Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of the Methods for Classification of Observations in Predicting Complications in Critically ILL Patients

  • SOFTWARE–HARDWARE SYSTEMS
  • Published:
Cybernetics and Systems Analysis Aims and scope

Abstract

We compare cluster analysis, Wald’s sequential analysis, and the method of coordinate system rotation for the classification of patients with acute destructive pancreatitis and patients with acute combined radiation damage for early detection of complications. In the first case, the Wald analysis is efficient. In the second case, k-means cluster analysis and coordinate rotation method are proposed

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. M. Savula, V. K. Pauchok, and N. S. Kravchenko, “Applying modified cluster analysis of standard medical examination data to diagnose some lungs diseases,” Ukr. Pulmonologich. Zhurn., No. 4, 39–41 (2010).

  2. D. E. Schaubel, “Analysis of clustered recurrent event data with application to hospitalization rates among renal failure patients,” Biostatistics, 6, No. 3, 404–419 (2005).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Weatherall, P. Shirtcliffe, J. Travers, and R. Beasley, “Use of cluster analysis to define COPD phenotypes,” Eur. Respir. J., 36, 472–474 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. I. Borodulin, A. V. Sviridov, and O. V. Sudakov, “Using cluster analysis in diagnostics of ischemic heart disease,” Prikl. Informats. Aspekty Meditsiny, 11, No. 2, 28–32 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. V. Maksim’yuk, “Special features of the clinical pattern of acute destructive pancreatitis in patients with polymorphism of R1221 gene of catione trypsinogen (PRSS1),” Bukovyn. Medychn. Visnyk, 16, No. 1(61), 45–48 (2012).

  6. I. G. Akoev, G. I. Maksimov, and V. M. Malyshev, Radiation Damage in Mammals and Statistical Modeling [in Russian], Atomizdat, Moscow (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. B. Keirim-Markus, N. G. Darinskaya, V. L. Gozenbuk, et al., “Mathematical model to predict lethal result in hematopoietic form of radiation damage,” in: Mechanism of the System of Interaction in Radiation Damage. Theoretical Premises and Models [in Russian], NTsBI AN SSSR, Pushchino (1978), pp. 90–98.

  8. I. B. Keirim-Markus, O. A. Kochetkov, E. N. Chernov, et al., “Estimate of the non-uniformity of radiation dose in case of a human exposed to nuclear blast,” in: Biological Effects of Non-Uniform Radiation [in Russian], Atomizdat, Moscow (1974), pp. 5–9.

  9. A. P. Bliznyuk, V. P. Gozenbuk, and I. B. Keirim-Markus, “Radiation-monitoring criterion for the intestinal form of acute radiation damage of a human. Empirical model,” Radiobiologiya, 28, Issue 6, 809–811 (1988).

  10. D. G. Altman and J. M. Bland, “Diagnostic tests 1: Sensitivity and specificity,” BMJ, 308, June, 1552 (1994).

  11. A. K. Guskova, A. E. Baranov, G. D. Selidovkin, et al., “Diagnostics, clinical pattern, and treatment of acute radiation syndrome in persons injured in the Chernobyl disaster. Report 2. Non-marrowy syndromes of radiation damages and their treatment,” Therapeutic Archive, 12, 99–103 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. R. Boichuk and M. A. Gratsianska, “A mathematical approach to predicting the occurrence of intestine syndrome and estimating the injury level of adjoint radiation damage,” Bukovyn. Medychn. Visnyk, 6, No. 3, 23–28 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. F. Lakin, Biometrics: A Manual for Biologists in Special High Schools [in Russian], Vyssh. Shkola, Moscow (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Kullbak, Information Theory and Statistics, Dover Books on Mathematics, Dover Publ. (1997).

  15. E. V. Gubler and A. A. Genkin, Application of Nonparametric Statistical Criteria in Medical and Biological Investigations [in Russian], Meditsina, Leningrad (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. V. Gubler, Computing Methods of the Analysis and Recognition of Pathological Processes [in Russian], Meditsina, Leningrad (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  17. I. D. Mandel, Cluster Analysis [in Russian], Financy i Statistika, Moscow (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. Höppner, F. Klawonn, R. Kruse, and T. Runkler, Fuzzy Cluster Analysis. Methods for Classification, Data Analysis and Image Recognition, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1999).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bukovinian State Medical University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine

    M. A. Ivanchuk

  2. Yu. Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine

    I. V. Malyk

Authors
  1. M. A. Ivanchuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. V. Malyk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. A. Ivanchuk or I. V. Malyk.

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetika i Sistemnyi Analiz, No. 2, March–April, 2015, pp. 164–174.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ivanchuk, M.A., Malyk, I.V. Comparison of the Methods for Classification of Observations in Predicting Complications in Critically ILL Patients. Cybern Syst Anal 51, 303–312 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-015-9722-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-015-9722-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation