics and Systems Analysis Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. A. Shapiro, D. Dentcheva, and A. Ruszczynski, Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory, SIAM, Philadelphia (2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Ben-Tal, L. El Ghaoui, and A. Nemirovski, Robust Optimization, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton (2009).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. R. T. Rockafellar, “Coherent approaches to risk in optimization under uncertainty,” in: Tutorials in Operations Research, INFORMS (2007), pp. 38–61.

  4. K. Klamroth, E. Kobis, A. Schobel, and Chr. Tammer, “A unified approach for different concepts of robustness and stochastic programming via non-linear scalarizing functionals,” Optimization, 62(5), 649–671 (2013).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu. M. Ermoliev, Stochastic Programming Methods [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Kouvelis and G. Yu, Robust Discrete Optimization and its Applications, Kluwer, Amsterdam (1997).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Ben-Tal and A. Nemirovski, “Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data,” Mathematical Programming, 88(3), 411–424 (2000).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Fischetty and M. Monaci, “Light robustness,” in: R. K. Ahuja, R. H. Mohring, and C. D. Zaroliagis (eds.), Robust and Online Large-Scale Optimization, Springer, Berlin (2009), pp. 61–84.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Ben-Tal, D. Bertsimas, and D. Brown, “A soft robust model for optimizing under ambiguity,” Operations Research, 58(4), 1220–1234 (2010).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Schobel, “Generalized light robustness and the trade-off between robustness and nominal quality,” Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 80(2), 161–191 (2014).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Artzner, F. Delbaen, J. M. Eber, and D. Heath, “Coherent measures of risk,” Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203–228 (1999).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. V. S. Kirilyuk, “Coherent risk measures and portfolio optimization problems,” Teoriya Optym. Rishen’, V. M. Glushkov Inst. of Cybernetics, NAS of Ukraine, Issue 2 (2003), pp. 111–119.

  13. V. S. Kirilyuk, “The class of polyhedral coherent risk measures,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, 40, No. 4, 599–690 (2004).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. V. S. Kirilyuk, “Polyhedral coherent risk measures and optimal portfolios on the reward–risk ratio,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, 50, No. 5, 724–740 (2014).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. R. T. Rockafellar and S. Uryasev, Optimization of conditional value-at-risk," J. of Risk, 2(3), 21–41 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Acerbi, “Spectral measuers of risk: A coherent representation of subjective risk aversion,” J. of Banking and Finance, 26(7), 1505–1518 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Kusuoka, “On law invariant coherent risk measures,” in: S. Kusuoka and T. Maruyama (eds.), Advances in Mathematical Economics, 3, Springer, Tokyo (2001), pp. 83–95.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. V. S. Kirilyuk, “Polyhedral coherent risk measures and investment portfolio optimization,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, 44, No. 2, 250–260 (2008).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. A. I. Kibzun, A. V. Naumov, and V. I. Norkin, “On reducing a quantile optimization problem with discrete distribution to a mixed integer programming problem,” Autom. and Remote Control, 74, No. 6, 951–967 (2013).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. V. I. Norkin, A. I. Kibzun, and A. V. Naumov, “Reducing two-stage probabilistic optimization problems with discrete distribution of random data to mixed-integer programming problems,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, 50, No. 5, 679–692 (2014).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. R. T. Rockafellar, S. Uryasev, and M. Zabarankin, “Generalized deviations in risk analysis,” Finance and Stochastics, 10(1), 51–74 (2006).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. V. S. Kirilyuk, “Expected utility theory, optimal portfolios, and polyhedral coherent risk measures,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, 50, No. 6, 874–883 (2014).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Ahmed, “Convexity and decomposition of mean-risk stochastic programs,” Mathematical Programming, 106(3), 433–446 (2006).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. S. Kirilyuk.

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetika i Sistemnyi Analiz, No. 6, November–December, 2015, pp. 46–59.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirilyuk, V.S. Risk Measures in Stochastic Programming and Robust Optimization Problems. Cybern Syst Anal 51, 874–885 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-015-9780-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-015-9780-3

Keywords

Navigation